The next epic Dilbert comic! I expect to see this one on T-Shirts at conventions soon.
The next epic Dilbert comic! I expect to see this one on T-Shirts at conventions soon.
Ok, granted, the “climate change is caused by us and we’re all gonna die” folks need credibility help, because they really are terrible missionaries for their cause. They look, talk, act, and breath like they’re hiding a grand conspiracy. I think that most of that is just institutional arrogance, but who can tell the difference? Of course ignoring planetary science, and climate change on other planets, just because they “muddy the message” is just stupid, but there is plenty of stupid on the issue to go around.
People have to stop treating scientists like they’re incorruptible. They like money and renown just as much as anyone else with house payments, and they speak a lot of lemming-speak back and forth betwixt themselves, especially when an issue becomes popular enough to make funding easy. Opportunism and a whole ‘nother flavor of the denialism surrounds them on a variety of issues.
On the other hand, will Conservatives who continue to deny that the climate changes ever get a clue? Maybe. At some point, someone may ask, “Why are they being so stupid?…” Of course the obvious answer is, “…because big oil pays them to be stupid”. Now there are so many good, honest and important issues that Conservatives stand for, and those issues are all in danger because of this idiotic, almost lunatic view that the climate does not change. Satellite to that is the unsubstantiated claim that if the climate does change temperature then humans have no influence on it. Ok, listen! You can’t say that your opponents cannot support their claims due to a lack of data to support their models…and then hold an equally reticent position based on even less data…especially when your PR is worse than your opponent’s.
Pope Francis was said to be preparing a statement called an “Encyclical Letter“, which is essentially an official position paper from the Catholic Church, making climate change reversal a moral prerogative. I think it’s a stretch to call it that, it was released on Thursday and I don’t think it said that. It says “…a very solid scientific consensus indicates” that climate change is happening and has a variety of assigned causes, including human activity. I can’t argue with that. It also touts that environmental responsibility is important…I agree with that also.
My fellow Conservatives should not criticize the Pope for taking sides against them. It is not his job to agree with them. The document is carefully worded to not claim expertise on the issue. In fact, it seems to carefully avoid sourcing itself for its conclusions about climate change. Many non-experts…like myself, the news media, and politicians…take no care to do that. For a Conservative politician to say that the Pope is no expert on climate change, or for the news media to say that a Conservative Politician is no expert on climate change, or for me to say that any of the above is no expert on climate change…takes comedic irony to a whole new level.
Environmental and cultural responsibility do seem to be major themes of the Encyclical. However, out of the 246 numbered paragraphs in the document, only 8 or so specifically mention climate change. News sources everywhere seem to like quoting out of those sections only. Interesting. It’s as if the world’s most influential religious leader had nothing else important to say.
The document also speaks out against the usual topics of war and moral decline, but folks don’t seem to be interested in talking about that. I saw 3 or 4 paragraphs in the Encyclical Letter which spoke of the disintegration of the family unit. I Googled it…nope, no mention. My Google search did spider several links to articles saying that the Pope is going to theme the next meeting of the Synod on the topic of families, and supposedly talk about it on an upcoming U.S. tour. The family unit has been confirmed, by both science and religious leaders from the whole of Christiandom (that can’t seem to agree on much else), to be very important to our culture at several levels…and at least one science writer remembered to mention that today.
So maybe there is hope. ;-)
This is not good.
Even though the crash of the Proton third stage with the Mexsat 1 satellite probably has no connection whatsoever to the loss of the Progress cargo delivery to the ISS, it still looks like two failed Russian launches in something like three weeks. They don’t need that.
In case you haven’t already heard, a Russian Proton launch vehicle had some kind of stage separation failure on Saturday (May 16th) and turned a Mexican communications satellite into a pretty light show over Siberia…instead of delivering it into orbit. Sorry, Mexico.
The fact is, this particular launch vehicle has had a lot of problems. Folks should not automatically lump it in with Progress or Soyuz. They will, but it is a different organization, different issues (presumably), different companies, and different quality control systems. Still, ROSCosmos has delayed the next Soyuz 2 months because of the Progress failure a couple of weeks ago as they investigate that incident. It’s a good thing that the Progress space craft currently docked at the the International Space Station was able to start its engines and raise the station’s orbit today (5/19/15). It couldn’t on Saturday.
But here’s the thing, unlike Progress and Soyuz, Proton competes in a very active industry against several other companies who are achieving far better launch success trends than Proton.
International Launch Services, the joint Russian-U.S. company who oversaw this launch, is already struggling against ULA, Arianspace, and others. Now the lower-priced SpaceX, who with its recent engine upgrades is now launching a larger class of telcom satellites, and in a few months will have the first flight of their new heavy launcher, is deep into that market too. Reliability (measured in terms of success history), and experience are the biggest things the old players have going for them today. Launch failures are bad for business, in a business that for ROSCosmos is already not nominal.
Russia is developing more modern heavy-lift rockets, but their current line of launchers has to keep flying until the new launchers are ready. They have to keep up their launch frequency in order to maintain the cost-effectiveness of their rocket building and launching infrastructure overall.
That snarky comment from a Russian politico about NASA astronauts needing a trampoline to get to the International Space station was probably bad for ILS’ business also. But might there come a day when a U.S. Congressperson gets to say that back to the Russians? We shall see.
Progress, the Russian ISS cargo ship, is dead and spinning out of control. It will reenter the atmosphere and burn up in an unknown location some day very soon.
If you Tweet your guess to #SplashdownBingo you could win a 3-D printed Progress if you guess right.
Here are the rules…
Either way, that was way cool! I need to write something like that into a story-line sometime and describe it through the eyes of the one on the ride.
Today, the Dragon Crew Capsule underwent its pad abort test. As of this writing it appeared successful, but I guess they’ll know that for sure after they study the data returned from it. The test is to confirm that the spacecraft can escape a launch accident at the pad from a dead stop. If this had been an actual launch accident, with people inside, it would have had to put a lot of distance between itself and a rocket exploding on the launch pad and outrun debris from the blast. To do that, it pretty much has to be shot out of cannon.
Do you think that was fast enough?
Other systems have been tested this way, but this flight was to test a new technology that will lower costs, improve flexibility and survive-ability and also prepare the way to start landing these capsules and re-flying them. That will lower the cost of spaceflight and bring it closer to you and I. Unlike past launch abort systems, which use a solid rocket booster tower attached to the nose of the capsule, this system uses eight liquid-fueled rockets attached to the capsule. The plan is, that on some future flight, they will use these rockets to land the capsule after successful flights. The launch abort tower system that other systems use just gets tossed aside after launch to burn up in the atmosphere and the capsule splashes down in the ocean.
This capsule will be recovered after the test and studied for issues that they will correct for the final design. Then this same capsule is intended to be relaunched on the in-flight abort test later this year.
A Russian Progress cargo ship, one of the world’s most reliable spacecraft systems, failed about a week ago. Sometime between solar panel deployment and navigation antenna deployment, something went “snap” and left it tumbling in an unstable orbit where it had been delivered by its launcher. Progress was supposed to use its own thrusters to enter orbit with the International Space Station and dock with it to deliver supplies, new experiments, and other things. Unable to complete that final step, it was only a matter of time. Last night (May 7th, 2015 U.S. time) it reentered the atmosphere and disintegrated over the Pacific Ocean. On a personal note, I picked that it would die over Texas in @VaxHeadroom’s #SplashdownBingo contest on Twitter. Oh well, maybe next time. :-)
People don’t ride on Progress, and no person was ever at risk from this accident…except for the very remote possibility of a piece of it falling on someone’s head). The Space Station’s cargo delivery routine has enough variability and overkill built into it to allow for mishaps such as this…rocket science is hard and everyone knows that. This delivery by the Progress spacecraft was important, and station operations will be impacted by its loss, but not critically.
A U.S. commercial cargo delivery spacecraft, Cygnus, was destroyed late last year when the Antares rocked carrying it failed five or so seconds after launch and exploded. These two losses put a temporary halt in the operation of both of those systems while the problems are found and corrected. This has placing added reliance on other launch and delivery providers. Progress has some systems in common with the spacecraft that astronauts and cosmonauts ride on, so it could cause delays to that schedule as well.
All of this only further highlights the need to have multiple launch providers supporting the International Space Station. The U.S. Congress has wanted to down-select to a single commercial provider for sending NASA astronauts to the ISS. They hope that this will result in a reliance on the NASA-owned Orion spacecraft (currently having trouble filling it’s launch manifest) for ISS visits.
Those who are doing this only seek to protect traditional launch industry providers and their components which are located in their home states which too overpriced and stagnant to compete in an open-market system. NASA has said repeatedly that they want multiple commercial providers to fill the ISS support transport role because they are getting out of the Space Station supply activities business, so that the very expensive Orion can focus on exploring the rest of the solar system. The fact that NASA currently pays Russia to launch our (and Japan’s and Canada’s) astronauts to the station on Soyuz, rivets home the fact that the traditional, big government ownership of single-provider routine spaceflight that we’ve used for fifty years cannot be relied upon for an expansive, routine space program.
Progress will fly again…probably late this year. Cygnus will fly again sooner, but on another provider’s rocket. The SpaceX Dragon will visit the station in June, maybe with a few Russian experiments on board. During all of this, the U.S. Government will fight over how these flights will go in the future from the U.S. end. U.S. citizen participation in this process will be critical in helping keep that Government from practicing stupid, self-serving politics regarding space policy and help assure a healthy, reliable system in the years to come.
Folks in the U.S House of Representatives discussed the following important question last week…
Should NASA’s budget include money for climate change research come out of NASA’s?
BTW, they decided no…sort of. It isn’t entirely up to them anyway, and the President won’t stand for a $500,000 cut in climate research from anyone’s budget.
It ties in with this question…
Should a publicly perceived good thing be treated as the only thing?
…and this one…
Is Climate Change more of a science or more of a funding band wagon?
I’m all for Climate Change research. I think that study and discussion of Climate Change is critical to the survival of our culture, maybe even our ciivlization. I don’t fully agree with mainstream Conservatives or Liberals on the topic. The climate is warming and it has had and will have an impact on our environment and world cultures and economies…and we need to know how much of an impact it will have on us and how much of an impact we have on it.
These questions involve numerous variables, only one of which is the footprint that we leave on the environment. However…folks are overly polarized concerning how much or how little we are driving Climate Change and refuse to listen to each other. Many of these same folks divide along the same lines on several political and cultural issues that they want to disenpower each other on. There is also a lot of personal investment in relevant industries on both sides of the question, by those on the further ends of both sides of the Climate Change debate.
So, should NASA do climate science? Let’s start by defining some acronyms and assigning roles…
What do these all have in common? Well, they all have their own portion of Federal funding. They all employ scientists…of various disciplines and specialties. They can all own, design, fund, launch, and operate Earth-watching satellites by themselves…or rather can hire someone to do so on their behalf.
So the real questions I think should be….
Does NASA need to conduct Earth Climate Science? –>For their purposes, yes, because Earth is a planet and NASA studies planets. For Climate Science advancement purposes…no, because everything that research needs from NASA is already old-hat common and easily had (perhaps less expensively) from the growing space industry and scientific community at large. Do you see where I’m going with this?
Is NASA best suited to guide Earth Climate science? Umm…no. That’s NOAA’s job. They can hire NASA to help them, if they choose, with their funding, but I think they probably don’t need to and would save some money if they made use of the private sector instead of government employees.
However, if you see Climate Science as a just huge trough from which scientists feed, then you might ask, “Why can’t NASA join in the feast?” Well, first of all, no one directly involved with Climate Change research is going to publicly admit to that angle of the issue. Putting that aside though, Congress has not said that NASA should loose that half million dollars, but rather that they would spend it on the Space Launch System instead of Climate Change research. I’m glad that Congress has stopped taking money away from Commercial Crew and Planetary Science to feed SLS/Orion, but I would have preferred it if they’d shifted any cost savings from cuts to Climate Science to repair some of the recent years’ cuts to Planetary Science.
Also, NASA and politicians need Public Relations help. Very few people understand the importance of most of the things that NASA does, because very few people understand most of the things that NASA does. Climate Science is a large issue that gives those who are not familiar with NASA something to sink their teeth into. It’s like when NASA provided topographic imagery to aid in rescue efforts after the earthquake in Nepal. It makes NASA look good in the eyes of folks who don’t understand anything else that NASA does, and NASA needs that. Those who support the larger scientific stand with respect to Eart’s climate trumpet Government taking the issue seriously enough to spend money on it. Those who oppose the broader scientific community see NASA’s involvement as an opportunity to set the record straight, both because NASA seems to be a standard-setting agency and because they don’t seem to mind stepping on a few toes. For NASA involvement in Climate Change is a PR win no matter what happens. The truth is that NASA contributes to both Climate Change and disaster assistance without ever having to spend their own money on them. NOAA works with NASA on the space-based components of Climate Science research without government having to make a show of throwing money at them for it. Sensors already mounted on the ISS aren’t going to just go away either.
Earth Climate Science needs Planetary Science and Planetary Science needs Climate Science, but all of that is part of the information that flows between researchers anyway. NOAA does not need NASA to build and launch satellites for them to use NASA knowledge. Anyone they would likely hire to build spacecraft would already be NASA partners and thus have access to the NASA knowledge base anyway.
The fact remains that the best PR money can buy for NASA, bar none, is expanding the envelope of human spaceflight. This is done by Planetary science, SLS/Orion, and Commercial Crew. Bolden and Obama have already said that they want NASA to study the rest of the solar system. So let’s let NASA stop goofing around in low Earth orbit, pointing cameras at the Earth, and let them zoom in on what’s out there that we don’t see yet. Yet NOAA buy, launch and operate their own satellites.
First, I need to gloat.
I saw it before you did! Aaaa nah nah-nah, nah-nah nah!
There, now that that’s over with, I think I’ll tell you about it.
Don’t worry, no spoilers here, and there are enough twists to make most anything I say a spoiler…oops, that was a spoiler. I little one.
My son Dallin and I went to see it tonight, and the powers that dictate showing schedules allowed the local theater here in Evanston to show it at 7:00 pm instead of waiting until midnight. So my boy and I were driving home while some of you were still waiting to get in.
As I write this, about half of you opening-night owls are seeing it or just sitting down, so you won’t see my comments, but the rest of you listen up.
All I need to tell you is that there is more personal violence, some cussin’ and a couple more direct sexual innuendos than the vague “one out of five” quip that Stark tosses at Loki in the first Avengers (I mean, even some ADULTS might not get that one!) So you might consider leaving your kids home until you’ve had a chance to judge it for yourself. Also, the robot Ultron has a god complex and likes to quote Bible scripture a little bit, for those of you who are bothered by that sort of thing…I’m not but I’ve heard that some of you are. I have a couple of other complaints, but if I share them it’ll draw your attention to them and you might not enjoy the movie as much, and it does deserve a chance to entertain you.
Still, lots of action, more than the last one in fact, and super hero vs super hero fights. Yes, Iron Man and the Hulk get to mix it up just like it shows in the trailer, I won’t tell you who wins. There is also a little bit of the best kind of romance…I’ll let you work on that one a little before you see it.
All in all we enjoyed it. I’ll let you decide how it compares with the first one.
A quarter century ago, the Space Shuttle Discovery launched with the Hubble Space Telescope aboard. Originally slated as a 400 million dollar project, its combination of contractor problems, schedule slippage, the loss of the Space Shuttle Challenger, and the cost overruns that resulted from all of that inflated the price tag to 2.5 billion dollars. Many breathed a sigh of relief at that shuttle launch.
After that it was found that the contractor that built the 2.4 meter mirror had misshaped it, but did so so precisely that corrective optics were able to reverse the problem, first for the entire telescope and then later for each instrument. Hubble was planned from the start to be repaired in orbit, but that means that it flies in low orbit where the Space Shuttle could reach it. Then the Shuttle had to boost the orbit because Hubble flies low enough that the upper atmosphere puts drag on it. The amount of that drag has so many built-in variables that some types of long-term observations have had to be watched carefully to make sure that Hubble keeps its aim true. Low orbit also means that the Earth, Moon, and Sun often swing around into the viewer, requiring operators to interrupt a study and point away to protect delicate instruments from the glare.
In spite of it all, Hubble has been called the most successful scientific instrument of all time.
Most folks who visit http://hubblesite.com go there to see the many pretty pictures, but those are just the icing on the cake. Like all of NASA’s and ESA’s other robotic spacecraft, most of what Hubble does involves science that most of us do not understand. Hubble has performed an unprecedented series of break-through science that only a general purpose orbiting telescope of its size can achieve. Also, five repair and upgrade missions have swapped in more advanced instruments and other tech to help today’s Hubble achieve astonishing images and science that the older technology of the corrected Hubble version 1 had not never been equipped to do.
In celebration of the 25th anniversary of Hubble, they’ve offered up a host of cool stuff for us to savor. It’s a mixed bag of goodies that would take me too long to go through and tell you about, so I’ll just pass on the links…
You might also be interested in ESAs production called HubbleCast…
They expect Hubble to last another six years or more, to give the James Webb Space Telescope time to fly and work in tandem with it. The JWST is an infrared telescope that can acheive science that Hubble can’t do, because Hubble’s instruments are too warm to do infra-red observations very well. The JWST will not fly in low Earth orbit, but will orbit a gravitational pocket called a Lagrange Point on the far side of Earth from the Sun. There, it will be able to keep its sun-shield pointed at the Sun, and the Earth and Moon will not shadow it, so as to maintain JWST’s instruments at a constant, very low temperature. It will also be able to observe targets for much longer periods and view them in far greater resolution with its 6.5 meter wide system of mirrors.
The Space Shuttle that made Hubble possible has retired, but the telescope lives on and continues to teach us new things about our area of space, as well as distant times and galaxies. May we all remember the little telescope that could and the science that it provides. However, the Shuttle is not going back up to upgrade and boost the telescope again, it is on its final journey. The most recent upgrade included a package of equipment to safely de-orbit it. What will replace Hubble if the JWST dies of budget cuts before Arian can launch it?
Google recently placed an emphasis on easing the use of mobile devices on their site. They’ve done this with a “Mobile-Friendly” tag and by emphasizing Mobile Friendly pages in their search algorithm.
WordPress has released a news article concerning these developments that contain other relevant links on the issue…
Actually, this blog has always has been Mobile-Freindly, since it’s author has used PDAs since the release of the Compaq IPAQ. ;-) Back then, I used Handango to preload mobile-friendly websites of interest whenever I docked my Windows-Mobile IPAQ, which didn’t have its own networking ability.
Still I checked today just to make sure that I hadn’t missed anything important. You should do this with your site too. Click Here and type in your site’s URL to let Google assess the Mobile Friendliness of your site.
When I first chose the now retired WordPress ChaoticSoul theme for this blog many years ago, I chose it for the color scheme and how well that the theme fit a website focused on Space Exploration. However, I also checked to see how it looked on a mobile device and I liked the results. On a mobile, the sidebar content gets downstream after the content though, so I still need to find a better way to make sure that popular old hit generators like Shocking Truth Revealed and Another Breathtaking Image from Hubble still show up on search engines while not pushing the important stuff in my sidebar (the bread and butter of the site) impossibly far down the page for folks who just hit the main page URL from a mobile.
At the same time, I’d like to reduce load times for the entry screen. New viewers hitting the un-embellished URL shouldn’t have to load image and text clear back to the inception of the site just so that Google can fully spider all of the content to direct folks Googling for what to feed their newly-hatched mantids to my page showing them how the adult Preying Mantis eats a hummingbird. ;-)
Any suggestions from other WordPress users?
Eight varieties of chicken pullet.
Four varieties of turkey.
Two varieties of gosling.
Just like people.
Some types flee from me.
Some types ignore me.
Some types look at me as if to say, “Would he be my freind?”
Just like people.
“We have room in the back yard,” say my wife and son.
“We’d need to buy more than just the chicks,” I say. “They’d need food and shelter”.
I talked them out of it.
Then I came to the feed store,
I looked at the eight varieties of chicken pullet,
Like little fuzz balls.
Four varieties of turkey,
With their ragged wings.
Two varieties of gosling,
Then I think about eggs and drumsticks,
And start reading books about raising chickens.
After six successful missions to the International Space Station, including five official resupply missions for NASA, SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft are set to liftoff from Launch Complex 40 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, for their sixth official Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) mission to the orbiting lab. Liftoff is targeted for Monday April 13, 2015, at 4:33pm EDT.
If all goes as planned, Dragon will arrive at the station approximately two days after liftoff. Dragon is expected to return to Earth approximately five weeks later for a parachute-assisted splashdown off the coast of southern California. Dragon is the only operational spacecraft capable of returning a significant amount of supplies back to Earth, including experiments.
The live launch webcast will begin here at approximately 4:15pm EDT. http://livestre.am/55t5J
“It’s a barge.”
“I know it’s a barge, but it’s…you know…different.”
“I know it is.”
“Why’s it different?”
“Would you get back to work please?”
“I will, I will, just tell me what it’s for.”
“They’re gonna land a rocket on it.”
“They’re gonna land a rocket on the middle of that barge.”
“What…on that ‘X’ there?”
“Are you sure?”
“Yep, they talked about it on the news.”
“Yep. Would you watch what you’re doin’ please? You almost broke that.”
“Oh…sorry. That’s not what they’re for.”
“That’s not what barges are for…nor rockets for that matter.”
“Confound it! Why are they landing a rocket on a barge?”
“To save money.”
“To save money? How?”
“(Sigh) OK, they launch something into space with the rocket, then they fly the rocket back down and land it on the barge. Then the barge brings the rocket back and it hops on over back to a landing pad, then they move it to a launch pad, then they refuel the rocket and launch something else into space with it.”
“Wow. How much does the rocket cost?”
“‘Bout sixty million.”
“No Pesos! Of course Dollars!”
“That’s a lot of money.”
“Not really, but the fuel is only ’bout two-hundred grand.”
“OK, so let me get this straight. They build a rocket for sixty million, launch it, and then bring it back and launch it again for just a couple hundred K?”
“Well, sort of. It’s quite a bit more complicated than that…but…ya. That’s the general idea. Eventually they’ll skip the barge and just land it on land. They need to practice out at sea first.”
“I see. Isn’t stuff like that supposed to cost, like, billions of dollars?”
“Hmm, times they are a changin’.”
“Hey! Maybe, if it gets cheap enough, maybe you and I can go to space.”
“Not if we don’t get this work done. Hey, don’t sit on that!”
“Oh…sorry. You know lots of stuff, Elon.”
We at the WordPress writing101 workshop have been assigned today to write about someone we’ve met this past year. The truth, I have to say, is that I haven’t had time to get out and meet people in that much detail lately. Between a new job at work and a turn in Dallin’s health, my life has been full for two or three years now.
Those of you who already know me may have wondered where I’ve been and what I’ve been doing. My son’s care needs have increased to the point that it is difficult to keep up. Also, his health is too unstable for me to make commitments with the level of reliability that I expect of myself. That is why I stopped actively attending Science Fiction conventions in 2014, and won’t likely attend any in 2015 either.
Dallin is 21 years old and has Duchenne’s Muscular Dystrophy. (http://ask.healthline.com/health/duchenne-muscular-dystrophy)
I’ve not talked about him here because this blog’s purpose is to promote my published works, and telling the world that I have a son with special needs is not viewed by me as an appropriate way to sell books. You understand. However, the writing101 prompt wants a character vignette of a person who has had a major influence on my life. I spend much time with Dallin, much more even than I spend with my spouse, so I think he influences my life more than anyone right now. My job is to give him as full and normal a life as possible, while still keeping him alive as long as possible. Right now that means staying out a little late several times a week with him and his peers.
His grandmother first noticed his swollen calf muscles when he was very young and started to add it all up. Muscular Dystrophy runs in my wife’s family and so her mother has had experience with it and knew the signs. My wife noticed that he fell down more than he should as he learned to walk. He doesn’t walk anymore, but he gets around anyway.
But I’ve gotten ahead myself.
Before Dallin started attending Kindergarten my wife commented, “I feel almost selfish, having him all to myself”. Everywhere he goes, he makes friends of every age group. His contagious smile and dry, gently mischievous sense of humor draws people to him in droves. When I’d bring him with me when I went to vote, he’d end up in the middle of a cluster of people I’d never met. He often attended MDA (Muscular Dystrophy Association) summer camp in Salt Lake City as he grew up and my wife was a little bit surprised several years into it to find a mural of Dallin on the wall behind a camp organizer’s desk.
Like a lot of folks, he spends a lot of time in his own thoughts and doesn’t always seem to grasp the power of his magnetism. One day when he was in highschool I saw a young lady from our church congregation, sitting in her father’s pickup truck in the grocery store parking lot, straining her neck to get Dallin to meet eyes with her. I said, “Dallin, will you please wave to that poor girl before she has to go see a chiropractor?” He had honestly not even known that anyone else was around. He doesn’t seek attention, it just arrives and jumps in front of his wheelchair.
In spite of all this he really doesn’t date much. I think it is because of a lack of initiative. This is because his physical needs have required him to be under constant adult supervision his entire life. We’re working on that and I coach and encourage him.
He has always demonstrated much in the way of artistic skills. From tin foil origami to computer art. He has acquired a computer gaming habit along the way, which we have worked with him to correct. Now he spends his days reading, drawing, making things, and playing chess both against the computer and online. Every Thursday he serves as a missionary for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints doing Family History work.
A couple of years ago he started catching pneumonia from time to time.
Each time we’ve agreed to have his physicians add something to his care to cheat the Reaper. Each of these interventions add to his care needs. I and his mother are his primary care providers, but my wife has a bad back, and we have a younger son with Asperger’s Autism that also needs our attention. So we have hired helpers assist us with Dallin, and we have Government assisted funding to pay for them, so we can manage as long as he can. His other caregivers feel the same about him as the rest of us do.
By all rights he should be dead, but medical technology has found ways to extend the lives of people with his condition. It is called a childhood illness because its victims don’t usually get better and don’t live much into adulthood. The type of DMD that Dallin has only gets worse until diminished heart and lung function eventually causes the victim to lose a fight with pneumonia. I’ve always had a good immune system, not so much now that I’m growing older, but Dallin’s ability to heal injury and fight off disease is better than mine ever was. That has helped keep him in our lives I’m sure. We wish we could have him longer than he will be with us. Without the pneumonia and flu vaccinations he gets every year, we might have lost him already. Most recently we’ve started to feed him through a stomach tube so that he can get the nutrition he needs without the risk of aspirating food and drink into his lungs.
He is a joy to have around. When he does finally leave this world he will leave a very large gap in the hearts of all who know him. I know that I will not take it well, so I’ve decided I’ll need to write a book about his life with us to help me cope when the time comes. I guess this blog article is kind of a content study. What kinds of things would you like to know about our lives with Dallin? Leave comments.
Who’s letter? “Dear Santa,…”? Me!
The need for stress relief can make us do some weird and stupid things, and Microsoft Certification tests are SO HARD!
Almost twenty years ago, while working toward a MCT certification, I went and did a really dumb thing that could have gotten me killed. I tried to hike the trail between City Creek Canyon and Mill Creek Canyon down into Mueller Park…alone.
I arrived at the trail head dressed in fur trade period clothing, for the “dream” as reenacters call it. I had a map and compass and everything…I’m not that stupid. It was a very poor-quality map in a book, but I’d also looked at the route on a satellite photo on the computer and studied out the trail. Someone told me that it was a very difficult, all-day hike and I believed them. I’ve done similar things successfully before, so I wasn’t worried. I planned to get to the top of the ridge between the canyons by 2 pm and and then follow the trail back along the ridge line and then down into the park and meet up with my wife and family around sunset. I’d hiked from the park up to the ridge line several times before, but I hadn’t been up City Creek Canyon. The day was Saturday, July 22nd 1995.
I parked my car and started my walk. I’d hiked quite high from Mueller Park before, and cross-country skied the lower areas of the park in winter. I knew about where I’d get down into familiar territory and where the trail that I knew of in the park eventually joined the ridge line. I knew about how long it would take to get back down from there. I carried so much confidence in the adventure that all I brought to eat was a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for lunch when I reached the foot of Grandview Peak.
The trail started out smooth and easy and I walked with a wide gate. On that high-country trail, with wildflowers up to my elbows, I felt rejuvenated. The tension melted off. It’s as if the mountain and the floura lent me their strength and urged me onward. I came across an older couple heading down and we chatted a bit. I told them what I planned to do, and they seemed to appreciate my courage, while doubtful glances between them seemed to say that they thought I might have bitten off more than I could chew.
Some time later, around 11:30, I came to what I knew would be the hard part of my journey, a wide and steep wash coming down from the ridge. The trail, as I remember it now, crept along the side of it, and then across it, and then up to the ridge line.
I thought I could even catch glimpses of the trial that I planned to link up with at the top that would eventually descend down into Mueller Park. I was a couple of hours behind schedule, but after skiing through the park at night many times, I knew I could find my way out of that part of the hike in the dark if I arrived a little late.
Like with so many of then other things we do in life, I made my plan on the assumption that nothing would go wrong.
By the way, I had no cell phone.
As I turned to head up the wash, my family was watching “Babe” at the Matinee.
During the several days that followed I’d wish many times that I’d gone with them.
To be continued…
So many songs have moved me, but these are the three which have done so most recently. In the case of the first two some passing thought or happening reminded me of the song and I pulled it up to hear it afresh and then even replayed it again several times, to re-memorize the words, so I could carry it around in my heart for a while after.
From the first time I heard it, I’ve always enjoyed this song. As a grandfather who misses his distant children to the point of physical pain, I only now can fully appreciate it. Here’s a photo…
…the adult girls and two boys in front are mine. There are also three additional grandchildren, in addition to the ones on each side, that had not yet arrived when this photo was taken. The dog isn’t mine, she’s just a friend to the whole neighborhood. If you are one of those folks who know where I live, go to Google Street View and then turn and look across the street and you’ll see that german shepard with her ball. She invites anyone to play soccer with her. She’s very good at it too. I hope the photo shows up for you, I’ve never tried to embed a Facebook photo into WordPress before. It may take a while to load, so you might want to just read on and scroll back to it later. Also, the pic is a bit older than the date shown.
He is Risen! Do you believe? If you do then I wish you luck watching this video while trying to sing along. I can’t. If you don’t believe in this person folks call Jesus Christ, or believe Him to have been just a man, then at least ponder and believe in the things that he taught. Why? Because they are the rules of a stable and prosperous civilization. It’s taken humanity a good while to gain a little traction on putting those teachings to practice, and we still have a long way to go, but where would we be without the great Teacher who showed us the way? He doesn’t have to be your Shepard, but he wants to be. At least read his words and put them into columns of “Good” vs “Bad” and see if you don’t come away at least admiring Him.
I have never served in the military, but I have spent time away from home on business. This song might not have started out as a soldier’s tale, but the timing and marketing put it there and gave the song a stronger feeling and touched more hearts than a truck driver’s (or author or computer geek’s) tale ever could. War is Hell…even for the loved ones of the soldier. The people that we gather around us join a piece of themselves to us and us to them. Then threads of thought and prayer join us together even though our bodies travel great distances apart. My favorite renderings of this song by LoneStar include recordings of soldiers’ families, but I chose this one particular YouTube video for here because it’s closer to the source copyright-wise. Feel free to spider out through YouTube and find the other in there though if you wish.
And yes, this post ended up taking quite a bit longer than 15 minutes. Oh well. Blame my old, slow laptop. ;-)
Retraction: I owe my oldest daughter, the one in the middle, and her daughter, a rather sheepish apology. She had to remind me via Facebook that she too had a daughter since this picture was taken. I’ve corrected the text of the blog entry to reflect the correct number of grandchildren. I’m sorry for my stupid oversight.
Dancing wind skitters over the cracked concrete.
Boney-fingered vines crush the walls.
Forsaken trees shake horned heads at their bleached roots.
Laughing ghosts of children, long old, sit the swings.
My first installment into the WordPress Writing 101 workshop is supposted to be twenty minutes of random thoughts, so here it goes.
Which way does the world turn? Seriously. Now I don’t mean in the astronomical context. I mean what parts of what we do enhance, advance, improve and grow our civilization and which parts detract, delay, roll-back, and reduce it. The lump sum of civilization does not seem to go anywhere. The degree of civilized behavior at the high-end seems to advance…or does it. As we isolate and remove things that some folks think hold our culture back, we might be ditching some of the things that brought us this far. Yes, Secular Humanists, I’m talking to you.
There are folks who think that any new societies that we establish on Mars and other places should be free and open and devoid of religion.
First of all, you can’t put the words “free and open” and “devoid of religion” together in the same sentence. You contradict yourself.
I also don’t think it would be healthy to try, or even possible to accomplish, a religion-free culture. Religion in its purest form occurs in the heart and many say that it often guides us without us even knowing. No new culture can eliminate it without becoming the very usurpers of thought that have been the enemies of science since Plato.
Further, which patterns of civilized behavior will these new cultures eliminate along with religion? I don’t see anything in science that teaches folks how to protect the family unit, or that inspires most folks to help the poor and disadvantaged. Yes, lots of folks think that is important, but lots of folks don’t, and religion is still the loudest, and practically the only, organized cheerleader of those concepts without which the apocalyptic science fiction that we enjoy today would be right at our heals.
Without religion to teach large groups of people toward civilized behavior, civilization would fall to dust and take the infrastructure that supports our scientific advancements with it and doom future generations to running around naked, stabbing rabbits with sharp sticks in order to eat. On a planet such as Mars, that technological infrastructure would keep everyone alive and then the bones of that colony would join all the other failed colonies through the history of our culture.
My twenty minutes are up, so I’m just going to hit “Publish” now and head off to work. Ok, first I’ll let Zemantha pop in a picture of Aristotle. No, I’ll delete that. I think this “Civilization” movie poster would work better.
What do you think? Offer comments. Some of the most interesting content on this blog has come from long message threads. I know you have something to say. Come on. Let’s hear it.
The journey of Columbus failed. He went looking for the West Indies and didn’t find them. Ol’ Chris made a very serious math error and didn’t know that there was another continent in the way, even after he’d landed on it!
The Voyage of Discovery made by Lewis and Clark failed also. As it turns out, The North West Passage over the North end of the continental United States did not, and had not ever, existed! Climate change might make one some day north of Canada, but that is not a good thing anyway, and pointless since we now have aircraft and stuff.
So those human exploration endeavors fell flat on their original objectives. The explorers found none of the things that their funding agencies paid them to find. They were mistakes and should never have been attempted. Someone should have just taken longer to plan them out. They should have waited to make sure the path was clear, that all of the risks were foreseen and managed, and that they knew everything they were going to find ahead of time so that all that was needed was for someone to simply walk over and pick it up.
If Columbus had done his math right, he would’ve seen that the West Indies were way too far away for him to get there in a single journey with his technology…and that he very likely would die trying it. Then he might have just stayed home and spent his life making maps for other travelers, growing old and fat while telling his children and grandchildren tales about that huge, dangerous, embarrassing mistake he almost made.
Lewis and Clark, after reaching the top of the Continental Divide in Montana, at the head of the Missouri River, saw that what lay beyond was not another river flowing down into a Western sea, but instead row after row of huge mountain ranges as far as the eye could see. They didn’t just shrug their shoulders and say, “Well, alrighty then. That looks pretty hard to cross. So let’s just go back and tell Jefferson to let Mexico have it.”
Has the spirit of discovery died? Have we as a culture grown so comfortable with the known quantities in our lives that we’ve forgotten that part of us that makes us most human? Does the bulk of humanity finally think that we found what we left Africa for so long ago? Have we lost what moves us to…well…move us?
I think that NASA (and their government sponsors) may have become too risk averse to conduct traditional exploration. Robots do great science, but they have no soul and practically no one understands 99% of what they do. When we start to put visual light imagers on exploration spacecraft just as an after-thought then maybe it’s time for human eyes to run out and take a look. The Cupola on the International Space Station almost didn’t happen because Congress thought that a big, fancy, window-seat looking out over Earth was too frivolous for funding. However, such things feed the human spirit of discovery!
I’ll share with you an excerpt from my book, Into the Dark: Escape of the Nomad. In it a former NASA astronaut, grounded by a world filled with apathy and fear, takes matters into his own hands and builds a ship of his own with which he travels to Saturn…
“I’ve seen Earth from orbit and it is truly beautiful–and awe inspiring. It consumes the mind with its size, and with its geologic and atmospheric wonders. But Saturn is almost ten times larger than Earth; with thick, complex clouds completely obscuring the surface of the planet and moving barely fast enough for the human eye to perceive. The colors between the bands, pushed by powerful winds, swirl together in circular patterns that never occur again, and never seem to end, as the rapid spin of the planet mixes its atmosphere like a giant blender.
“And those rings! The many bands and colors in their plaited arrangements show a depth and iridescence that is impossible to see from a distance or in a photograph. They reflect the sunlight as a rainbow, that shifts and rolls before your eyes, changing at every angle, making you hesitate to blink lest you miss the next phenomenal episode in their never-ending light show. Their glistening particles, arranged and aligned as if by an artist’s hand, seem like they’re made specifically to entrance you with their sparkling gravitational dance.
“All this at the same time that the planet’s shear size reaches out and crushes you with a fearful realization of your own smallness. Nothing on Earth can prepare you for it, because the Earth cannot contain anything so in contrast to your size as is Saturn. It looms over you, growing ever larger, like some great doom in a childhood nightmare.
“The eyes, strained by its brightness, want to look away; yet they are ensnared in an all enveloping, wondrous trance; leaving the other senses envious of their torture.”
Will anyone ever describe Mars this way, through eyes of flesh? Yes…but the person who does it first won’t be sent by NASA.
We see a convergence of technology advancements that will very soon lead to a human exploration of Mars, but NASA will not arrive at the red planet on that day. I have watched this closely for years, taking the Jet Propulsion Laboratory training online, listening to their press releases, and I’ve come to the conclusion that NASA will support the development and application of the combination of tech that will empower other folks to send their folks to the surface of Mars. Then NASA will follow in vessels built and tested by others and will stay in Martian shelters built by the locals. They’ll do like National Geographic and that guy on River Monsters, hiring the natives to serve as guides when they visit to do their science. NASA, their sponsors, and their sponsor’s sponsors (the U.S. citizens) have grown too comfortable. Most of us have stuck our feet so deep into the warm, cozy mud of linear thinking and surrounded ourselves with so many music icons and sports heroes and acting idols that we content ourselves to see the unknown through our magical entertainment devices. We prefer to stay curled up, snuggling under a the false blanket of our own delusions of free this and free that.
Mars is hard. Mars is actually really, really hard. To send people to Mars will be the most difficult exploration project that humans have ever undertaken. So it will be done like most of the big exploration projects of old…on the fringes of human awareness…until the discoveries made by the obscure few grab the rest of us by the shoulders and shake us awake.
Here is what will need to happen, in sequence, before NASA ever sends their own boots to Mars…
No wonder NASA doesn’t think they’ll go until after 2030.
What happens when you stand around too long at Wendy’s while deciding what to order? I’ll tell you…someone who already knows what they want slips in line in front of you.
Ironically, only NASA knows how to shoot things off to Mars and land them, GENTLY, on its surface. If anyone unaffiliated with NASA tries to do it first, they run a very real risk of placing a small number of unfortunate people either in permanent solar orbit or at the bottom of a fresh crater on the Martian surface. However, SpaceX, the European Space Agency and even RosCosmos are all affiliated with NASA. Even the NASA contractors of old look like they may have finally started to figure out where all of this New Space stuff is headed and some of them just might survive the revelation long enough to start start competing head-to-head with the new guys. These people all share access to the NASA tech database. What NASA knows they know, or will know long before NASA can fly to Mars in 2030.
At least we know that an Apollo-style “Flags and Footprints” mission won’t work for a Mars. Travel to and from such a place is measured in months and years, not days or weeks. Explorers will spend most of their time on the opposite side of the Sun from us, and so colony-style living accommodations will have to be developed and used for the trip there and the trip back and for dirt-side. No one can live in a capsule for two years and anything that you build that you can live in for two years has another name that we can use for it…”infrastructure”!
But private explorers will build it…not NASA.
A few days ago, I commented here about the upcoming challenges to the future of the Space Launch System and Orion orbiter. In my remarks, I happened to mention that SpaceX‘s Falcon Heavy, that is scheduled to have its first-ever test launch in the summer of this very year, can carry 3/4s of SLS’s capacity but those numbers are fairly rough and seem to move around depending on where you read.
However, then I read this article…
…where it says that SpaceX has a new thrust power for the Merlin 1D engine that they will use in the Falcon 9 to launch the SES 9 telecommunications satellite next month. Not much detail is provided, but it does say that they’ve bumped the rated energy output for those engines by 20%.
Let’s see…5,300 lbs, plus 20% is…well it’s more than 6,300. That seems to put the high-end Falcon Heavy within spitting distance of the low-end of the Mark I SLS…at a meager 85 million dollars per launch!
How much is an SLS launch? Half a billion? And it’s not even expected to fly for the first time (an unmanned spin around the moon) until late 2018? The next flight after that, and the first peopled flight, is planned for 2021 to an asteroid and is already under fire.
Oh, and this also expands the business envelope for the Falcon 9, putting even more market pressure on some traditionally expensive birds that used to be the only choices for throwing those big telcom satellites out to Geo-Transfer orbit. Of course, pushing the edges of the Falcon 9s lift capacity like that also pushes any possible reusability right out the window too, but no one else’s rockets are reusable right now either. SpaceX might still have that capability later this year for less challenging flights…most of those other providers won’t even try.
So, Congress uses billions of tax dollars to build the world’s next human-rated deep space rocket, while SpaceX uses a couple hundred million private dollars to beat that rocket to space with what will soon be human-rated components. SLS teams redesign the reusable Space Shuttle engine, to make any new ones they build more appropriate for a throw-away rocket, while SpaceX puts their reusable engines into what will soon be an optionally reusable rocket. NASA mission planners struggle to fill a half-billion-dollar-per-shot launch manifest for SLS, begging Congress for every penny, while SpaceX signs up a self-perpetuating line of willing customers to fly their payloads for $85 million on Falcon Heavy. Launch providers all over the world work to trim their business models to try and compete with the $1,000 per pound price point, while SpaceX works to chop that price point in half.
What will happen to the 70,000 lb to low Earth orbit, $.5B per launch SLS program the first time a nearly human-rated Falcon Heavy flies a 63,000 lb satellite to Geo-Transfer orbit for well under $100M? If that happens in 2016, will we ever even see an SLS test flight in 2018? Or if we do, will it be destined to be a one-off like Ares? What will happen to Orion when it looses its ride? What will happen to Dragon V2, and the CST-100, and Falcon, and Atlas, all built with a lot of technology gleaned from NASA’s tech database, when they find themselves with the most advanced, human-rated launch systems available because NASA’s new deep-space bird is dead on the ground…riddled with budget cuts?
Over roughly the past decade, NASA has used Congress to help commercial space carefully put the pieces in place that will soon strip Congress of most of its power over the United States’ human access to space…and not just to Earth orbit either, but to the entire solar system. It’s a very good thing that Congress is too clueless to see the knife that NASA and its partners are about to stab them in the back with. I hope that all those folks who build SLS and Orion are ready to jump ship when they see those projects start to sink.
SpaceX is not the only company working on reusable launch systems either, other rocket companies are doing it too, and there are space planes under development as well. What SpaceX does soon, others will do later and build an industry of inexpensive access to deep space for you and me and our ideas.
I hope that your children are learning their math, so they can participate in the new space race that is about to unfold as a $1,000 per pound drops to $800 and then to $500. The number of profitable uses for space that will spring from that, most of which no one has even envisioned yet, will touch each of our lives in ways we cannot yet even imagine.
Where will Orion go? How long will it and the Space Launch System survive? They almost certainly have enough momentum not to suffer the same fate as Constellation. However, with a fickle, micro-managing Congress, budget constraints, changing Presidencies, and now with local commercial competition, the challenges to the long-term survival of the program will be multi-layered.
Currently, the only plans in the works (after test flights) are an asteroid sample return mission, followed by a flight to Mars in 2035…neither of which are funded to-date. The asteroid mission is already widely criticized and in trouble in Congress. Most experts agree that SLS needs a launch frequency of at least one shot per year to support the infrastructure that builds and flies it. A few interesting proposals have been put forward, but NASA can’t seem to afford to build any of them until SLS R&D is completed.
NASA won’t fly alone into deep space either. Russia plans to operate a heavy-lift launcher program also. SpaceX will test launch their Falcon Heavy this summer (and they have super-heavy, extra-wide vehicles on the drawing boards). Will there be enough destinations to keep an uber-expensive program like SLS flying? Remember that Orion is only a crew capsule and SLS is only a launcher. Each mission outside of Earth orbit will also need a specialized, and roomy, exploration spacecraft built to the specific needs of the destination and mission. In order to launch SLS and Orion somewhere once per year, an exploration spacecraft will need to be built once per year as well. NASA has never been good at building one manned spacecraft while operating another. Those vessels have yet to be funded, developed, or built and NASA funding rides on Congressional priorities.
It currently looks like Congress might like Moon missions, and that kind of effort would certainly support annual launches for just the SLS and Orion pair (along with the ESA-built, ATV derived service module that is already in the works), but not for very long. Everyone and their dog will soon be capable of reaching the moon with manned and unmanned vehicles, especially if the Moon becomes commercially relevant.
Perhaps Orion’s add-ons will be built by Bigelow Aerospace. They’ve had test articles of inflatable space station modules, decades ahead of the International Space Station, in Earth orbit since 2006 and 2007 and will launch an add-on module to the ISS aboard the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft this fall. They’ve only had to wait for a better future of human access to space to move forward. The launch frequency to support them will be provided by commercial launch services like SpaceX and Boeing more than NASA, but maybe Bigelow’s involvement will drag the cost and build time of support spacecraft down far enough to keep SLS flying annually.
So what is Congress thinking? Well, They don’t really seem to care if their gold-plated bird actually flies anyplace, so long as the industries that build the bird (and the jobs attached to them) stay funded. They don’t seem to care much that we might end up launching it to the ISS every year just to keep the ball rolling. NASA engineers just give that parental smile and repeat that Orion is a deep-space vehicle and will never be used to support that particular space station. Eventually, public patience with the cost will dwindle if low launch frequency makes SLS a rocket to nowhere.
What purpose will it serve then? Maybe flights to Mars will become routine. Maybe someone will build a moon colony. Once there are people living on the moon or Mars to stay they will need supplies…lots of supplies. Mars is not like Earth, so self-sufficiency for Mars colonies could be a lot further out than some folks envision. Mars carries more in common with a moon, from a human survival perspective, than it does with Earth. Maybe human colonies/science will reach even further out into the solar system where only systems like SLS/Orion can reach them for badly needed and frequent resupply.
I think it more likely that this new launch program will just feed data into their partner database for companies like SpaceX, United Launch Alliance, Boeing, Sierra Nevada and others to carry forward at better prices…and freedom from bi-polar Government agencies. Currently, NASA’s commercial partners are developing several space technologies on their own that NASA did not instigate nor fund directly, on astonishingly short time frames and price tags. NASA is slowly evolving into more of a consumer of technology than a provider.
Here’s the thing…when SpaceX will test launch the Falcon Heavy, later this this year, people will start scratching their heads and wondering at the relevance of SLS. The Falcon Heavy will carry 3/4 the throw-weight of the first-generation SLS, for a much smaller fraction of the cost. When it flies it’ll be the mightiest launch system since the SaturnV moon rocket. It will likely fly paid missions into geo-synchronous orbit before the scheduled SLS test launch. If all goes well, it will definitely accumulate a deeper launch history than SLS, because the cost per launch will be orders of magnitude less and commercial orders are already lined up to fly on it while SLS is only intended to launch once per year. Almost each and every one of the proposed future SLS missions can be designed to fly on one or more other launchers at dramatically lower total cost. Perhaps it will even be SpaceX, or one of their commercial competitors, not SLS, that will carry the first humans to Mars.
So SpaceX will fly a human-rated upgrade of its Dragon spacecraft by 2017, a heavy launch system by the end of this year and Bigelow already builds orbital, long habitation spacecraft. For SLS/Orion to be useful for Mars flights, it probably needs to get there before less expensive systems. Will it really take some combination of commercial space interests longer than 2035, 20 full years, to get humans to Mars? If they get there first, what will we even need SLS and Orion for? Maybe to save their baby, Congress will have to look at, and aggressively fund, some things they haven’t shown much interest for in the past…such as Lagrange point space stations and Jovian moons.
“A lot of things are not easy to solve when you’re trying to break through a new technology right from the get-go,” says Harish Manohara, supervisor of the Nano and Micro Systems Group and principal member of the technical staff at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).
That was a quote from the 2015 NASA Spin-off report on the Multi-Angle Rear-Viewing Endoscopic Tool (MARVEL), a 3D Endoscopic Brain Surgery Camera…made possible with help from NASA. Spin-offs are shared technology arrangements between NASA and the private sector where resources, expertise, and testing regimens are exchanged to advance technology that NASA is interested in. Much of NASA’s funding is spent in this way and, as the quote says, often shortcuts the normal path of discovery which can sometimes cause good ideas to languish.
If you have an idea that could someday help NASA, you might be able to enter into a Space Act Agreement with them where they can help you improve it and make it real. They might even help fund development of your product and even become your first customer or licensee. This could also make you a part of the upcoming space technology race as various NASA partners and commercial space interests look to you as the NASA approved leader of whatever that new device does.
Space exploration has to push the envelope of technology and do both old and new things in new ways. The unique challenges of space almost always have to take a different approach. Often, that different approach takes the Earth-bound version of that tech on a jog around the block as folks strain their brains to make something new happen with old tools. You’d be shocked at the number of things you use every day that were touched by NASA scientists.
Here is a very small sample of some of the 44 new NASA spin-offs highlighted in the 2015 Spinoff Report…
What goes around comes around. You’ve heard folks say things like, “If we can send humans into space, then why can’t we …”. Well now you can say, “I don’t know. Let’s go to NASA and find out!”
I’ve often said that the value of all such things, combined and spread over a generation of people and numerous, networked generations of the technologies, carry more value than all of the money spent on NASA and everything else that they do. The scientific discovery of space, and the cool of it all, is just icing on the space cake. The expectation of more of the same should be justification enough for all of the space technology spending and investment that we can muster. Through it, every one of us are involved in either making, selling, or using space stuff.
Don’t let anyone tell you that money spent on NASA is wasted. Just over a half a penny per dollar of tax money is spent by NASA every year. With it they do all of these things and also lead the world in space exploration and innovation.
If they can do that with just a half-penny, just think what they could do with a whole penny!
I don’t use an iPhone, I like Android, but still. I think it is a good phone and I’m quite sure…I don’t know…could Apple please release some non-functional mockups for these kids to play with?
Really? Really? A 4 lb sledge hammer? The phone be like, “If you smash me, will I not…bleed?”
And is it really necessary to do a test to see if stainless steel can scratch aluminum? I saw him pick up that knife and knew what would happen without him having to go all the way through and to mar the finish to prove it.
I was impressed with how well the phone endured the pain before it died though. We really get to know who the phone really is, right?
Is that really necessary? Children really shouldn’t play with guns. If your going to shoot a phone, do it to an obsolete one…oh, wait. ;-)
Of course, it did take two shots to kill it. Call it the Grizzly phone maybe. “Bear Phone” just wouldn’t sound quite right to the ear. Wrong images.
Of course, fire, I should have seen that one coming. I admit that I did wonder though, right up until I realized the inevitable. You’d be replacing the phone after that anyway, even if it did still work, so what’s the point?
Aaaaand then liquid nitrogen…OK, I have to admit that one was pretty cool, but again with the hammer?
No. This is what happens when good phones meet bad people. Give them all pre-pay bricks to use until they learn how to take better care of their toys. ;-)
I only wish I could put an Android Facebook app update on top of a fencepost and shoot it. :-p
Write it on your calendar.
Yesterday (Dec. 3rd, 2014) NASA made history. Orion (the human-rated interplanetary spacecraft that NASA has been working on) flew in space for the first time aboard a Delta Heavy rocket in a spectacular and beautiful early morning launch. The unmanned test flight lasted four and a half hours in which the capsule orbited the Earth twice and traveled several thousand miles away from the planet before it reentered Earth’s atmosphere at near Lunar-return velocity and splashed down in the Pacific Ocean. The flight has been deemed a success, with the word “perfect” used many times. Once again, NASA has demonstrated that it leads the world in human space-flight, because for the second time it has designed and tested a human-rated spacecraft that exceeds low-earth orbit. Now we just need to go and do it again with people aboard. When we do, the heat shield and other components will have improved even more due to lessons learned from before, and derived from, this flight.
I noticed that the SpaceFlightNow.com LiveStream broadcast of the event had a disappointing 6,500 viewers during the recovery of the capsule. It should have been 650,000, but most folks still just don’t get the significance of this historic flight. NASA was rated #6 on trends in Google News, with at least two or three entertainment industry related issues ranked above it. Those of us in charge of generating interest in human spaceflight and space exploration still have a lot of work to do apparently.
Orion has an undeservedly checkered past. It started out back during the Bush administration as part of a multi-layered “ISS to Moon to Mars” project called Constellation intended to revisit the moon and pursue a Mars exploration initiative, as well as replace the aging and very expensive Space Shuttle program which was scheduled for cancellation due to safety concerns. Over-scoped and badly under-funded, the heavily criticized Constellation program languished in missed milestones and cost-overruns until it was eventually cancelled by the Obama Administration. Any plan to go to the moon was nixed with it as a “been there, done that, got the T-Shirt” kind of thing and the Mars date was cancelled and replaced with a highly criticized and in-specific “someday” pseudo-goal. Space Act Agreement programs already underway to hand-off International Space Station resupply and crew transportation duties to private companies were announced and publicized as the eventual shuttle replacement for ISS support. In the interim, the U.S. would pay Russia to transport U.S., Japanese, and Canadian crew to and from the ISS, and ESA and Japan would operate their own unmanned resupply spacecraft to fill the gap left by the shuttle for cargo deliveries.
Citing illegalities in how the the Constellation program was cancelled without their input, and out of concern over lost jobs among the contractors that supported the Space Shuttle program, Congress bullied NASA employees for a year to keep working on existing Constellation contracts while Congress worked to revive its suddenly dwindling relevance in manned space exploration. This ended in the first and last Constellation test flight of an Ares I simulation vehicle with a mock-up of Orion on top of it. During this time of uncertainty and lack of focus, Congress revived the Orion program (under a highly unmemorable name which I can’t remember) and ordered NASA to start a new, shuttle-component based, Saturn V comparable, heavy-lift launcher program to go with it. This became the Space Launch System (aka SLS, but jokingly referred to by some space advocates as the “Senate Launch System“). Both were cleverly re-scoped by NASA for activities beyond Earth orbit only. Space advocates (with a nudge and a wink) still liked to use the word “Lunar” when talking about Orion, while Congress (also with a nudge and a wink) still liked to use the words “ISS docking” when talking about it. However, many think that NASA has no scientific need to send humans to the moon, and Orion, and especially SLS, are far and away too expensive to fit into the frequent launch routine necessary for ISS support tasks. Space advocates kept using the name “Orion” over and over again until it stuck and NASA re-scoped or cancelled numerous other planetary science programs to pay for it all. President Obama finally groaned and said “Fine!” to the critics of his lack of direction on Mars and offered up a ridiculously distant Mars date (I recall it was something like 2035?) to get us all to shut-up about it. We didn’t.
Orion is a great spacecraft but I hear it won’t fly again until 2018 or so, at which time they plan for SLS to take it on a test-drive spin around the moon and back again with a crew aboard. The next mission after that, as I understand it, will be an asteroid sample return flight around 2024. Will the currently ongoing programs in the new and growing commercial launch industry beat NASA’s current timeline for human interplanetary space flight? I know that their projected budgets are between 3X to 10X less than NASA’s for achieving similar destinations, which always makes things easier to do. So was all of the hoopla and expense over this Orion launch pointless?
Here’s the thing. NASA keeps all of their data on an elaborate database system. All of the organizations outside of NASA which NASA funds, has spin-off and other Space Act Agreements with, or which supply NASA with goods and services, have access to that database. This flight of Orion was not just a “NASA” test flight…it was a “NASA & Friends” test flight. The data which was logged and stored by flight control and on-board the Orion capsule will be seen by experts at SpaceX and others and used to tweek their own designs. This flight will feed data directly into the ongoing, deep, and complex commercial space development effort in ways over which Congress has no control. They can rob funding from commercial space initiatives to try and starve them out, but all of the funding that goes into NASA still feeds data into the development and acceleration of those same initiatives.
I think that Orion’s future as a frequently-used spacecraft is doomed. SLS is too expensive to launch often enough to fund its own supporting infrastructure or get much use out of Orion. Commercial space has implemented timelines on the calendar to eat into Orion’s already sparse mission profile. With NASA’s indirect (if not openly direct) help, SpaceX will fly vehicles to Mars this decade and Planetary Resources could have platinum samples gathered from a near-Earth asteroid in-hand at roughly the same time as NASA’s planned asteroid mission. We’ll see NASA’s lunar-loop test launch, and possibly the asteroid mission, but then folks will wonder why they need to spend money for NASA to do things the expensive way that will already have been done cost effectively by others. The only thing that will save SLS and Orion will be dramatically ambitious missions to the outer-planet moons and such. Those spacecraft will need to be huge but I guess Orion could still serve as an Earth reentry vehicle for them.
But Orion’s place in history is still assured. When the Lewis and Clark expedition, a government funded scientific discovery project spear-headed by then President Thomas Jefferson, journeyed back down the Missouri river on its return leg, it was met by the first of the commercial interests, the beginnings of the country’s pre-1830s Fur Trade industry, on their way out. One of the explorers with the Lewis and Clark company, the now famous John Colter, joined them and went on to discover Yellow Stone.
The same thing is happening now with space. NASA employees are “retiring” into commercial space employment and bringing their knowledge, experience, and contacts with them, while NASA continues replacing those people with new folks and training them in new projects.
Freed from the burden of performing ongoing launch programs, and contracting their launches on far less expensive vehicles developed by private companies, NASA will continue to do what it does best…break new ground. New commercial space development will still be orchestrated, supported, facilitated, and in some cases funded by NASA, while NASA will reach further and further out into the cosmos where commercial efforts can’t afford the risks.
Government, however, thankfully, will no longer get to decide when we go to the moon or Mars or how much it has to cost. Near space will no longer feed pork-barrel politics aimed at dumping hundreds of billions of dollars into a small group of politically-connected companies, nor will it compete with other government programs for funding. Space flight spending will no longer be justified on the basis of space flight spending alone, but will need to actually fly, soon, in order to survive. The price will drop further as new technologies, industries, and companies involving all of us will be born, launch frequency increases, and the tech development curves become self-sustaining. The same folks who are now whining about the cost of space exploration will be clambering to climb aboard. Human spaceflight will touch our lives as often as satellite TV has. We will see people set foot on Mars, and perhaps even stay and live there, during the span of most of our lifetimes.
Someone close to you might even be one of them.
Correction: The next launch of Orion in 2018 will be on a Minute Man ICBM launcher wherein this same capsule that just flew will go up on a very short flight to test the launch abort system. My understanding is that they will take it to maximum aerodynamic pressure and then trigger the launch abort stack to pull the capsule away from the ascending rocket. It’ll be fun! I wonder if they’ll actually trigger the explosives on board the rocket during the test. I should think they would…so that means we get to see the rocket blow up on purpose! I guess the launch after that one will be the SLS swing around the moon.
NASA’s new manned spacecraft, Orion, test launches soon via a Delta IV Heavy. The countdown is holding at 4 minutes because of a fuel valve or something in the rocket. To watch it all live on Ustream, click on the link below.
For additional commentary, follow the #Orion or #OrionLaunch hash tags on Twitter.
Today, instead of that, we in the United States of America can vote.
Now I know that you sometimes may feel like your vote doesn’t count, but it does. Your little vote combines with my little vote and the votes of your neighbors and my neighbors to seat or unseat the powerful. If you decide that you don’t care, then the reasons why you don’t care also apply to groups of other people like you and those votes don’t go out and it can dramatically impact outcomes.
At the end of the day today in the United States, there will very likely be a dramatic shift in power from Democrat to Republican in the Federal legislature. They say that part of the reason for this change is because certain groups of folks, disillusioned by President Obama and the general state of things, will likely stay home and not vote. Ironically, these are the same culture classes of people who, in times past, were compelled to fight and kill and die to protect an unpopular sitting king from power change.
Voter turnout has always affected midterm elections more than Presidential ones. Folks tend to go to the polls to elect Presidents. However, in every election the ballot contains many things of far more direct and daily impact on us than a U.S. President. State legislators, mayors, judges, school board trustees…these people have far more immediate influence over your life than any U.S. President, and those contests frequently turn on just a handful of votes.
I am running for School Board Trustee in a small town. There are five seats up for grabs and eight candidates. Us challengers vary somewhat in our philosophies, the incumbents also. If I’m elected, the schools in this town will feel the impact of my perspective for the next four years. I have no doubt the same is true of the other candidates. Four years is a long time in the life of a child and their stories will be shaped by some folks’ decision to vote or not to vote today. The new Common Core Standards will trigger changes in the schools, and those changes will be put into play by school boards. They will hold in their hands the education of the next generation and future economy of this nation.
In light of that, who cares if there isn’t a U.S. President up for reelection? Who cares if many of the groups who voted for him two years ago feel buyer’s remorse today? What difference should that make when we still have to fill other seats with people who will make the rules and implement the policies that touch our lives most directly? None!
Go out and cast your vote today. I beg you.
We see Garry Piiparinen quite a lot at my house, especially on election years. He comes by to hear what my wife and I think on the issues and to back this or that candidate that he supports. He serves as a Wyoming State congressman. We’ve lived a lot of places, but we’ve never seen this much of our state government representatives. He’s also very responsive to inquires made on social media.
Three months or so ago, as we stood on my front porch having a chat, Garry asked me if I had any local issues that I felt strongly about. I told him that when my son was in high school he was in special education (he has Duchenne muscular dystrophy) and that because of the extra tutoring time in special ed he was only able to take the core “environmental” science classes every year. I said that I thought there should be more emphasis on deeper science topics in the curriculum core. He told me that I should run for school board.
My oldest son graduated out of the system a couple of years ago, but my youngest son is almost halfway through it. He has asperger’s autism and is likely headed for special ed like his brother. He has enthusiasm for science and especially Biology, but struggles with his math. However the math issue for him is more attitude than competence. All he really needs is an understanding of why. I think many people suffer from this with regards to math. I saw a T-Shirt online that says, “Well, another day has gone by and I still haven’t used Algebra”. I’ve seen another T-Shirt that says, “Stand back I’m going to try Science”.
In reading through information that my local school district makes available online, I found that Evanston test scores exceed the national average on math and reading, mostly math, but pretty much tie the average on science. I read about ideas in the works to try and raise the reading performance higher, but without loosing the math emphasis that brings about their success there. “Why not science?” I said aloud to myself. While studying science, one reads at a higher grade level and also discovers why advanced math is important. Science ties reading, math, and critical thinking all together. If the schools work to improve on their performance in science, that will push math and reading performance improvements along for the ride.
In preparing my campaign I learned about the new Common Care Standards that have been recently adopted by most of the United States and found that they contain no science.
That’s right. Lots of English literature but no science.
By the time this year’s kindergartners graduate from high school, there will likely be people studying Mars hands-on. Yes…scientists will walk around on Mars dirt, picking up rocks and looking at them. The projects to send people to do that are already in the works and do not depend (entirely) on governments that loose interest, cut funding, and care only about power. Planetary Science will be the big push with actual, direct, physical access to an alien world to compare to Earth. They’ll find all the differences between Mars and Earth, but the nature of those differences will help us better understand the world in which all of us live. However the current body of researchers will not be enough.
If they find any life, whether it came from Earth initially or evolved there independently, they’ll have an alien ecosystem to compare with our own.
They’ll get a closer look at what drives weather and long-term climate change on Mars. Both there and here scientists will suddenly have a plethora of results to quantify, analyze, name, discuss and integrate into humanity’s understanding of the way things work on both planets. Where will we find all of those geologists, chemists, biologists, meteorologists, etc.? How many people in the U.S. will be paid engineering salaries to do that work? How will those people prepare?
Who will develop the gazillion spin-off discoveries in healthcare, computer technology, rocketry, astronomy, energy, agriculture, and who knows what all else? Who will work in the new industries that those innovations will generate?
If we would prepare our children for the future that I’ve just described, we should insist that our schools teach them science. As parents we should find our childrens’ “science button” and push it. Our schools should provide curriculum and goals to develop those interests so that when children graduate they already have their feet on the path to the higher education they will need to pursue their dreams. That won’t happen enless schools everywhere hold themselves to a higher standard than just the Common Core. To force that YOU must elect science enthusiasts to your local school board.
Wherever in the world you live, vote if you are allowed to do so. Do not let anyone dissuade you. When you vote, vote with the goal of government serving you, not the other way around. Vote with the understanding that things which strengthen all strengthen each.
If you live elsewhere in the U.S., then stand with me and fight for the science competency of the upcoming generation. The Climate Change issue, whichever side of that issue you stand on, would be a completely different discussion if more folks understood the science behind it. We toss around that and a host of other issues every day for which a greater general knowledge of science would reduce the “elitism” and help us all work as a team to guide the direction of our culture for the betterment of all.
I do this all the time. Dogs are shameless cowards because natural selection has bred them to prey on the weak. It is a biological reality. I am bigger than any dog, smarter, and almost as loud. If yelling doesn’t work to scare away a potential case of dog-bite, then I can convincingly howl like a wolf or roar like a grizzly. I can do this while chasing them and I know not to corner them. A dog can run faster than I can, but I can run far enough to keep the animal running away from me until they are well outside their “fine, you are too far away from me to matter” zone.
Is this mean of me? Any mean dog threatening me or my family runs when I play their game. They are better off if they do because I am also armed and know how to kill a dog even if I wasn’t. I wouldn’t harm a dog unless it physically attacked me, I like animals and especially dogs. Dogs usually like me. They are “Man’s Best Friend” and I’d much rather pet a dog than frighten it away or hurt it.
But why the attitude? When I was around seventeen years old I was tall enough, mean enough, sarcastic enough, and had enough Martial Arts training to get bullies to finally leave me alone. Before that I wasn’t. Now you can’t hate a dog for being a dog…but humans acting like dogs are a different story.
I’m not going to involve myself here with either side of #GamerGate, as far as I’m concerned it is an internal conflict brewed out of an industry’s growing pains. I have friends, relatives and fans on both sides of it, culturally speaking, and I agree with their concerns. I will only say that I oppose the stereotyping of women as sluts, which game designers are notorious for. I mention that in the context of #GamerGate because it is one of the sub-issues of that controversy and an issue that I feel strongly about. I would just like to urge all of the folks embedded in all that brewhaha to lighten up and at least pretend to be civilized.
I also won’t involve myself on the issue of gun control…at least not today. It dove-tails into #GamerGate because of a recent #GamerGate relevent event cancellation at Utah State University over Utah’s conceal-carry laws. I have always regarded gun control as a “Teddy Bear” solution (those who know me personally may have heard me voice that metaphor in the past on various things). For now I’ll just link to fellow conservative author Larry Correia, who is more in the trenches than I am on Gun Control. I agree with most of his remarks on the USU stuff HERE.
However, those of you who have issued threats of violence against others are acting like savage dogs. Oh, and by the way, the cop-out “I was only joking” is bull crap (I had to delete some profanity in my comments there) used to justify abusive behavior after the fact, and victimize the the victim further by making them out out as overly sensitive. Tell me please, how can a person receiving a death threat ever know if it is real or not if they don’t know the person who issued it? It is really easy for these tools to cower behind their pseudonyms (fake online names), to scare others, to bring an online conflict into their RL (real life) with death threats, rape threats, mass murder threats, and threats against the safety of their families. It’s really easy for this human scum to sit behind the cover of their own pseudonyms and reveal another person’s personal information (doxing) presumably, but not always with the honesty of explicit proclamations, to give other folks physical access to them for committing crimes. These cyber-barbarians behave like ISIL, but at lease THAT scum has the stones to risk some of their own personal safety for what they do.
My name is William Aaron Housley and I live in Evanston, Wyoming. My public email address is firstname.lastname@example.org. If you disagree with me on anything, I don’t care if you walk right up to me on the street and tell me to my face, and I will answer you to your face and try to treat you in a civilized manner, for such is my preferred way of doing things. If you disturb my workplace we will have the police escort you off of the premises. If you persist, we will have you cited for trespassing. If you commit assault against me personally, I will defend myself. If you survive that I’ll send the police to the ICU to arrest you and prosecute you and throw you in jail once you are physically able to go there. If you attempt to commit physical harm on my family I will defend them physically or legally, whichever is more appropriate to the circumstances. If I catch you in the attempt I will treat you as an invader and end you.
Having revealed all of those things about myself, please understand that for a few hundred dollars anyone can find out anything about just about anyone in the U.S., especially if they have some kind of legitimate legal ax to grind. No person on the Internet is anonymous. Even proxy sites are traceable with a court order from law enforcement agencies investigating crimes. However most of the idiots lobbing that kind of crap around aren’t even smart enough to know how to try to cover their tracks. They think their keyboards and computers shield them enough to protect them from the legal ramifications of illegal behavior…right up until the moment the suits and badges knock on the door. They can usually count on the rules that keep U.S. law enforcement comparatively civilized, but they can’t expect quite so much from the crowd that one joins after the hand-cuffs and fingerprinting. Just sayin’.
Many here online don’t want government to control the online world, but that doesn’t mean that anarchy can rule. Cyber-terrorism violates the rules that everyone signs onto when they access the cloud. If they violate the rules lots of us know how to very easily backtrack them to the server that stores their content and have them deleted with just a message or phone call. I’ve participated in this process at every level at one point or other of my computer tech career. It’s easy. All access to the Internet is, at some level, funded, offered and administered by legitimate business interests that have to obey the law. Any that does not will be shut down either directly through court-order or indirectly through the lawsuits of victims, and that costs them much more than any little slithering piece of human slime is worth.
I don’t have time to blog today, but something Earth-shaking has occurred. I would be very remiss if I continued to talk about space here and not make room for this equally far-reaching discovery…if it’s true.
Don’t get your hopes up, but researchers in Poland seem to have found a way to regrow central nervous system tissue.
Darek Fidyka, a Bulgarian fire fighter, was stabbed. The blade severed his spinal cord. He lost all sensation and motor function in his legs and some in his arms. The father of another paralysis victim, a chef, had started the Nicholls Spinal Injury Foundation which funded some important research that had been tested successfully in mice.
A physician in Poland transplanted Olfactory Ensheathing Cells (OECs), grown from nerve cells removed from Darek’s nose, to the site of the break in his spinal cord. Then he transplanted some nerve tissue from Darek’s ankle to serve as scaffolding for new nerve growth. In the nose, OECs help facilitate repair and re-connect nerve cells after injuries (seriously! Click the Wiki at the top of this paragraph!). In Derek’s spinal cord they did the same thing. In months, sensation started to return to one of his legs. I think I read that after a year muscle tone had started to return. At three years he can walk again with the help of parallel bars.
They’ll do more trials, and it might be a decade or more before this treatment is fully approved and widely available, but I’m sure you understand that the implications of this are staggering. All my life I’ve been told that major nerve tissue just does not reconnect and that victims of various tragic accidents which have damaged their brain or other major nerve cells will never return to a normal life.
Like I said…Earth-shaking. How many are there in the world who might benefit from this procedure? How many other things might this technology branch out into?
See the related articles below and the text links above for more details.
Malala miraculously survived, and the more her enemies tried to silence her the more people heard her voice. The left side of her mouth does not smile anymore, the way it does in this photo, but she talks louder now. She has been interviewed countless times by the news media and even gave a speech before the United Nations.
This week she received the Nobel Peace Prize alongside a prominent Indian children’s rights activist, Kailash Satyarthi. Many were upset that she didn’t receive it last year, but perhaps the current world focus on ISIL has pulled issues like hers more into the limelight. Kailash Satyarthi has fought against child exploitation and trafficking. He may not be as well known as Malala, but I haven’t seen anyone complain about the shared glory. He deserves it.
So…the plot thickens.
As part of the process of the GAO (Government Accountability Office) protest by Sierra Nevada Corporation of NASA’s contract award to Boeing and SpaceX (see last week’s post), NASA has directed both of those companies to suspend work under those CCtCap contracts. The GAO has until January 5th to release a finding in their investigation and this suspension may last until then. No public mention seems to have been made as to whether or not they can continue development under their own funding (and financial risk).
The question is…does it matter? Is this suspension because the NASA contracts and funding is currently up in the air? Or is it just to ensure the fairness of the process for Dream Chaser?
All three of these companies still chase milestones from their earlier CCiCap contracts. This suspension by NASA does not affect that progress or timeline in any way.
All of the funding for these CCtCap contracts still depends on future Congressional votes anyway. So the money was always uncertain.
SpaceX is single-mindedly motivated by Mars and have already said that they are prepared and willing to go it alone if they have to. Commercial Crew is just a stepping stone. If they don’t win out in the investigation (unlikely), then it would slow them down but not stop them. Do you think that there are significant contract award specific activities that they can separate out of their larger plans so they can “suspend” them for three months?
Boeing is a different story. It is clear from the wording of SNC’s protest that it is the Boeing award that they have targeted in their complaint, claiming that their bid was almost $1 billion dollars less. Boeing as a company (the opinions of individuals within the company may vary from this) is in it for the money. Now I know it sounds harsh and unfair for me to say that, because it is true that all three of these competitors are businesses that want the CCtCap funding. However, the term “strictly business” really does trim down the motivational goals for a project. For Boeing, this is just one of many projects that can either benefit the company financially or not. Boeing is not on any kind of crusade like SpaceX and Sierra Nevada to dramatically advance the technology, change the face of how launches are purchased by Federal agencies, or lower launch costs. They make more money, long-term, the old way. The new way just means competition, change, cost-cutting, and loss of dominance…all things that established companies like Boeing would prefer to steer markets away from. If the CST-100 program relies on CCtCap to be profitable, and those funds are cut off, then the project could die at the hands of Boeing bean-counters.
On the other hand, Boeing also pursues future plans with Bigelow Aerospace. Bigelow makes inflatable space habitats and have had their work suspended for a while now because of the current lack of frequent human launch capability. They sent up a demonstration space station a while ago that is still in orbit.
The direction from NASA to suspend work under CCtCap might mean that once Boeing has performed all of their work under CCiCap they might just moth-ball the CST-100 for a little while as they await a final decision from the GAO. That kind of action still generates losses however, so they might instead decide to just bite the bullet and take the risk of continuing work anyway. If they don’t stop developing, and lose the contract, the losses are higher than if they’d stopped. But if they keep working and the contract stays with them anyway, then they prevent the losses (and loss of momentum) that moth-balling the project would have caused.
I can only conclude that the only potential for harm from the suspension would come to Boeing, but only if they step off of the path.
There is probably a list of activities that NASA can’t (openly) participate in during a suspension, but were there very many of those scheduled for before January anyway? If there were, then how many of them are so linear that they affect timelines? SpaceX has multiple, integrated, projects going on that support, but do not directly and exclusively rely on, CCtCap. Actually, now that I think about it, so does Boeing.
What about Dream Chaser? If a lot of New Space folks perceive that this suspension delays the progress of Commercial Space, then it could hurt SN’s public relations…especially if the GAO takes too long, delaying the effort measurably in the process, and then finds against SN. Others might see the possibility of human rating an orbiting space plane by 2017 as worth the headaches and possible delays of a GAO investigation.
I think that the Government Accountability Office, an entity of Congress, is not going to bend over backwards to help the New Space effort. They will look for a path that damages Boeing a little bit, just enough to try and make them look the victim, while trying to damage and delay the New Space effort. I think that means a Jan 5th decision that changes nothing in the substance of the contract awards but still tries to sow further seeds of public doubt as to why NASA and the President are even trying this new competitive approach in the first place.
SpaceX is not harmed or delayed by this, and neither is the Commercial Crew program. The GAO investigation will shed a little light on the decision process for the CCtCap contract awards and that will be refreshing anyway.
With the competition so close, the stakes so high, and the money amount so large, one can understand why they did it.
Sierra Nevada Corporation filed an official protest last week with the Government Accountability Office to trigger a closer look at NASA’s decision to award contracts to SpaceX and Boeing. In their press release announcing the action, they claim that the price of their bid was almost a billion dollars lower than Boeing’s, and comparable in the other selection criteria. The details of the selection data have not yet been released.
The Dream Chaser space plane is a lifting-body craft after roughly the same style as the Space Shuttle, but much smaller. It is built to be launched on an Atlas V rocket, the same as Boeing’s CST-100 capsule, but then land on a runway. It would ride to space on the front of it’s booster rocket, instead of strapped to the side of the assembly like the Space Shuttle.
The main advantages of a space plane over a capsule are flexibility of landing options and a gentler reentry and landing. Space planes are also designed from the ground up to be reusable, at least in theory, depending on how much re-work (turn-around) they require between flights. They’re also way cool of course. Some folks complain a lot about how capsules are a very old idea, and prefer the exploration of more advanced ideas that make better use of current and future technologies. But anything that excites public interest in space increases awareness, encourages our children to do their math, and gets enterprising people thinking and dreaming. Space planes excite folks more than capsules, and that has value of its own.
The drawback is that current technology for the more energetic types of engines necessary to reach orbit requires large amounts of fuel, and everywhere that you go in space involves changing the velocity of whatever weight you brought along for the ride. Well…wings need to be strong. The wings and the structure of the craft itself need to be solid. This makes for a very heavy vehicle, when compared to a capsule, and thus it requires more weight in fuel to move it around. Critics of the space plane concept complain mostly about a spacecraft launching and carrying around all of that extra weight for the entire mission in order to have wings, just to use them for only 20 minutes or so to glide back to Earth at the end of the flight. Also, space planes are far more complicated to design than capsules, and so they are more expensive and time-consuming to develop, build, and operate. You can reuse a space plane, but re-usability has to run much deeper than just re-flying the air frame. As much as we all loved the Space Shuttles, the cost to turn them around was drastically high. You might as well replace the engine and paint-job on your car after every round-trip to work and back. They were also prohibitively, dangerously, complex…high-maintenance primadonnas. They forced NASA to expend vast amounts time, effort, reputation and resources just to keep them flying. In the end, the Shuttle program overshadowed everything else to the point to where it could not be sustained alongside the need to build new vehicles for deep-space. The other problem, which added to the expense, was that it was funded as a government sponsored program reliant on Congress, which cares more about spending money on expensive spacecraft than it does about exploring space. The Dream Chaser does not suffer from most of these problems, but still has to live some of them down.
Sierra Nevada seems to enjoy more popularity in the New Space community than Boeing, but less than SpaceX. SpaceX is the “Golden Child” of New Space while Boeing is the “Golden Child” of Congress. I don’t see Boeing undertaking this effort for the glory of spaceflight alone, so the CST-100 program would likely end if it became unprofitable. Dragon and Dream Chaser on the other hand might live on even if they had to be operated at a small loss, because their companies look to the future profitability that would result from expanded capabilities and the promise of lower priced access to space that those platforms represent. That is the spirit of New Space, not looking to rely (only) on the old space customers of the past, but creating a new market for both the old and new space customers of the future. The New Space cheerleaders that I’ve spoken with and seen comments from, many of whom seemed very upset that Boeing received a larger contract award than SpaceX, seem split on the topic of Dream Chaser being down-selected out of the running. That could change in a hurry if close investigation starts to show that Sierra Nevada is nearly as close to building a viable spacecraft as the other two contenders, and would cost taxpayers $.9 billion dollars less than one of them. I think the New Space community would prefer to polish a space plane for flight, than spend that same money and more on what is perceived (deservedly or not) as an Old Space throwback capsule made by an Old Space hold-out corporation.
I’m referring to Sam Taylor Mullins, the fake name of a plagiarist who stole the book A Bid for Love from a friend of mine, Rachel Anne Nunes, added erotica to it, and then attempted to publish it as her own. Then, when Rachel started looking into the matter, “Sam” started an aggressive mis-information campaign designed to duck responsibility for her actions. Her reviewers, online comments directed at Rachel through blog comments and emails attempting to shame Nunes and discredit her investigation, were all under fake names. She even used other fake names to outright cyberbully Nunes and try to destroy her career.
As it turns out, the true identity of this plagarist has been found. She is (was) an elementary school teacher and many of her fake names are the stolen identities of her 3rd grade students. She also, allegedly, commandeered the names of some of the students’ parents to complain to and threaten Nunes and another author, David Farland, who had screen shots of some of the fakery with the assumed names of the students in them posted on their websites.
Now that the faker’s real name, and (a partial?) list of fake names, has been found out, investigators continue to dredge up a host of additional issues. It seems she even advertises herself as a reviewer (under other fake names) to get authors to send her their stuff for her to review/steal…so authors beware!
If this situation bothers you enough to want to help Rachel Anne Nunes continue this fight, you can do any of the following…
I wrote back in August that I wanted the true identity of this thief ferreted out. The actions of many of you helped make that possible. Thank you.
Finally the announcement has been made. Earlier this week NASA selected SpaceX and Boeing for funded contracts to human rate their launchers and orbiters to transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The United States Congress wanted to limit this next phase of the Commercial Crew Development program (called CCtCAP) to only one provider, but NASA thumbed its nose at Congress and selected two anyway. We’ll see what happens next. The goal is 2017. I’d like to see it sooner. The total combined amount is $6.8 billion. This year’s approved budget for it is $696 million. The providers will be paid the money as they meet each item in the progressive list of objectives and then perform between 2 and 6 crewed launches.
Sierra Nevada and their space plane received no funding, but I think I heard somewhere that they will continue as an unfunded Space Act Agreement project and thus will still have access to NASA and their knowledge base. A slower process for them, sadly, but there had to be at least one partner relegated to this status. It’s not a big surprise really since Space planes are hard to develop and we are in a hurry. Space plane building will continue on multiple fronts and will bear fruit someday.
SpaceX has the momentum, the compelling price-point, and the higher vision of Mars as their goal. Boeing has deep experience and connections within Congress. The SpaceX Falcon 9 means that we won’t have to rely completely on Russia’s RD-180 engine that is used on the Atlas V launcher that will carry the Boeing orbiter. Our dependence on business with Russia for space launches has become…inconvenient. However, the launch history of ULA and the experience of both them and Boeing may be critical to the stability of the upcoming space product and service industry in the long-haul.
If NASA wants to squeeze enough funding out of Congress for two competitors, one of the contractors had to be Boeing. If NASA wants to maintain the initiative away from traditional contracting for launchers and spacecraft, then the other choice had to be SpaceX, who is aggressive enough to elbow tradition and the good-ol’-boy network aside…with brute marketing force if necessary.
However, NASA doesn’t hold the actual purse strings, and the money fight continues. While SpaceX markets to space advocates, Boeing markets to Congress. Congress will not fork over $6.8 billion easily. Congress does not like Commercial Crew Development (CCDev). Congress likes the pork of a single provider working under traditional contracts where NASA (and thus Government) owns every major project that flies in space, so Congress has been trying to funnel this effort down to one provider by cutting its funding because they think that can eventually go back to business as usual. With traditional contracting Congresspersons get pats on the back for spending gazillions of dollars on a small network of huge employers in specific voting districts. Access to space has been subject to political whim and unnecessarily high cost for far too long, but Congress wants to continue doing things that way and rebuild a monopoly in manned spaceflight, so they will continue their efforts to try to starve out this project. NASA knows this and it also knows that space projects involve long-term commitment that the divisiveness and shifting winds of our political process are incapable of sustaining. Commercial enterprises have taken over communications satellite launches with great success. That industry now generates enough money to more than sustain itself and elected officials have no say in its direction, rate of growth, or funding levels. It is a world-wide industry that governs itself based on innovation and consumer demand.
I don’t think that Congress has entirely given up its pipe-dream of some form of the upcoming Space Launch System (SLS)…or at least Orion (the new deep-space capsule that NASA is building through traditional contracting)…being part of transportation and resupply for the ISS either, especially since planners are having trouble finding support for enough deep-space missions to maintain a stable launch frequency for those systems. That’s right, Congress wants NASA to spend $18 billion through 2017 to build SLS and Orion, but there are not enough places for it to go to maintain the massive industrial infrastructure used to build and fly it. Congress doesn’t seem to care that at $500 million per launch the purpose for which it was designed…crewed deep space exploration…is the only thing its good for. That means that Congress has their own dog in the fight for a manned Low-Earth orbiter and that New Space (and with it CCDev) are competing directly with Congressional priorities in an orbit where expensive NASA-owned launchers and space capsules no longer make any sense at all.
Congress is in a bit of a pickle. They can’t really cut into these new CCtCAP contracts without delaying the end of our reliance on Russia to shuttle U.S., Japanese, and Canadian astronauts to the International Space Station. Recent events in Ukraine are pressuring our government and the Russian government to put some space between us. Also, I think that if Congress cuts CCtCAP funding it would likely hurt their buddy Boeing more than it would SpaceX, since Boeing’s CCDev orbiter is an end unto itself, while SpaceX has a larger plan. For SpaceX founder, Elon Musk, this is all just a necessary stepping stone to a higher goal that for him will not be denied.
However, Congress must cut CCDev deep enough to slow it down and let Orion and SLS keep-up with SpaceX if they want to ever see SLS fly. SpaceX has deep-space eggs of its own on the fire which compete directly with SLS and threaten to marginalize it even before its first launch. Falcon Heavy will test fly early next year and will cost $85 million per flight.
I stand by what I’ve said before…there are few Space advocates or opponents in the U.S. Congress…there are mostly just space FUNDING advocates or opponents. For you and I, space is a destination for spacecraft. For Congress, reelection is a destination for spacecraft spending. Orion is a great orbiter, I’ve always liked it and look forward to its first space flight test late this year, but it is owned by NASA and totally dependent on Congress for its funding. It is also way more expensive than it has to be and way too expensive to launch astronauts to the ISS. More importantly, it is way, way too expensive to use for commercial interests like commercial space stations, space tourism, resource mining and a bunch of other things that are waiting for human-rated spacecraft at down-to-Earth prices.
Speaking of expense, SpaceX fans have criticized the fact that Boeing received more money than SpaceX in these contracts. NASA awarded each of them the amount of money that they bid for the list of objectives that NASA expects them to achieve. Boeing is a much larger company than SpaceX and is addicted to the seemingly endless supply of Government money that comes with traditional contracting. This stage of CCDev is where NASA purchases the launches and other activities that SpaceX and Boeing need to perform in order to certify. Boeing’s CST-100 orbiter and the United Launch Alliance Atlas V 402 rocket are more expensive than the SpaceX’s Dragon V2 orbiter and their Falcon 9 rocket. Some Boeing fans claim that SpaceX has to cut corners in order to do the same job for $1.6 billion less, but NASA will absolutely not them do that. Their safety requirements will be just as stiff as Boeing’s. Many of you out there reading this can probably beat me across the finish line at a marathon, but it wouldn’t be because you cut corners, it would be because I’m old and fat. Competition will force all players in a properly competitive human space-flight industry to trim the fat out of their business models and bring their prices down. That will open the door to a host of new commercial endeavors in space that would not be profitable otherwise.
That is why we space advocates in the U.S. must push our respective legislators for full funding of these new CCtCAP contracts. Whatever our respective political preferences in other things, we must join forces and keep up the pressure on our elected officials from now until these certifications are BOTH complete and these spacecraft are BOTH fully tested and flying. We must make it clear that we will tolerate no sacrifices either to the timeline or to the priorities necessary for building a self-sustaining, commercial human spaceflight industry in low Earth orbit and beyond. We need NASA to succeed in their goal to enable multiple providers to begin gaining a launch history of human spaceflight in low-Earth orbit, and with it the notoriety and experience to attract commercial customers. We want something which will grow big and lucrative and drive up innovation and launch frequency, drive down prices, and make space commonplace for each and every one of us. We owe our children and grandchildren a fast-growing new industry to work in like the one we had with the computer tech boom in the 80s and 90s.
“Too radical for Al’Quida” they’ve also been called…not a ringing endorsement for a world power wannabe to be sure.
And please don’t get on about religion. Religion gets blamed for a lot of things it didn’t do. ISIL’s philosophies look to be based on Wahhabism, and Wahhabism, while it is billed as a religious philosophy, made an early rep for itself using “jihad” as just another excuse to kill people, rape their women, and steal their stuff.
ISIL obviously understands how to form and maintain collisions with the tribes and warlords that make up the Middle East. They also know how to scare people into evacuating a city instead of standing and fighting them.
Now everyone is an individual, I get that, but each subculture of individuals trend at certain behaviors and reactions. Maybe ISIL understands their culture, and maybe some of the cultures in Europe, but do they understand the U.S.?
You know…a grizzly bear knows fear, but has a particularly dangerous technique for dealing with it. It knows when something that it fears can just be smashed into not being frightening anymore. It also doesn’t really follow the tit-for-tat rules of revenge either, preferring instead to give the frightening things that it can reach the same treatment that you or I might give an irksome insect with a painful sting.
Then there are the folks in the U.S. News Media. They (and the British) don’t quite behave the same way as their colleagues in other parts of the world. Of course all of the media in industrialized nations know the compassion of the people to whom they tell their stories, and that usually would serve as sort of a buffer between the irksome insects of the world and the grizzlies.
That’s why I think that beheading U.S. journalists, and promising to come over to the U.S. and “jihad” us up if we interfere with them, isn’t a very good plan. At least, it won’t have exactly the same reaction that it seems to have been styled to provoke. People in the U.S. were busy with other things during the founding and first violence of Wahhabism. They know nothing about it and have never quite been taught to handle fear nicely.
Now perhaps ISIL are really just signalling sleeper cells in our country to go to work, but if they think that we will shake in fear and hide under a rock then they obviously carry a lack an understanding of our culture that runs deeper than our ignorance of theirs.
President Obama has made campaign promises to get us out of war and keep us out. I think that he believes in that and is also the kind of man who prefers to keep his promises whenever he can, but he won’t be in charge for very much longer. Also, he seems to like to swing that banner of “Humanitarianism and Protecting American Citizens” of his in a very wide arc when it comes to ISIL…with an eye towards wonking a few heads with it. We’ve all started to notice a certain duality in his comments and policies, indicative of a leader torn in a conflict between promise and inclination. So yes, he appears to be a bit irked. That same duality is also starting to flavor the public discourse in the U.S., which could soon remove the source of Obama’s only remaining restraint to shifting from a policy of “containment support” to “direct eradication”.
ISIL has declared itself to be an independent country. That is a “long haul” sort of thing, so they probably shouldn’t adopt the metaphor of a hornet for their public face, irking the U.S. news media, and making the people of the U.S. afraid of them. This new Wahhabism seems to want to walk on the same road as the first one of old…and will likewise meet with the same sticky end.
Eventually, soon, someone will just decide to smash them until they aren’t frightening anymore.
I don’t need another computer game in my life.
I really don’t.
I was re-watching the announcement of the new Dragon spacecraft…
…when on the list of similar videos, I came across an instructional video by Davis Courtney on a space flight simulator flying Dragon V1 out to the moon.
Apparently this really fun thing has been out for a few years now. I used to fly Microsoft Flight Simulator many years ago (landing is tough! I crashed a lot!) back when computer games were the thing I spent the most time on. I still have it in a pile of diskettes somewhere. These days I haven’t even had time to blog. It’s a challenge just finding a way to squeeze more than five hours of sleep out of each night. I’ve had to dial my writing and convention attendance way back to nearly nill (I did write a 600 word flash fiction on my phone last week during some throwaway time though).
I really, really don’t need another computer game in my life right now. I really don’t. Especially one that I have to sit down at my PC for. Starfleet Commander Extreme or Angry Birds Star Wars or Fruit Ninja are all games that I can play on my Droid 4 phone during throwaway time (no I haven’t tried Flappy Bird…no one has enough throwaway time in their life for that one!).
But this one is SO COOL!
You can fly NASA’s early first missions and spacecraft with Apollo, Gemini, and others.
You can fly futuristic space planes anywhere in the solar system.
You can build your own.
The sky’s the limit (pun intended).
It’s called Orbiter 2010. Google it. Be warned however, it is intended to be as realistic as the old Flight Simulator. You have to learn how to put the craft in orbit and calculate orbital sling-shots to planets and all that. There are great tools and documentation available for to help you, but you still have to spend time learning how to fly. It isn’t dumbed down enough to just plug in your joystick and go.
Plus, it has endless expansion modules and fan supported content.
Yep. A complicated, interactive, real-time, PC based game that appeals to my fantasies and has lots of stuff to learn, eats up lots of time, takes me anywhere, and never ends…
I played it for the first time after midnight last night. I failed several times, but I’m slowly getting better. As I write this I’m re-watching Davis Courtney‘s first “getting started” video with my scary-smart ten-year old son and fellow gaming addict on his first day of summer vacation from school.
Hey, it’s better than him playing Angry Birds all summer right? At the rate at which commercial space is growing, he might get to do it for real some day. Orbiter 2010 is just proactive educational software…right?
That’s my story anyway and I’m sticking to it.
Astronomer Carl Sagan headed an effort to educate the masses about the world and universe in which we live. He did this through speeches, his hit TV series Cosmos, and through personal interaction with individuals such as a young Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Now the boy Tyson, who has grown to renoun himself, has joined with those who partnered with Sagan on Cosmos to produce a new Cosmos. More has been learned about the Earth and cosmos since the end of the old series than was known before it. This new TV series is literally built on the foundation of the old, with the same writers and style as the old, but with a new host, new science, new special effects and new cultural barriers to its message.
In the first episode, Tyson tells the story of the vision of Giordano Bruno, an Italian religious philosopher and controversial figure who aroused the ire of the Catholic Church of his day and was burned at the stake for it. I should note in all fairness that it was a much more self-centered and closed-minded Catholic Church in those days than the one of today. In fact, few know that the Catholic Church maintains its own scientific labs and research groups.
Some have criticized Tyson’s rendering of Bruno, and perhaps that needs to be looked at more closely (seriously, it’s easy enough for anyone to research), but the message in that segment of the program is important. Is there still a credible conflict between science and religion? I claim there is not, that it is a manufactured debate between the more closed-minded and arrogant atheists and theologians among us, sealed in a box arguing with each other.
What some have claimed loudly to be a minority view, that science and religion are compatible with one and other and that a skeptical scientist cannot also be a person of faith, turns out to be in the majority. We just need to shout our views more loudly. This first episode of the new Cosmos seems to have roused a discussion on this topic. This is healthy and necessary to get out of the way. Too many otherwise smart and influential people, who could accomplish so much more for the expansion of human knowledge, are wasting publicity on these hopelessly polarized and discredited positions. The scientists on one side of the debate could instead be teaching the people the importance of math and science for their futures. The theologians should spend their time teaching morality, which really is what the stories in scriptures are truly about. Those topics have become very badly needed by our culture today.
There were other messages, but I’m out of time. I enjoyed it. I enjoyed several parts of it a lot. I can’t wait for the next episode.
The legacy of Carl Sagan, and of Dr. Tyson for that matter, is to educate. So let’s join with them to educate the thinkers and the non-thinkers alike. Then we really need to persuade more of them to think.
In real life, a space elevator to geosynchronous Earth orbit won’t be seen for a awhile, waiting for better materials technology and a little safer orbital debris environment. However, a few days ago I read about a similar effort that can help develop the technology in the interim. The side of the Moon that we always see faces not only us, but also the Earth-Moon L1 Lagrange point, and a company called LiftPort wants to build a space elevator between the lunar surface and that Lagrange point. In case you’re not familiar with Lagrange points, they are areas of gravitational equilibrium between two bodies (stars, planets, moons) in space…places where items follow different orbital rules. You can put something in a Lagrange point and it just kind of hangs there. Different Lagrange points can be used for different things depending on location and the need for stability (some Lagrange points are more stable than others).
Liftport wants to use a lunar space elevator to lift resources from the moon and gently land spacecraft down to it to aid the development of humanity’s space expansions, including the development of an Earth-based space elevator. The company recently launched a letter writing campaign to the U.S. Congress to try and get a NASA funded project going.
It would require a lot in the way of startup funding to move such a project forward of course. They would have to lift a whole heck of a lot of equipment to the lunar surface, something that is still very expensive right now. Will they build a spacecraft that can land on the moon and then build the system using robotics? Or will they send people? Such a project would almost have to have a high-value return (cash crop) already planned out and ready to deliver all the way back to the Earth’s surface in order to fund its operation immediately after it is built, so several Earth-return vehicles would need to also land on the moon. So this is really two separate, expensive, projects. There are such products there, Helium 3 is very expensive here on Earth and existing supply is almost depleted. It might seem like low-hanging fruit since it is believed to be plentiful on the Moon, yet its rarity also limits demand at the moment. Someone needs to deliver more of it here to get that started. Is Liftport’s lunar elevator the best way to launch a lunar Helium3 mining industry? Maybe they can partner with someone else to do the actual mining. Maybe they can get their startup funding through partnerships with a variety of lunar commercial startup interests.
I wonder how useful that Lagrange point really is in comparison to the moon itself as a launch destination and point of origin. It doesn’t really take much to launch from the lunar surface with rockets, and I’m guessing that a Lagrange point is a less convenient routine destination than the moon, since gravity won’t be able to decelerate arriving spacecraft. Is it easier to rover the dust and other things to the space elevator teather for lift, or just launch it from wherever it is straight to space and an Earth-return orbit all in one shot?
It’ll be fun to watch and see where this goes…more fun than talking about Justin Bieber‘s uninvited house guest. Yes, I included that because he’s trending again today and I am shamelessly entering this much more important space elevator topic into that discussion. Shame, shame shame… ;)
Just in case you get lost…
Ok…I did edit it slightly. Curiosity rover took this excellent picture of Earth as a point of light in the night skies of Mars. When I first heard about this I hoped that it included the Mars skyline…and it looks great. I wonder who will be the first to walk along that ridgeline.
Some day…some day very soon…humans will look in the sky and see this sight. In fact, I think I’ll add that to a story I’ve been working on. I’ve written about Mars One and some folks have since talked about it being just another way to die in space, but many have died in the exploration of this planet and we seem to think it was worth it. They became heros. Death and exploration are both part of the human experience. Of course I still hope that no one dies (prematurely) on or on the way to Mars, but how many lives will be saved or improved by the tech advances that will come out of a human exploration of Mars? Which of those advances will help us better understand and explore our own planet? We won’t know until we get it done. Like the lettering on a balloon, everything just grows bigger when we expand our world.
The Mars One effort lands people on the planet to stay. The Inspiration Mars effort wouldn’t land there, but would carry two people in a solar orbit that swings past Mars and then brings them back home. They intend to lauch this mission in 2018.
Red Dragon, a mission design being put together by SpaceX and NASA’s Ames (Sally Ride?) Research Center, would be a sample return mission that is also intended to be flown as if it carried humans. The mission would be proof of concept, to demonstrate that the Dragon spacecraft could deliver people to the Mars surface successfully and safely. It would use no parachute, just the capsule’s retro thrusters. How cool is that?
Mars One in 2024, Inspiration Mars in 2018 , Red Dragon in 2018 (if funded)…did I miss any? These are all aggressive efforts. The opportunity waits only for Mars to swing past Earth again. The technology will arrive before then. If these efforts wait for anything they wait only for support from you.
Would you like to look up and see Earth rising over an alien mountaintop? Think of it.
We live in stunning, Earth-shaking times, when a single research organization makes breakthrough scientific discoveries that cannot be duplicated or corroborated because they have sole access to the object being tested.
We achieve the far-reaching efficiency of a whole team of scientists exploring a narrow footpath, 24 miles long, in only a decade.
Our minds reel to keep up with the fast-moving pace of kicking over a small rock and looking under it in just weeks.
Sorry, my cynicism isn’t directed at the Mars Explorer team. They are doing the best they can, and a marvelous job, with the limited tools that we have given them.
I once listened in on a conversation between a circle of avid cat-lovers, talking about what they liked best about their favorite pet cat they’ve ever owned. I almost broke out laughing when I noticed that every one of the activities and personality traits they highlighted were rare among cats but which existentially define dogs. I almost jumped up and screamed, “For crying out loud people, just get a dog!”
The JPL scientists discuss the health of the Mars Exploration rovers using terms that a physician would use to discuss a human patient. They crow about the long life of the ten-year old Opportunity Rover in terms that we use to compliment the vitality of an elderly person. They think that it is great that the rover has achieved a lot in its life, traveling and taking pictures and discovering new things…and can look back on a decade of service to humanity. Now they marvel that it has kicked over a rock and looked under it. Sounds like the things that we like the most about the Opportunity rover are rare to robots, but are things that people, especially human scientists, do all the time.
For crying out loud people…just send some humans.
In the movie “Ever After”, Patrick Godfrey, playing Leonardo da Vinci, lets Cinderella (played by Drew Barrymore) out of a room that her step mother (Anjelica Huston) has locked her in. He does this by pulling the hinge pins out of the door…something I thought was an awesomely DaVincish thing to do. When the servants marvel at his brilliance, he grins that sly and wicked grin of his and quips, “Yes! I shall go down in history as the man who opened a door!”
I fear that Opportunity, in spite of all of its achievements, shall some day go down in history as the robot that turned a stone. Hidden underneath the “Jelly Doughnut” rock lies more than just some great science, but also the very flaws inherent in the mindset of sending a robot to do a man’s job. It has taken Opportunity a decade, on a world awash in rocks and new things, to find something new hidden under a rock. What if a human boot had kicked over the Jelly Doughnut rock years ago? Think of it. I don’t know how many scientists work on the Opportunity rover team, but what if that same number of men and women actually had been on Mars, making trails in pairs and kicking over rocks, for the past ten Earth years?
Yes, I know that it is a lot cheaper to send robots to the Moon and Mars, and we do wonderful things with them, but where it takes a decade for a robot to look under a rock, it takes a human about, what, as long as it takes him or her to see a rock, pick it up, and look underneath? We rack our brains on the question of how to get a rover in to look at what satellite imagery seems to have identified as something akin to actual running water on Mars, but a human could have just jumped in a vehicle and driven over to check it out. We stress over the fate of the now deceased Spirit Rover when someone could have just gone over and given it a good push, some repairs, and a jump-start. It’s ridiculous!
You get what you pay for I guess. I just think we are loosing a lot of time, money, and opportunity pouring half-pennies into a vending machine that takes dollars, while some culture-advancing prize lies just out of our reach behind the glass.
I had a pleasant surprise this week.
I found out that I’m on five panels at LTUE this year.
Named after the book by Douglas Adams, LTUE is an annual academic symposium held in Provo Utah. In it, writers help other writers learn the trade, build contacts, and work together to succeed. This year the guest of honor is Orson Scott Card. It will be held in the Provo Downtown Marriot on February 13th, 14th, and 15th. Click here for the schedule (at this writing it is not yet ready for public release…stay tuned.
Any of you who aspire to write Science Fiction, Fantasy, Romance, or any other kind of fiction should join us there if you can. Take time off work. Get a babysitter. Quit your job (not really). You won’t be sorry.
My panels are listed below. This is from version 2 of the unreleased schedule and thus is still subject to change. I’ve included the names and websites of my fellow panelists as best as I can find out.
February 13th, 10:00 am–“Write What You Don’t Know”–Bryce Room
I have no idea what this panel talks about. I guess I’ll find out when I get there…which seems appropriate actually. ;-)
February 13th, 3:00 pm–“Apocalypses Throughout History”–Arches Room
300 year droughts, ice ages, super volcanoes, meteor strikes, poison gas rising out of the oceans at night (that generation of dinosaur was boring anyway)…nature has some truly frightening ways of killing off her children. Speculative Fiction is about saying “What if…”, so, what if one of these happened today?
February 14th, 9:00 am–“Signing a Contract”–Canyon Room
What’s more important, getting the money or controlling the destiny of your work? You’ll need to draw your line and sign your name somewhere in the balance between those in order to get published.
February 14th, 4:00 pm–“Marketing Yourself as an Author”–Canyon Room
Published authors are each one in a million…literally! Never has that been more true than now. So how do you stand out in the crowd?
February 15th, 12:00 pm–“ePublishing Short Stories”–Canyon Room
ePublishing is the way of the future, that much is plain. But how to do it? Where do you submit your material? I don’t know as much about how to do this as I would like, which is why I asked to moderate this panel.
Some of these people I know and some I don’t. It’ll be fun. Will I see you there as well? I hope so.
Fellow panelists…I made an honest effort this morning to link to all of your websites, but perhaps I tried too hard. If that’s not your website that I linked to…or if your weblink is here but you’re not who I think you are, please let me know in the comments and I’ll fix it.
Update 2/6/2014–Made some changes as the schedule added and removed some panelists. I also add the rooms.
In another addition, though I can’t be there, Tom Carr will present The Pinkertons at the film festival on the 14th at 4:00 pm. My face will be in two rooms at the same time, once in the Amphitheater on the screen and in person in the Canyon Room at the “Marketing Yourself as an Author” panel. Of course, you *could* download and print pictures of me off of my Facebook page and pass them around the symposium so that I could be many other places at once–but I never suggested it, no not at all. ;-)
On Monday, only about a month after their last launch of 2013, SpaceX used one of their Falcon 9 rockets to deliver a Thai communications satellite into geostationary transfer orbit from the same launch pad. From there, the satellite will move itself into its assigned slot in Geostationary orbit (GSO), which is quite far out where the orbital period is exactly 24 hours and causes the satellite to appear to “hover” over a specific spot along the equator of the planet so that folks can aim stationary satellite dishes at it. This was their first launch into that orbit and one step closer to Elon Musk’s goal of eventually launching a rocket to Mars. Mars won’t be reached by this rocket though. Every launch, each higher orbit, adds to their launch history and knowledge base to help them better refine their rockets and launch support. Increased launch frequency also lowers overall cost per launch.
The Falcon Heavy will be their Mars rocket, as well as the launcher for even larger payloads into those higher Earth orbits like GSO. Some time this year they plan their first two launches of the Falcon Heavy and they already have signed contracts for Falcon Heavy launches for the Air Force and for IntelSat.
What will this do? Well, they still intend to maintain their $1000 per pound price tag to Low Earth Orbit. In fact they plan to reduce the cost even further by developing a vertical power-landing ability for their first stage, and maybe even the second, and then reusing the rockets. They say that this will be even easier with Falcon Heavy, because the two strapped on boosters leave the rocket sooner than with the Falcon 9. They compete with long-standing market leaders in the heavy-launch industry who are now struggling to figure out how to match the SpaceX price point.
I want to talk about that today. Their price also tops any launch vehicle that Governments, notoriously wasteful, can contract and build. China has already told Elon that they can’t compete with him. When the Falcon Heavy launches for the first time, SpaceX will be in direct competition with NASA’s upcoming Space Launch System (or as critics of the SLS have called it, “Senate Launch System“) and will fly in space while the SLS is still a paper rocket. How that will play out politically will be fun to watch. NASA (or maybe Congress) continues to refuse to fund the SpaceX’s proposed Red Dragon mission to Mars. I think they’re snubbing SpaceX for Mars missions because they don’t want the Falcon (and the Dragon capsule) to get there before SLS and Orion. Of course, the entire Falcon Heavy program costs less than even one SLS launch, so it in today’s tight budget environment it is only a matter of time before they see the light. It’ll just take that one launch of of FH later this year to get the ball rolling.
The SLS will be the biggest rocket in history, but until it launches Falcon heavy will have the capacity to launch the most weight to orbit of any vehicle currently in operation, more than the Space Shuttle ever did and second only to the now-extinct Saturn V. According to the SpaceX Wiki…
“While the official specifications of the new launcher limits LEO payloads to 53,000 kilograms (120,000 lb) and GTO payloads to 12,000 kilograms (26,000 lb), reports in 2011 had suggested higher payloads beyond low Earth orbit, including 19,000 kilograms (42,000 lb) to geostationary transfer orbit, 16,000 kilograms (35,000 lb) to translunar trajectory, and 14,000 kilograms (31,000 lb) on a trans-Martian orbit to Mars. As of January 2014 SpaceX’s website states that the payload to GTO will be 21,200 kilograms (47,000 lb)”
Trans-Martian is a solar orbit that jumps a spacecraft from Earth orbit out to Mars orbit, SpaceX will be an Interplanetary launch provider and will then drop the price of such launches astronomically (yes, pun intended ;). They will place Moon and Mars launches well within the reach of countries, self-funded commercial enterprises, and variously funded research projects…for which Interplanetary travel would not be feasible at the ridiculous prices of the standing “old school” launch service providers who’s pricing structure depends on “GSA” type Government contracting for their bread and butter. It also takes the progress of Interplanetary space flight out of the hands of the U.S. Congress forever, since Government is incapable of cutting waste and lowering cost and because Government-built rockets will no longer be necessary. The SLS and the Congressionally mandated budget, suppliers, schedule, and politics that go with it, will become completely obsolete overnight and forever. This will waste the many, many billions of dollars that have already been spent on it…dollars that are currently being strip-mined from Interplanetary and Interstellar research projects throughout NASA to feed the SLS dinosaur that we would never have been able to afford to fly.
It’ll also give the United States a monopoly in a global, multi-trillion dollar export industry that relies on high-paying, high-tech engineering jobs here at home.
This is what will happen over the next few years. The first Falcon Heavy launch to Mars will be pushed by the need to try to meet the next Mars launch window (when Earth and Mars align with each other in orbit). Yes…I think that once the design is considered reliable and solid, Elon will try to launch a Falcon Heavy rocket into that window, even if he has to spent every penny of his own personal fortune to do it.
The Falcon Heavy will make 2014 a very big year in space.
That’s right. What you see is a really big gas giant planet in orbit around someone else’s sun. It is not a computer simulation or an artist’s rendering of what might be, but an actual world, Beta Pictoris b, bathed in light from its own honest to goodness star, Beta Pictoris. Cool huh? Thanks go to the Gemini Planet Finder.
Now go out on a clear night and look to the East a couple of hours after sunset (sometime soon after I write this). See that bright light in the sky? That is Jupiter, the largest of our own gas giants.
It must shepherd a number of moons too, tugging them along with it like a flock on its long journey around the star. You can’t see them, but you can think of no reason to imagine that they’d be missing. The planet would appear lonely without them.
It also has Lagrange points that it shares its orbit with. It is fundamental to orbiting bodies and all of the planets that orbit Sol have them. Picture, in your mind’s eye view, some rock stuck there in the planet’s sky just tagging along, suspended as if by an unseen hand.
Somewhere, much nearer the star, shrouded in its brilliance, are the rocky little places that we rather euphemistically call “Earth-like”. None of them look exactly like Earth of course, and Beta Pictoris is very young so you won’t find anything even remotely like Earth orbiting it. But if but you close your eyes you can make one! Form a blue globe, splotched with interconnected browns and greens for land masses. Put small, irregular patches of pure white at opposite ends, and surround it with willow wisps of clouds twirling and dancing close over its surface.
Now zoom in close. See those two little people down there, straining their necks to look up at the sky?
What are they doing there? Why did they stop to gaze at the stars?
Tell the world their story. ;-)
Ok. I try not to talk politics much here in my blog, even when things annoy me. I use my Facebook page for that. But come on! This has steam escaping my collar is puffs.
Black conservatives in the U.S. are villified and called “not really black” by the African American community and the Liberal Left, and for what, so that bigots like Melissa Harris-Perry, Pia Glenn, and Dean Obeidallah can make heartless cracks about Mitt Romney‘s adopted grandchild being the only black in an all white family, saying that the family looks like the Republican Party?
Excuse me? So who does the child in this photo represent to these people? Colin Powell? Condolisa Rice? Prior to Barack Obama, they were two of the highest ranking African Americans to hold an office in the Executive Branch, and were both appointed by Republican administrations. To my knowledge (and please correct me if I’m wrong) Bill Clinton only hired blacks as speech writers when he was President. I’ll admit that there are some in the Republican Party who still hold on to their age-old bigotry against African Americans, but the rest of us treat them as people…as equals, while the left treats them as a locked-in voter demographic, to be kept down in poverty and subsistence so that they can be controlled by Democrats. The Republican party was founded on an anti-slavery platform while Democrats today still treat African Americans as slaves to keep themselves in power. Equality for blacks is automatic in the eyes of most Republicans, while the Democrats seem to give them nothing but lip service.
Ben and Andelynne Romney did a good thing by adopting little Kieran. These snide comments from the Liberal Media say more about them and the racist roots of the Democratic Party than they do about Mitt Romney, his family, or the Republican Party.
I’ll get off of my soap box now.
Update: Melissa Harris-Perry apologized, at least for attacking Mitt’s family on-air. I’m good with it, but she didn’t admit to or apologize for her own racism. There is the content of the attack that needs to be publicly…enlightened upon. Liberals have isolated the African American demographic from Conservatism by belittling Black Conservatives and they have done it to maintain a cultural separation along racial lines and a reliable voting block for themselves. The fact that these comments from within the media ever occurred at all still makes us all wonder who the racists in this discussion really are. Melissa should have opened discussion on this by apologizing for her own racism. Apparently, she and the left still aren’t yet ready to throw any light on that. Frankly, I’m not surprised.
It’s that time of year again.
I’ve updated the YouTube Christmas Music playlists that I built in previous years, removing deletions and adding a few to replace them. The Kathy Mattea video, “Mary Did You Know”, that kicked off this 2 year long habit of mine (and cover track for my Christmas Favorites playlist), was deleted this year. So I went searching and found another copy of it to add back in and then moved it up to the start where it goes. The slide show playlist from last year lost a few titles too, but it looks like folks are making and posting those a lot faster than they disappear. I’ll just need to keep looking and adding. I want to double its size so that listening to it repeatedly doesn’t sound to…you know…repetitious. ;-)
This year, I’ve added two new lists.
Christmas Music Videos
During this past year or so I’ve become a big fan of YouTube music videos performed by The Piano Guys and Lindsey Sterling. The advantage of these to a playlist is that these people are native YouTubers and the videos are posted by them, on purpose, instead of by fans posting without permission. Therefore, these videos will endure and won’t drop off of the list. I found both of those two artists when I was mesmerized by “O Come, Emanuel” by the Piano Guys last Christmas. Earlier, I had seen a brief clip of Lindsey Sterling in an advertisement for something else and wanted to see more, but didn’t know who she was or where to find any more of her work. Then while going through Piano Guys postings, I found her in one of their videos–the fun-filled Misson Impossible Theme Song that they made together. Anyway, their videos do not have the home-movie flavor so common to YouTube. They shoot multiple takes from different angles and often with different backdrops and wardrobe and then mix them together in a cool way while the music rolls right through. It stands right up alongside material produced by pros with a lot more money to throw around. This is why I decided to put together a playlist of Christmas videos by them and others. It’s kicked off by two Piano Guys videos and two Lindsey Sterling videos, but I’ve fleshed it out with other professionally produced (or professional-looking) music videos by other artists of various arrangement styles. Eventually I will refine it more, but I need to find enough of that type of material to fill it with before I get too picky. The cover is not “O Come, Emanuel” however, but an innovative arrangement of “Angels We Have Heard on High” that they released last month. In it, several guys stand around the piano and play it like a stringed instrument. Way cool.
This is a bit of a toughy. The entire purpose of these playlists was to be able to just set up a computer and walk away and have it fill the area with the Christmas Spirit while I go off and do something else. Well, some folks have put together whole videos with a collection of tracks played against slides and/or video snippets of Christmassy scenes. Some of these are as long as four hours and each plays a bit like my slide show playlist. I’ve managed to collect about a dozen in then list so far, however cuts like these seem to have a short lifespan. They are bound to contain copyrighted material somewhere which someone notices eventually. When that happens, the powers that be don’t delete the video, they replace the entire four hours with dead air, played over a black background with text that explains the infringement. I guess what I’m saying is that I’ll need your help keeping up with this list because it’s going to be higher maintenance than my other ones. If you see a dead-air video on it, just let me know somehow and I’ll remove it. The playlist won’t miss it, since I probably have about a full day’s of material in the list so far. Also, some of these tracks are a little off-the-track, but I haven’t finished vetting all of the songs in some of these videos (for obvious reasons). So have patience while I find time to play them all the way through for myself.
BTW, when I first started doing this, some mobile YouTube apps didn’t like playlists and I even had trouble posting a link to a playlist in WordPress so that it played the whole list and not just the cover video. Now, both mobile apps and WordPress are playlist smart! We are going to have lots of fun with these in the future.
For an easy list of all of my playlists, go to my YouTube page by clicking here or just search YouTube for whousley.
O come, O come, Emmanuel
And ransom captive Israel
That mourns in lonely exile here
Until the Son of God appear
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to thee, O Israel.
O come, Thou Rod of Jesse, free
Thine own from Satan’s tyranny
From depths of Hell Thy people save
And give them victory o’er the grave
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to thee, O Israel.
O come, Thou Day-Spring, come and cheer
Our spirits by Thine advent here
Disperse the gloomy clouds of night
And death’s dark shadows put to flight.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to thee, O Israel.
O come, Thou Key of David, come,
And open wide our heavenly home;
Make safe the way that leads on high,
And close the path to misery.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to thee, O Israel.
O come, O come, Thou Lord of might,
Who to Thy tribes, on Sinai’s height,
In ancient times did’st give the Law,
In cloud, and majesty and awe.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to thee, O Israel.
Many years ago, during my college days, I saw a magazine cover article on India’s space program. This was back when that country first started providing Earth-orbiting launch services shortly after that industry first began. It showed a man leading an ox-cart full of hay down a jungle road, back-dropped by a rocket launch.
Now Earth-orbiting satellites are a huge industry and India has become one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Their policies concerning debt mean that they have weathered the last couple of recessions better than most, but their leaders admit that they still have two populations, and one of those remains very poor. The conflict in Kashmir rages on as Islamic fundamentalists and Pakistan struggle to establish Shiria Law in the India’s Muslim-dominated North. The country is also uncivilized in several other serious ways that I would like to see reformed. Some look at India’s list of problems and say that they can’t afford a space program.
Earlier this week, the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) launched a Mars probe which some call MOM (for Mars Orbital Mission) or Mangalyaan. Earth’s oceans, Solar orbit and the Mars surface are littered with the bones of failed Mars spacecraft, so this probe still has a long way to go yet before anyone can call it an unqualified success. Be that as it may, each milestone achieved makes history and forges a new future for India. If it arrives in Mars orbit successfully, it will perform some new experiments that will add to the world’s knowledge-base regarding the atmosphere of Mars, though its primary mission is just developing and testing the capability to get there.
Here’s the thing. This knowledge-base of which I speak is not just some numbers on a computer printout somewhere, it resides in the expert-base and technical infrastructure of the country. The experience that they gain, the capabilities that they develop, and the reputation that they forge will be resources that other people the world over will need going forward. Knowledge is power, and power is position and opportunity and in the new space race that positioning is more valuable than gold. At a measly $69 Million U.S. for this mission, India is spending proverbial pennies on the dollar to possibly become the fourth Mars-capable country of the world.
That is the reality and anyone who thinks otherwise has blinders on. Even while Mars is still nothing more than a scientific interest, knowledge about how to get there already brings positive returns on investment. However, at some future, as yet unknown, date someone will discover something about Mars that is unique, valuable, and unavailable here on Earth. It is…well, I don’t know yet, but it will trigger a fervor that historians will later liken to the Gold Rush in the United States. Everyone with Mars experience will then become part of a new industrial revolution that will produce unimaginable wealth for the few infrastructures around the world that possess Mars expertise, and provide high-paying, high-tech jobs for millions of people. India wants to be one of those few, and rightly so.
I hope that their probe achieves Mars orbit. Such efforts cost such a small amount in comparison to their benefit. Kudos to India for investing in their future…spending money paying people who will build a hope for the country and its poor.
In August of 2012. NASA landed a highly advanced rover the size of an automobile on Mars using an innovative, one of a kind, rocket-propelled sky-crane. Hitting Mars orbit with anything is not easy and
NASA is the best in the world at doing it. This effort was historic, highly successful, employed (and continues to employ) large numbers of high-paid engineers and support staff, and raised the technology level for such landings significantly not only for Mars but for other targets all over the solar system. The science being performed by the rover is unprecedented both in quality and quantity and has redefined our view of Mars. The effort is so successful that they are planning to land another just like it and some talk about using the sky-crane for a different mission as well. As usual, there are also a bunch of benefits in direct and indirect spin-off technologies, as well as increased interest in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) fields among the rising generation as a result of Curiosity.
The total cost of that project, spread out over 8 years, has been around 2.5 Billion U.S. dollars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Science_Laboratory). About 20% of that was the cost of the launch. It works out to about a dollar per year per citizen.
By contrast, in 2012, the same year that the rover landed, the average DAILY interest payments on the U.S. national debt were just under 1 Billion U.S. dollars. (http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/ir/ir_expense.htm)
Which pays more?
It is now obvious to me that Hollywood agrees with my earlier post here (The Incredible Shrinking Genre) about the importance of Family Friendly entertainment. I say this because they appear to be willing to tease folks with it…case in point, Marvel’s Agents of Shield.
Sorry about the mild spoilers ahead.
I need to go back and find the pre-release clip, where one of the folks involved in the project (producer or actor or somebody) calls this series “family friendly”, so that I know not to trust anything else that person says. The first several episodes walked on the edge with some of the actions, clothing and dialog for the character Skye. But in the latest episode they crossed that “here is what we are willing to do” line, showing way too much skin when she goes to bed with an old friend and hacker partner of hers, a character so shallow that I can’t even remember his name (he is a liar, even to her, as he risks outing her to S.H.I.E.L.D. in order to make a million dollars, then he uses their intimate relationship to distract her, then when they finally show her what he did he gives her the classic “it was all for us” B.S.).
Also, Agent Coulson uses a popular phallic euphemism to describe the personality of a certain flame-throwing and out of control superhero (another very poorly developed character) that is trying to kill them. Then that super hero very vividly and explicitly torches the evil redhead from the first episode to a crisp.
I still like the show, in spite of my annoyance with their willingness to go so far over the top on sex, dialog, and violence after claiming to emphasize making the show “family friendly”. The movie Avengers, from which the series is a spin-off, seemed to make an effort to stay within the lines and be a show that I could have in my home. But Agents of Shield doesn’t seem to want to follow that winning pattern, but instead wants to go more the direction of the Iron Man movies…and maybe even a little bit beyond.
Now I know that Agents of Shield doesn’t want to be called a “Children’s Show”. I get that. Some people will say “Children’s Show” any time their preferred higher levels for sex and violence aren’t met. I get that too. But the producers of Agents of Shield are smart enough to know that children’s shows have child protagonists, solving children’s problems in child-like ways…and maybe talking animals ;-). The Agents of Shield story line is about adults solving adult problems in adult ways. This can be done in such that an adult can still watch show with a child in the room. Many very successful shows have done this. Any adult who thinks that explicit sex and violence should be the only difference between children and adults never actually grew up themselves and “Adult Programming” as the world defines it suites them ill.
Agents of Shield; you released advertising material at the start of your series that used the words “Family Friendly”, but the episode entitled “Girl in the Flower Dress” was not. No one should label what is easily PG-13 content “family friendly”. You didn’t have to say, “Family Friendly” but you did. Some viewers have started to question the quality of your writing and character development as well. If it isn’t family friendly, and the quality of the story is poor, then you will have no value.
Straighten up your act or I am through with you.
I’ve been wanting to talk about this for a while now.
I was once given two months to vacate a house that I was renting. It was pretty scary because I rally didn’t have anywhere else to go. When I finally did find a place it was…like…right on the edge of the deadline and I didn’t want to get locked out. Moving myself out quickly, I gave myself a back injury that persists to this day.
Around one year ago, scientists found a comet inbound.
Now, let me be clear first, because I don’t want to frighten anybody. Comet ISON (C2012 S1) will NOT hit us. It’ll miss by something like half the distance to the sun. Back yard astronomers, as well as the pros, scan the skies with photography every night, looking for movement. Then, when it is found, they can track its motion and it really doesn’t take much to nail down where the object is headed. I don’t know how to do it, but lots of folks do. The methods and math aren’t simple, but they are widely known and very straight forward, so as to make it impossible for governments to lie to us about such things. Sure, orbital mechanics carry some variables, but none of those are anywhere near large enough to matter much against the momentum of an object this large, moving this fast, over such a short period of time.
But ISON’s size and speed…and the short time since its discovery…are important for another reason.
What would our lives be like right now if they’d done their magic math and calculated that ISON would smack us dead-on? What if we had lived out this past year with the reality of a major impact event coming late this year projected to wipe out civilization?
Somebody discovered this object on September 21st, 2012. Prior to that we possessed no knowledge of its existence. ISON is thought to be around three miles (almost 5 Kilometers) across. That probably isn’t big enough to wipe out a species as versatile as ours, but it’s enough, more than likely, to bomb us back to the stone age.
Some folks on the Internet discussed the possible damage here. There is even a cool BattleCalc style damage calculator that Purdue University put together here.
You see, infrastructure is a touchy thing. Infrastructure means all of those layers of technology that we rely on to allow us to continue to go to work everyday to build or prop up more layers of technology to rely on. The knowledge base that supports it all is really only one or two generations of hunter-gatherer away from being forgotten. A major, planet altering event like a class 8 caldera eruption (long notice and unlikely) or a celestial impact (umm, potentially SHORT notice), that kills enough people could cause the network of skills that supports our current population to come unraveled like a moth-eaten sweater. Ten years of that would kill off most of our species through starvation and strife, because the land really can’t support more than a certain density of hunter-gatherers. Then, after one or two generations of eating rabbits, twigs and berries for breakfast, lunch and dinner, the memory of all we see around us today would fall to dust.
“Mommy, what’s that?”
“We call it the ‘food tower’. See that cat walking in that fourth square opening on the third level? Take careful aim…Good Girl! Now climb up there and get it and I’ll teach you how to dress it out for breakfast.”
Three mile wide comet impacts do that sort of thing, and it could happen someday…just one year after astronomers look at their charts some morning, cuss, and spill their coffee.
Please understand, one year is not enough time to do anything about an incoming killer impact, so it’s a really good thing this comet won’t hit us. It’ll pass us like so many others, just a cosmic shot across our bow.
So we still have some time.
I don’t know exactly what to do about it…but somebody needs to.
An armed man with a gun, hiding behind cloth and camera, brags and vows to shoot an unarmed child and calls her a coward, not realizing that he paints a picture of a coward himself. It does not look like they have learned their lesson, what they have done by shooting her. It was stupid to shoot her before, it is more stupid to talk about doing it now and it would be the highest of stupidity to succeed in killing her later. That shot heard around the world is now etched in the record of history and heaps shame upon the names of the Taliban and all of its members.
She lives on and she speaks on. She spoke before the United Nations in July. She published a book today. She might receive the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday. There are few people in the world right now who are as big as Malala Yousafzai. I wrote here last year that by shooting her the Taliban amplified her voice beyond their pathetic reach. Killing her would only make her a martyr to her cause, and martyrs can only be killed once.
They say that she dishonor’s Pakistan. Those in Pakistan who shoot children dishonor themselves; she is only a voice crying out of the darkness against them. They point guns directly at innocent, weaponless, harmless people and then and call other people cowards. They murder children in cold blood and then compare those deaths to those caused by misguided American bombs aimed at themselves. They call Malala a puppet of the West, but they are puppets of false priests, corrupt and immoral tyrants, and even Jinn. They claim they speak for God, but the tears of God fall upon the people who are abused by the Taliban and their ilk all over the Arab world. They say that those who speak out against them speak out against God, Islam, and Pakistan, but I hear the voices of all of those and they condemn the extremes of the Taliban.
I read today that Malala’s book is for sale in Islamabad, proving that the Taliban are too small even in Pakistan to stop this girl, her book, or the symbol that she has become. The atrocities that the Taliban have committed in darkness are now seen under the lights of millions of bookstores, librarys, coffee tables, and Kindles the world over and can never be recalled by any Islamic radical group or anyone else. What will happen when thousands of little girls all over the Middle East see her example and figure out that violence can only blot out those names of the silent? They’ll will go to Blogspot, or WordPress, or Facebook, or Twitter and begin telling us of their lives. There aren’t enough bullets in the world to stop them all.
The world is growing smaller and the eyes of civilized people can now see much that was hidden from their view through the centuries. The faces of nations have recoiled in horror over the acts of the Taliban and those like them. But the sun has now begun to set on the ruthless reign of radical Islam and it is none too soon.
I usually don’t share personal political opinions here. I won’t start now.
However, I think that the issue described below could use some…sunlight…as it were. I think that my personal viewpoint will be served by this. I have read a number of posts on this topic that, now that I’ve read up on it directly from the source, seemed obvious to me that the posters were clueless and hadn’t actually read the relevant document.
The topic is the United Nations treaty that Secretary of State John Kerry signed earlier this week on the International proliferation of weapons.
On the surface…well, there I go starting to get all political. I’ll just post the text of the treaty and encourage you…urge you…to read it. Unlike anything our Congress might publish, this is only thirteen pages long, about the length of a short story. It is also worded simply, for ease in translating in multiple languages, not the dry and complex legalese that you might expect.
I’ve reformatted it from the original PDF that I found here, for your convenience, so I apologize for any formatting errors. I would have just posted the link, but WordPress tells me that most of you don’t actually click on those very often…and this issue is important. It has probably resulted in the longest post ever on my blog, but I think it’s worth it as this issue touches (or will touch) everyone who reads it.
-If you are pro gun-control in the U.S., particularly national gun registration, then you might read this and say, “Yay!”
-If you are against the U.N. becoming more powerful, then you might say, “Booo!”
-If you are against the proliferation of arms to terrorists, then you might say, “Yay!”
-If you are against the slow leakage of U.S. citizen’s rights, or concerned about privacy rights with respect to the activities of the U.S. National Security Agency, Dept. of Homeland Security, or other non-elected government agencies, then you might say, “Booo!”
Whether you agree with the current U.S. Presidential administration that this treaty should be ratified, or you agree with the majority of the U.S. Senate that think that it should not, YOU must read it, so that YOU know what it says. It is too short, to easy, and too important to neglect. This is a highly emotional and polarizing topic, with lies abounding on both sides. You cannot have an opinion about it by just reading the comments of other people, not when informing yourself is as easy and scrolling downward.
Ladies and gentlemen…presenting the Final United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty.
United Nations A/CONF.217/2013/L.3
General Assembly Distr.: Limited
27 March 2013
13-27217 (E) 270313
Final United Nations Conference
on the Arms Trade Treaty
New York, 18-28 March 2013
Submitted by the President of the Final Conference
The Final United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, Adopts the text of the Arms Trade Treaty which is annexed to the present decision.
The Arms Trade Treaty
The States Parties to this Treaty, Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,
Recalling Article 26 of the Charter of the United Nations which seeks to promote the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security with the least diversion for armaments of the world’s human and economic resources,
Underlining the need to prevent and eradicate the illicit trade in conventional arms and to prevent their diversion to the illicit market, or for unauthorized end use and end users, including in the commission of terrorist acts,
Recognizing the legitimate political, security, economic and commercial interests of States in the international trade in conventional arms,
Reaffirming the sovereign right of any State to regulate and control conventional arms exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional system,
Acknowledging that peace and security, development and human rights are pillars of the United Nations system and foundations for collective security and recognizing that development, peace and security and human rights are interlinked and mutually reinforcing,
Recalling the United Nations Disarmament Commission Guidelines for international arms transfers in the context of General Assembly resolution 46/36H of 6 December 1991,
Noting the contribution made by the United Nations Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects, as well as the Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, and the International Instrument to Enable States to Identify and Trace, in a Timely and Reliable Manner, Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons,
Recognizing the security, social, economic and humanitarian consequences of the illicit and unregulated trade in conventional arms,
Bearing in mind that civilians, particularly women and children, account for the vast majority of those adversely affected by armed conflict and armed violence,
Recognizing also the challenges faced by victims of armed conflict and their need for adequate care, rehabilitation and social and economic inclusion,
Emphasizing that nothing in this Treaty prevents States from maintaining and adopting additional effective measures to further the object and purpose of this Treaty,
Mindful of the legitimate trade and lawful ownership, and use of certain conventional arms for recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities, where such trade, ownership and use are permitted or protected by law,
Mindful also of the role regional organizations can play in assisting States Parties, upon request, in implementing this Treaty,
Recognizing the voluntary and active role that civil society, including nongovernmental organizations, and industry, can play in raising awareness of the object and purpose of this Treaty, and in supporting its implementation,
Acknowledging that regulation of the international trade in conventional arms and preventing their diversion should not hamper international cooperation and legitimate trade in materiel, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes,
Emphasizing the desirability of achieving universal adherence to this Treaty,
Determined to act in accordance with the following principles;
– The inherent right of all States to individual or collective self-defence as recognized in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations;
– The settlement of international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered in accordance with Article 2 (3) of the Charter of the United Nations;
– Refraining in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations in accordance with Article 2 (4) of the Charter of the United Nations;
– Non-intervention in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State in accordance with Article 2 (7) of the Charter of the United Nations;
– Respecting and ensuring respect for international humanitarian law in accordance with, inter alia, the Geneva Conventions of 1949, and respecting and ensuring respect for human rights in accordance with, inter alia, the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
– The responsibility of all States, in accordance with their respective international obligations, to effectively regulate the international trade in conventional arms, and to prevent their diversion, as well as the primary responsibility of all States in establishing and implementing their respective national control systems;
– The respect for the legitimate interests of States to acquire conventional arms to exercise their right to self-defence and for peacekeeping operations; and to produce, export, import and transfer conventional arms;
– Implementing this Treaty in a consistent, objective and non-discriminatory manner,
Have agreed as follows:
Object and Purpose
The object of this Treaty is to:
– Establish the highest possible common international standards for regulating or improving the regulation of the international trade in conventional arms;
– Prevent and eradicate the illicit trade in conventional arms and prevent their diversion; for the purpose of:
– Contributing to international and regional peace, security and stability;
– Reducing human suffering;
– Promoting cooperation, transparency and responsible action by States Parties in the international trade in conventional arms, thereby building confidence among States Parties.
1. This Treaty shall apply to all conventional arms within the following categories:
(a) Battle tanks;
(b) Armoured combat vehicles;
(c) Large-calibre artillery systems;
(d) Combat aircraft;
(e) Attack helicopters;
(g) Missiles and missile launchers; and
(h) Small arms and light weapons.
2. For the purposes of this Treaty, the activities of the international trade comprise export, import, transit, trans-shipment and brokering, hereafter referred to as “transfer”.
3. This Treaty shall not apply to the international movement of conventional arms by, or on behalf of, a State Party for its use provided that the conventional arms remain under that State Party’s ownership.
Each State Party shall establish and maintain a national control system to regulate the export of ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1), and shall apply the provisions of Article 6 and Article 7 prior to authorizing the export of such ammunition/munitions.
Parts and Components
Each State Party shall establish and maintain a national control system to regulate the export of parts and components where the export is in a form that provides the capability to assemble the conventional arms covered under Article 2
(1) and shall apply the provisions of Article 6 and Article 7 prior to authorizing the export of such parts and components.
1. Each State Party shall implement this Treaty in a consistent, objective and non-discriminatory manner, bearing in mind the principles referred to in this Treaty.
2. Each State Party shall establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list, in order to implement the provisions of this Treaty.
3. Each State Party is encouraged to apply the provisions of this Treaty to the broadest range of conventional arms. National definitions of any of the categories covered under Article 2 (1) (a)-(g) shall not cover less than the descriptions used in the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms at the time of entry into force of this Treaty. For the category covered under Article 2 (1) (h), national definitions shall not cover less than the descriptions used in relevant United Nations instruments at the time of entry into force of this Treaty.
4. Each State Party, pursuant to its national laws, shall provide its national control list to the Secretariat, which shall make it available to other States Parties. States Parties are encouraged to make their control lists publicly available.
5. Each State Party shall take measures necessary to implement the provisions of this Treaty and shall designate competent national authorities in order to have an effective and transparent national control system regulating the transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) and of items covered under Article 3 and Article 4.
6. Each State Party shall designate one or more national points of contact to exchange information on matters related to the implementation of this Treaty. Each State Party shall notify the Secretariat, established under Article 18, of its national point(s) of contact and keep the information updated.
1. A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) or of items covered under Article 3 or Article 4, if the transfer would violate its obligations under measures adopted by the United Nations Security Council acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular arms embargoes.
2. A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) or of items covered under Article 3 or Article 4, if the transfer would violate its relevant international obligations under international agreements to which it is a Party, in particular those relating to the transfer of, or illicit trafficking in, conventional arms.
3. A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) or of items covered under Article 3 or Article 4, if it has knowledge at the time of authorization that the arms or items would be used in the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, attacks directed against civilian objects or civilians protected as such, or other war crimes as defined by international agreements to which it is a Party.
Export and Export Assessment
1. If the export is not prohibited under Article 6, each exporting State Party, prior to authorization of the export of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) or of items covered under Article 3 or Article 4, under its jurisdiction and pursuant to its national control system, shall, in an objective and non-discriminatory manner, taking into account relevant factors, including information provided by the importing State in accordance with Article 8 (1), assess the potential that the conventional arms or items:
(a) would contribute to or undermine peace and security;
(b) could be used to:
(i) commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law;
(ii) commit or facilitate a serious violation of international human rights law;
(iii) commit or facilitate an act constituting an offence under international conventions or protocols relating to terrorism to which the exporting State is a Party; or
(iv) commit or facilitate an act constituting an offence under international conventions or protocols relating to transnational organized crime to which the exporting State is a Party.
2. The exporting State Party shall also consider whether there are measures that could be undertaken to mitigate risks identified in (a) or (b) in paragraph 1, such as confidence-building measures or jointly developed and agreed programmes by the exporting and importing States.
3. If, after conducting this assessment and considering available mitigating measures, the exporting State Party determines that there is an overriding risk of any of the negative consequences in paragraph 1, the exporting State Party shall not authorize the export.
4. The exporting State Party, in making this assessment, shall take into account the risk of the conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) or of the items covered under Article 3 or Article 4 being used to commit or facilitate serious acts of gender based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children.
5. Each exporting State Party shall take measures to ensure that all authorizations for the export of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) or of items covered under Article 3 or Article 4 are detailed and issued prior to the export.
6. Each exporting State Party shall make available appropriate information about the authorization in question, upon request, to the importing State Party and to the transit or trans-shipment States Parties, subject to its national laws, practices or policies.
7. If, after an authorization has been granted, an exporting State Party becomes aware of new relevant information, it is encouraged to reassess the authorization after consultations, if appropriate, with the importing State.
1. Each importing State Party shall take measures to ensure that appropriate and relevant information is provided, upon request, pursuant to its national laws, to the exporting State Party, to assist the exporting State Party in conducting its national export assessment under Article 7. Such measures may include end use or end user documentation.
2. Each importing State Party shall take measures that will allow it to regulate, where necessary, imports under its jurisdiction of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1). Such measures may include import systems.
3. Each importing State Party may request information from the exporting State Party concerning any pending or actual export authorizations where the importing State Party is the country of final destination.
Transit or trans-shipment
Each State Party shall take appropriate measures to regulate, where necessary and feasible, the transit or trans-shipment under its jurisdiction of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) through its territory in accordance with relevant international law.
Each State Party shall take measures, pursuant to its national laws, to regulate brokering taking place under its jurisdiction for conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1). Such measures may include requiring brokers to register or obtain written authorization before engaging in brokering.
1. Each State Party involved in the transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) shall take measures to prevent their diversion.
2. The exporting State Party shall seek to prevent the diversion of the transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) through its national control system, established in accordance with Article 5 (2), by assessing the risk of diversion of the export and considering the establishment of mitigation measures such as confidence-building measures or jointly developed and agreed programmes by the exporting and importing States. Other prevention measures may include, where appropriate: examining parties involved in the export, requiring additional documentation, certificates, assurances, not authorizing the export or other appropriate measures.
3. Importing, transit, trans-shipment and exporting States Parties shall cooperate and exchange information, pursuant to their national laws, where appropriate and feasible, in order to mitigate the risk of diversion of the transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1).
4. If a State Party detects a diversion of transferred conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1), the State Party shall take appropriate measures, pursuant to its national laws and in accordance with international law, to address such diversion. Such measures may include alerting potentially affected States Parties, examining diverted shipments of such conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1), and taking follow-up measures through investigation and law enforcement.
5. In order to better comprehend and prevent the diversion of transferred conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1), States Parties are encouraged to share relevant information with one another on effective measures to address diversion. Such information may include information on illicit activities including corruption, international trafficking routes, illicit brokers, sources of illicit supply, methods of concealment, common points of dispatch, or destinations used by organized groups engaged in diversion.
6. States Parties are encouraged to report to other States Parties, through the Secretariat, on measures taken in addressing the diversion of transferred conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1).
1. Each State Party shall maintain national records, pursuant to its national laws and regulations, of its issuance of export authorizations or its actual exports of the conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1).
2. Each State Party is encouraged to maintain records of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) that are transferred to its territory as the final destination or that are authorized to transit or trans-ship territory under its jurisdiction.
3. Each State Party is encouraged to include in those records: the quantity, value, model/type, authorized international transfers of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1), conventional arms actually transferred, details of exporting State(s), importing State(s), transit and trans-shipment State(s), and end users, as appropriate.
4. Records shall be kept for a minimum of ten years.
1. Each State Party shall, within the first year after entry into force of this Treaty for that State Party, in accordance with Article 22, provide an initial report to the Secretariat of measures undertaken in order to implement this Treaty, including national laws, national control lists and other regulations and administrative measures. Each State Party shall report to the Secretariat on any new measures undertaken in order to implement this Treaty, when appropriate. Reports shall be made available, and distributed to States Parties by the Secretariat.
2. States Parties are encouraged to report to other States Parties, through the Secretariat, information on measures taken that have been proven effective in addressing the diversion of transferred conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1).
3. Each State Party shall submit annually to the Secretariat by 31 May a report for the preceding calendar year concerning authorized or actual exports and imports of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1). Reports shall be made available, and distributed to States Parties by the Secretariat. The report submitted to the Secretariat may contain the same information submitted by the State Party to relevant United Nations frameworks, including the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms. Reports may exclude commercially sensitive or national security information.
Each State Party shall take appropriate measures to enforce national laws and regulations that implement the provisions of this Treaty.
1. States Parties shall cooperate with each other, consistent with their respective security interests and national laws, to effectively implement this Treaty.
2. States Parties are encouraged to facilitate international cooperation, including exchanging information on matters of mutual interest regarding the implementation and application of this Treaty pursuant to their respective security interests and national laws.
3. States Parties are encouraged to consult on matters of mutual interest and to share information, as appropriate, to support the implementation of this Treaty.
4. States Parties are encouraged to cooperate, pursuant to their national laws, in order to assist national implementation of the provisions of this Treaty, including through sharing information regarding illicit activities and actors and in order to prevent and eradicate diversion of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1).
5. States Parties shall, where jointly agreed and consistent with their national laws, afford one another the widest measure of assistance in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to violations of national measures established pursuant to this Treaty.
6. States Parties are encouraged to take national measures and to cooperate with each other to prevent the transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1) becoming subject to corrupt practices.
7. States Parties are encouraged to exchange experience and information on lessons learned in relation to any aspect of this Treaty.
1. In implementing this Treaty, each State Party may seek assistance including legal or legislative assistance, institutional capacity-building, and technical, material or financial assistance. Such assistance may include stockpile management, disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programmes, model legislation, and effective practices for implementation. Each State Party in a position to do so shall provide such assistance, upon request.
2. Each State Party may request, offer or receive assistance through, inter alia, the United Nations, international, regional, subregional or national organizations, non-governmental organizations, or on a bilateral basis.
3. A voluntary trust fund shall be established by States Parties to assist requesting States Parties requiring international assistance to implement this Treaty. Each State Party is encouraged to contribute resources to the fund.
Conference of States Parties
1. A Conference of States Parties shall be convened by the provisional Secretariat, established under Article 18, no later than one year following the entry into force of this Treaty and thereafter at such other times as may be decided by the Conference of States Parties.
2. The Conference of States Parties shall adopt by consensus its rules of procedure at its first session.
3. The Conference of States Parties shall adopt financial rules for itself as well as governing the funding of any subsidiary bodies it may establish as well as financial provisions governing the functioning of the Secretariat. At each ordinary session, it shall adopt a budget for the financial period until the next ordinary session.
4. The Conference of States Parties shall:
(a) Review the implementation of this Treaty, including developments in the field of conventional arms;
(b) Consider and adopt recommendations regarding the implementation and operation of this Treaty, in particular the promotion of its universality;
(c) Consider amendments to this Treaty in accordance with Article 20;
(d) Consider issues arising from the interpretation of this Treaty;
(e) Consider and decide the tasks and budget of the Secretariat;
(f) Consider the establishment of any subsidiary bodies as may be necessary to improve the functioning of this Treaty; and
(g) Perform any other function consistent with this Treaty.
5. Extraordinary meetings of the Conference of States Parties shall be held at such other times as may be deemed necessary by the Conference of States Parties, or at the written request of any State Party provided that this request is supported by at least two-thirds of the States Parties.
1. This Treaty hereby establishes a Secretariat to assist States Parties in the effective implementation of this Treaty. Pending the first meeting of the Conference of States Parties, a provisional Secretariat will be responsible for the administrative functions covered under this Treaty.
2. The Secretariat shall be adequately staffed. Staff shall have the necessary expertise to ensure that the Secretariat can effectively undertake the responsibilities described in paragraph 3.
3. The Secretariat shall be responsible to States Parties. Within a minimized structure, the Secretariat shall undertake the following responsibilities:
(a) Receive, make available and distribute the reports as mandated by this Treaty;
(b) Maintain and make available to States Parties the list of national points of contact;
(c) Facilitate the matching of offers of and requests for assistance for Treaty implementation and promote international cooperation as requested;
(d) Facilitate the work of the Conference of States Parties, including making arrangements and providing the necessary services for meetings under this Treaty; and
(e) Perform other duties as decided by the Conferences of States Parties.
1. States Parties shall consult and, by mutual consent, cooperate to pursue settlement of any dispute that may arise between them with regard to the interpretation or application of this Treaty including through negotiations, mediation, conciliation, judicial settlement or other peaceful means.
2. States Parties may pursue, by mutual consent, arbitration to settle any dispute between them, regarding issues concerning the interpretation or application of this Treaty.
1. Six years after the entry into force of this Treaty, any State Party may propose an amendment to this Treaty. Thereafter, proposed amendments may only be considered by the Conference of States Parties every three years.
2. Any proposal to amend this Treaty shall be submitted in writing to the Secretariat, which shall circulate the proposal to all States Parties, not less than 180 days before the next meeting of the Conference of States Parties at which amendments may be considered pursuant to paragraph 1. The amendment shall be considered at the next Conference of States Parties at which amendments may be considered pursuant to paragraph 1 if, no later than 120 days after its circulation by the Secretariat, a majority of States Parties notify the Secretariat that they support consideration of the proposal.
3. The States Parties shall make every effort to achieve consensus on each amendment. If all efforts at consensus have been exhausted, and no agreement reached, the amendment shall, as a last resort, be adopted by a three-quarters majority vote of the States Parties present and voting at the meeting of the Conference of States Parties. For the purposes of this Article, States Parties present and voting means States Parties present and casting an affirmative or negative vote. The Depositary shall communicate any adopted amendment to all States Parties.
4. An amendment adopted in accordance with paragraph 3 shall enter into force for each State Party that has deposited its instrument of acceptance for that amendment, ninety days following the date of deposit with the Depositary of the instruments of acceptance by a majority of the number of States Parties at the time of the adoption of the amendment. Thereafter, it shall enter into force for any remaining State Party ninety days following the date of deposit of its instrument of acceptance for that amendment.
Signature, Ratification, Acceptance, Approval or Accession
1. This Treaty shall be open for signature at the United Nations Headquarters in New York by all States from 3 June 2013 until its entry into force.
2. This Treaty is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval by each signatory State.
3. Following its entry into force, this Treaty shall be open for accession by any State that has not signed the Treaty.
4. The instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession shall be deposited with the Depositary.
Entry into Force
1. This Treaty shall enter into force ninety days following the date of the deposit of the fiftieth instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval with the Depositary.
2. For any State that deposits its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession subsequent to the entry into force of this Treaty, this Treaty shall enter into force for that State ninety days following the date of deposit of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.
Any State may at the time of signature or the deposit of instrument of its of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, declare that it will apply provisionally Article 6 and Article 7 pending the entry into force of this Treaty for that State.
Duration and Withdrawal
1. This Treaty shall be of unlimited duration.
2. Each State Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Treaty. It shall give notification of such withdrawal to the Depositary, which shall notify all other States Parties. The notification of withdrawal may include an explanation of the reasons for its withdrawal. The notice of withdrawal shall take effect ninety days after the receipt of the notification of withdrawal by the Depositary, unless the notification of withdrawal specifies a later date.
3. A State shall not be discharged, by reason of its withdrawal, from the obligations arising from this Treaty while it was a Party to this Treaty, including any financial obligations that it may have accrued.
1. At the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, each State may formulate reservations, unless the reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of this Treaty.
2. A State Party may withdraw its reservation at any time by notification to this effect addressed to the Depositary.
Relationship with other international agreements
1. The implementation of this Treaty shall not prejudice obligations undertaken by States Parties with regard to existing or future international agreements, to which they are parties, where those obligations are consistent with this Treaty.
2. This Treaty shall not be cited as grounds for voiding defence cooperation agreements concluded between States Parties to this Treaty.
The Secretary-General of the United Nations shall be the Depositary of this Treaty.
The original text of this Treaty, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
DONE AT NEW YORK, this twenty-eighth day of March, two thousand and thirteen.
I listened to the radio a lot in my long commute to work every morning. Sometimes, I chose a music station, sometimes talk radio. On September 11th, 2001 it didn’t matter.
I made it to work in Murray, Utah but sat in the car for a while, waiting for a break in the coverage so that I could have time to login to my computer and stream the news once I got to my desk. AM/FM radios didn’t work well in our office space. At the time I still hadn’t figured out what had happened, only that a tragic airliner accident had occurred in New York and that it was probably a terrorist attack.
I read later that Walmart did record sales on 9-11 on rabbit-ear antennae, because folks working in office buildings across the country wanted to access coverage on their training video setups in conference rooms. We were one of those offices. I arrived upstairs to find everyone gathered around the TV, like in that newsroom on the movie Independence Day. It was then that I watched the second jetliner hit the second World Trade Center tower and knew of a surety that this was no accident…that people had done it on purpose to kill other people.
That’s when the shock and the horror turned into anger and tears.
Very little work got done at my workplace, mostly discussion and research into the available facts surrounding the event. I don’t think I have any friends or relatives directly linked to the relatives of the victims, and my politics are far removed from those of the people of New York by and large. But I love people and hate to see anyone hurt. I love my country, for all of its flaws, and I grieved deeply for the loss of those brothers and sisters and their families who I would never meet.
I read about people hanging flags from overpasses, and saw one on my commute home. I knew of an overpass where a remote country road crossed the freeway in Peterson, a town near the house in Morgan where I lived. I took the cheap flag that we set out on holidays out of the closet and went there. I stood over each oncoming lane of traffic in turn and waved it in the wind, high over my head, as the horns of the vehicles passing underneath me on I-84 sounded in reply, until I couldn’t lift the flag anymore. I waved the flag for them, they honked for me, and together we mourned.
Middle-east terrorism became personal that day, for myself and most of the people of my country. The nation was even one for a while, before everyone started pointing fingers. Before January of the next year all of the old rivalries and disagreements had returned, but all of us still share the legacy of the event in our hearts. A terrible tragedy, intended to destroy a culture, now binds us together on at least one issue. Before 9-11 I watched a documentary advising people to acquiesce if they are ever taken hostage by terrorists. After those towers, and the Pentagon, and that plane lying in a field, I think it firmed everyone’s resolve in such a way that nothing like that will ever be tolerated again by travelers in this country. All civilized people still have an animal, with its instinct for self-preservation and species protection, sleeping inside them. There exists a hidden courage in the hearts of all men and women that ignites whenever they can clearly see and end result that they know they won’t like. Experts tell us now to introduce ourselves to those sitting next to us on flights, to put our fellow passenger at ease so that they have nothing to fear from us. Now I always do that, and even though I usually travel alone, now I always travel with a new friend.
Frustrated at the antiseptic approach that the media took in its war coverage, I wrote Another Man’s Terrorist. When I couldn’t get it published in Jim Baen‘s Universe, Roy Dudgeon invited me to include it in his upcoming anthology Satirica. The story wasn’t a perfect fit for that book, and exceeded the size requirements, but Roy let me publish it there anyway. I started this blog to promote Another Man’s Terrorist, so that my earliest posts talk of it, terrorism, child soldiers, etc. The same publisher that took Satirica for Roy also took my book, Into the Dark: Escape of the Nomad.
The land in which I live has been a land of peace for every day of my life except for September 11th, 2001. Yet, that day changed me like non other. Nothing will ever bring me back to the person I was before the towers fell. It is my second birthday. Into the Dark isn’t written on that theme of course, I moved on, as did this blog, but I can never forget that event. It has indelibly stitched itself into my history, my published works, my very soul.
So that is what 80,000 people look like.
The largest first Comic Con on record.
Maybe the third largest ever.
Salt Lake City’s first Comic Con is walking off into memory. I know I’ll never forget it. This is what I thought Worldcon would be like the first time I went to one, in Reno. After Reno I set my expectations down a bit on numbers of people, crazy costumes, and dramatic displays.
To my left in this photo is my daughter Alicia. To my right is my kid sister Cristina. I seem to have been the best Abraham Lincoln (I only saw one other, and he didn’t have the skilled makeup artist that I did). Several folks told me that mine was the best costume, but I do not agree. I looked good (the lighting in this shot doesn’t do me justice), but there were so many excellent versions of so many film and gaming characters that I doubt anyone could name a definitive ‘best’.
Alicia came the last day as Aurra Sing from Star Wars, and in doing so she may have scarred her new Dr. Who cosplay friends from the previous two days for life. She said hello, they recognised her voice and looked up, their eyes went wide, and then they ran stumbling away. It was phenomenal! Her and her husband were photographed, both together and separately, hundreds of times.
I had already nearly lost my voice from the first day, so spending some time just walking around having my picture taken a couple dozen times was somewhat restful. Each time I sent them off to our booth to talk to Tom about The Pinkertons and our kick starters.
Great fun was had by all and I’m glad I went. I’m equally happy to be home from it.
That was a crazy day.
I tried, and failed, to repair my car yesterday morning. So we ended up just leaving it and heading to the con.
Roger and I met lots of great folks and sold more books.
Alicia got a film makeup job that’s shooting in a couple of weeks. Her resume is an ugly gash that she installed on my sister’s face.
We expect all 60,000 people who signed up to attend will be out walking around. Yesterday, it was already difficult to get around. My son in law had an even more difficult time in his superb Boba Fett costume because people kept stopping him for photos. Little kids yelling, “Boba Fett! Boba Fett! It was like he was Santa Claus or something.
Today, she will transform me in Abe Lincoln.
Come and see.
Booth setup issues.
Trips to WALMART to resolve them.
My friend Michael Tanner calls Soft Open because it doesn’t start until around mid-afternoon
One thing that I liked was the The Hobbit display.
These were life-sized. Azog really is rather large.
My daughter Alicia demonstrated her makeup skills, inflicting injuries on several passersby. I told them they should go to the The Hobbit display and take some pictures that look like Azog the Defiler got them. I just noticed that this photo is blurry though. I’ll have to get one from new victim tomorrow.
I sold some books, as did Roger White who partnered with us on our booth, and Tom Carr sold a kickstarter donation for The Pinkertons.
That was all with a light crowd…though one can’t really call a Comic Con crowd light, even on a Thursday. I was told that 66,000 people purchased tickets for the event as of sometime Thursday morning. Even any kind of weekday subset of that is still huge.
On the way to Alicia’s house to spend the night, my car died so I didn’t get to bed until around 1:30.
Tomorrow will be a longer day, with less asleep. It’ll be fun! That’s what conventions are all about right?
See that fellow in the tall hat? Look familiar?
My media industry friend, Tom Carr (the fellow in the bowler hat), with his interest in U.S. History, decided to produce a series of historical fiction short films about the Pinkerton Detective Agency. When he asked around for someone to play President Abraham Lincoln, one of my favorite people in history, I jumped at the chance.
I have a little acting experience, and Lincoln is an example of leadership that I have always tried to follow with interest.
Allen Pinkerton served as Lincoln’s body guard through the troubled and dangerous times of the U.S. Civil War and his agency became the mold from which the Secret Service was formed.
We are filming the first episode, A Secret Mission, this summer, entirely funded by Tom. He has chosen several talented actors to partner with in this effort. My highly skilled daughter, Alicia, does my makeup.
Would you like to be a part of it too? Well, we have put together a way for you to do that through a type on kickstarter system. You can help us put together episodes 1 and 2 and get some cool stuff back for your help.
I will be attending Comicon, at booth number 101, and ready to tell about it. I might even have Alicia transform me into Lincoln. If you don’t yet have a copy of Into the Dark I’ll have those there too.
If you don’t show up to see me, then show up to see Richard Hatch, dirk Benedict, William Shatner or one of the other attending stars that’ll be signing stuff.
Gazillions of people will be there! It’ll be a zoo!
I’ll look for you there.
Yes…I’ve been hiding. When strugglings writers stop self promotion, they effectively fade into the background noise like an alligator sinking into the swamp.
I even went to Worldcon without telling anyone. I didn’t talk about it here, or on Facebook or Twitter. I didn’t participate on any panels either. I arrived two days late, conducted a little business, sat on the Enterprise bridge, attended the Hugo’s, and went home.
Well, I have a project that I’m working on that in combination with my other personal challenges on my time has kept all of my free time booked up. Some of you already know a little about this project. I wrote a little for it, but mostly it develops a different talent that I struggle with.
I’ll tell you all about it tomorrow, and where/when you can see some of it.
If you already know, don’t spoil it. If you don’t already know then trust me, you’ll never guess.
I realize that there is no easy road in Syria. However, the United States Constitution makes the President the Commander in Chief of the military, not Congress…for good reason. Because war by committee is a recipe for disaster. If he thinks that talk is the solution, then he might as well just take the military option back off of the table.
Or just let the U.N. handle it. Their good at talk.
By his own admission, the President has established that what is being considered is a limited military action, not a declaration of war. That should not involve Congress.
He should decide what he is going to do and then do it and Congress should shut up.
All this talk, debate and disclosure does is reveal intelligence ways and means and limit the effectiveness of whatever action he does do, military or otherwise.
Sign me up! Please!
I herby throw my name (and this blog address with it) into the hat for consideration to name a hurricane.
As part of my submission, I provide this link to my blog article poking fun at both extreme ends of the global warming issue as evidence of my rebellion.
Now granted, the issue has evolved somewhat since my whining three years ago, and many of the more closed-minded proponents and detractors seem to have found more common ground and left the lunatic fringe.
However, I’m hope that there are still enough kooks out there that I can annoy enough to get a majority vote for a storm name. My name starts with a “B” so I’d even get an early season storm! I even already have a Twitter feed @bhousley that I’ll use for talking like a storm.
@bhousley: I don’t know why you folks down there are complaining, the #weather up here is beautiful!
@bhousley: I’m gonna getcha! I’m gonna getcha!
@bhousley: AGGGHHH!!!! There’s a #hurricane hunter aircraft in my eye!
No I’m not making light of the damage done by these terrible and dangerous storms. I dislike hurricanes, as anyone who reads this blog regularly knows. I am making fun of closed-minded people, of which I also can sometimes be. So I’m ridiculing myself as much as anyone…
…and looking for some free publicity. ;-)
I wrote about this flag modification back in 2009, and spoke strong words against it at the time. I doubted that this could really happen though. I also implied that it was so ridiculous that it could just as easily be some sarcastic Conservative making fun of the President or trying to frighten folks.
I was mistaken. This flag is real. Folks sell copies of it and other folks who are enthusiastic about President Obama are flying and waving it. I consider doing so to be tanamount to treason.
Now it would be a huge mistake to assign blame to Democrats or Liberals in general, or to President Obama, for this desicration. I do not beleive that any person, the President included, who understands what this country stands for would condone the placement of any individual’s image on the flag in this way.
We should all support the President, whether we criticize his policies or not. We are one nation under God and should act that way. I don’t think that this flag supports the President…I think it denigrades him and the office of the Presidency. He is not a dictator, but this flag makes him look like one and sends the wrong message to the world. Flying this flag does President Obama no favors and does nothing to support his policies. It gives up important political high-ground to his critics which makes it harder for him to do his job. Like him or not, a dishonored President does harm to our country and this flag dishonors him. Displaying this flag uses the President’s face in an illegal, unpatriotic and very scary way that groups him with murderers and tyrants like Fidel Castro and Mao Zedong which I (one of his critics) think is disgusting.
All responsible citizens of the U.S., regardless of their political alignment, should deplore this misuse of the flag and the Presidential office in the strongest terms.
I call on people all over the U.S. to rise up and condemn this. I call on the President to publicly repudiate it.
This 16 year old teen went missing from American Fork, Utah, since the morning of August 2nd (if I have understood the timing of the original post correctly).
My guess, considering the source and the circumstances, is that she is not a runaway. Maybe she is still somewhere local, maybe she is traveling. Either way I feel very strongly about child exploitation and would consider it a personal favor if everyone within reach of this blog kept a eye out for her within the possible radius from the time she went missing.
Update: Kelsey was found 30 hours after she went missing. I don’t know any details.
Any released information can be found here:
In the name of God, the most beneficent, the most merciful.
Honorable UN Secretary General Mr Ban Ki-moon, respected president of the General Assembly Vuk Jeremic, honorable UN envoy for global education Mr Gordon Brown, respected elders and my dear brothers and sisters: Assalamu alaikum.
Today is it an honor for me to be speaking again after a long time. Being here with such honorable people is a great moment in my life and it is an honor for me that today I am wearing a shawl of the late Benazir Bhutto. I don’t know where to begin my speech. I don’t know what people would be expecting me to say, but first of all thank you to God for whom we all are equal and thank you to every person who has prayed for my fast recovery and new life. I cannot believe how much love people have shown me. I have received thousands of good wish cards and gifts from all over the world. Thank you to all of them. Thank you to the children whose innocent words encouraged me. Thank you to my elders whose prayers strengthened me. I would like to thank my nurses, doctors and the staff of the hospitals in Pakistan and the UK and the UAE government who have helped me to get better and recover my strength.
I fully support UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in his Global Education First Initiative and the work of UN Special Envoy for Global Education Gordon Brown and the respectful president of the UN General Assembly Vuk Jeremic. I thank them for the leadership they continue to give. They continue to inspire all of us to action. Dear brothers and sisters, do remember one thing: Malala Day is not my day. Today is the day of every woman, every boy and every girl who have raised their voice for their rights.
There are hundreds of human rights activists and social workers who are not only speaking for their rights, but who are struggling to achieve their goal of peace, education and equality. Thousands of people have been killed by the terrorists and millions have been injured. I am just one of them. So here I stand. So here I stand, one girl, among many. I speak not for myself, but so those without a voice can be heard. Those who have fought for their rights. Their right to live in peace. Their right to be treated with dignity. Their right to equality of opportunity. Their right to be educated.
Dear friends, on 9 October 2012, the Taliban shot me on the left side of my forehead. They shot my friends, too. They thought that the bullets would silence us, but they failed. And out of that silence came thousands of voices. The terrorists thought they would change my aims and stop my ambitions. But nothing changed in my life except this: weakness, fear and hopelessness died. Strength, power and courage was born.
I am the same Malala. My ambitions are the same. My hopes are the same. And my dreams are the same. Dear sisters and brothers, I am not against anyone. Neither am I here to speak in terms of personal revenge against the Taliban or any other terrorist group. I am here to speak for the right of education for every child. I want education for the sons and daughters of the Taliban and all the terrorists and extremists. I do not even hate the Talib who shot me. Even if there was a gun in my hand and he was standing in front of me, I would not shoot him. This is the compassion I have learned from Mohammed, the prophet of mercy, Jesus Christ and Lord Buddha. This the legacy of change I have inherited from Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela and Mohammed Ali Jinnah.
This is the philosophy of nonviolence that I have learned from Gandhi, Bacha Khan and Mother Teresa. And this is the forgiveness that I have learned from my father and from my mother. This is what my soul is telling me: be peaceful and love everyone.
Dear sisters and brothers, we realize the importance of light when we see darkness. We realize the importance of our voice when we are silenced. In the same way, when we were in Swat, the north of Pakistan, we realized the importance of pens and books when we saw the guns. The wise saying, “The pen is mightier than the sword.” It is true. The extremists are afraid of books and pens. The power of education frightens them. They are afraid of women. The power of the voice of women frightens them. This is why they killed 14 innocent students in the recent attack in Quetta. And that is why they kill female teachers. That is why they are blasting schools every day because they were and they are afraid of change and equality that we will bring to our society. And I remember that there was a boy in our school who was asked by a journalist why are the Taliban against education? He answered very simply by pointing to his book, he said, “a Talib doesn’t know what is written inside this book.”
They think that God is a tiny, little conservative being who would point guns at people’s heads just for going to school. These terrorists are misusing the name of Islam for their own personal benefit. Pakistan is a peace loving, democratic country. Pashtuns want education for their daughters and sons. Islam is a religion of peace, humanity and brotherhood. It is the duty and responsibility to get education for each child, that is what it says. Peace is a necessity for education. In many parts of the world, especially Pakistan and Afghanistan, terrorism, war and conflicts stop children from going to schools. We are really tired of these wars. Women and children are suffering in many ways in many parts of the world.
In India, innocent and poor children are victims of child labor. Many schools have been destroyed in Nigeria. People in Afghanistan have been affected by extremism. Young girls have to do domestic child labor and are forced to get married at an early age. Poverty, ignorance, injustice, racism and the deprivation of basic rights are the main problems, faced by both men and women.
Today I am focusing on women’s rights and girls’ education because they are suffering the most. There was a time when women activists asked men to stand up for their rights. But this time we will do it by ourselves. I am not telling men to step away from speaking for women’s rights, but I am focusing on women to be independent and fight for themselves. So dear sisters and brothers, now it’s time to speak up. So today, we call upon the world leaders to change their strategic policies in favor of peace and prosperity. We call upon the world leaders that all of these deals must protect women and children’s rights. A deal that goes against the rights of women is unacceptable.
We call upon all governments to ensure free, compulsory education all over the world for every child. We call upon all the governments to fight against terrorism and violence. To protect children from brutality and harm. We call upon the developed nations to support the expansion of education opportunities for girls in the developing world. We call upon all communities to be tolerant, to reject prejudice based on caste, creed, sect, color, religion or agenda to ensure freedom and equality for women so they can flourish. We cannot all succeed when half of us are held back. We call upon our sisters around the world to be brave, to embrace the strength within themselves and realize their full potential.
Dear brothers and sisters, we want schools and education for every child’s bright future. We will continue our journey to our destination of peace and education. No one can stop us. We will speak up for our rights and we will bring change to our voice. We believe in the power and the strength of our words. Our words can change the whole world because we ware all together, united for the cause of education. And if we want to achieve our goal, then let us empower ourselves with the weapon of knowledge and let us shield ourselves with unity and togetherness.
Dear brothers and sisters, we must not forget that millions of people are suffering from poverty and injustice and ignorance. We must not forget that millions of children are out of their schools. We must not forget that our sisters and brothers are waiting for a bright, peaceful future.
So let us wage, so let us wage a glorious struggle against illiteracy, poverty and terrorism, let us pick up our books and our pens, they are the most powerful weapons. One child, one teacher, one book and one pen can change the world. Education is the only solution. Education first. Thank you.
The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog.
Here’s an excerpt:
600 people reached the top of Mt. Everest in 2012. This blog got about 5,900 views in 2012. If every person who reached the top of Mt. Everest viewed this blog, it would have taken 10 years to get that many views.
Imagine the mess it would have made if it had made it to the ground…not a global catastrophe by any stretch, but the town of Chelyabinsk could have had far more serious casualties.
Of course, I’m talking about the Chelyabinsk Event yesterday when a meteor exploded 20 miles up, broke windows, and dropped fragments around. Weird how it had nothing to do with the 2012 DA14 asteroid flyby on the same day, which makes it just downright creepy. If they’d said that it was a fragment of the one that missed, on the same trajectory, well then that’s understandable. But, for the planet to get whacked by a once in 100 year asteroid, near a populated area, on the same day as a similarly rare close flyby from whole another direction…makes you feel like the 8 ball in a game of cosmic billiards.
Could the little one have been detected? No one has technology refined enough to see things that small. No one even saw 2012 DA14, which is much bigger, until…well…2012. They’re not even trying to detect rocks the size of the Chelyabinsk meteor. Those aren’t considered large enough to be a serious hazard. I know that a small town in Russia feels the hazard, but what are the odds? Most of the planet is covered by water and thus completely uninhabited by people and something like this might have not even been seen by anyone.
Will it happen again? Probably, but don’t hold your breath. But even 2012 DA14 is far too small to have been a world changing event even if it had hit us. By the way, don’t think that it’s safer if something as big as DA14 hit an ocean somewhere. Tsunamis could spread the effects of the impact around, unless it exploded in the air like in Chelyabinsk or the 1908 Tunkuska Event, a meteor about the size of 2012 DA14 that exploded over Siberia and leveled about 800 square miles.
Someone on Twitter was claimed to have heard of a found a fresh impact crater near the event with a baby inside wrapped in a blue cape with big yellow “S” on it. Hmm…. ;-)
As it turns out, they’ve added me to a couple of other panels at LTUE…both on Saturday.
3:00 pm Reading–Into the Dark:Escape of the Nomad (and short story requests if you like).
Someone on that list for social media panel might not be there (hence why they added me after the schedule posted). I’ll no doubt get to talk about this blog and how I connect it to Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. It was a similar panel like this one where I learned how to use Twitter properly. Very useful.
It’s great that they gave me space on the schedule for a reading. Come on out and we’ll shake hands.
It was 40 years ago yesterday, on the 7th of December, 1972, the mighty Saturn 5 rocket lifted off. It carried the Apollo 17 moon mission, astronauts who would be the last humans on the moon in what has now been four decades.
The Apollo effort came together as a competition between two scared super rivals, the United States and the Soviet Union. That was the cause of the public’s involvement, but behind the scenes were folks excited about space and the moon and rockets and all that. Human kind, as a matter of public policy, reached out and touched another planet…and then just stopped. Why?
Now NASA works to build a huge rocket to go…where? To Mars, to an Asteroid, to L2…maybe. What about the moon? On this the 40th year after the last manned moon launch (“last” as in the most recent one) let us ask ourselves, “Why go back?”
1> Because it is an easier target for testing the equipment for a flight to Mars.
Yes, we went to the Moon already, but the equipment that we built to do that is long since dust. We’ve learned some things since then and need new equipment based on that knowledge. That new equipment needs a shake-down cruise to an easy target. The Moon is, from the perspective of Earth orbit, pretty much a fixed target in space. It is always in the same place and we can come and go on our own schedule. Mars and other “deep space” destination are orbiting the Sun just like we are, and at different rates of speed than the Earth. This makes launching to any of them a one-shot deal. If you have a launch failure, you might have to wait another year or more until the Earth and that object swing near to each other again.
If going to Low Earth Orbit is like stepping out onto your back porch, and going to the Moon is like driving down the street to the local supermarket, then going to Mars is like catching a train without it stopping…like an old West train robbery, riding up to the moving train on fast horses and jumping on. So in the same sense that the ISS is a nice test bed for long-duration space survival, the Moon is a nice test bed for long-distance space travel.
2> Because we still have more to learn from the Moon.
Been there done that? Well ya, 40 years ago! One person might say that we’ve learned all there is to learn from the Moon, but someone ELSE might say instead that we’ve learned all there is to learn from the science that we brought back from the Moon…and so now we need more. They’ve taken new looks at old data, using computers that are only available now, and found new things there to look at that no one was looking for before. Armed with today’s data-gathering abilities, we have the ability to answer questions that we could not even ask back then. Plus, Apollo was a fast-moving effort, a hammer looking for a nail. We’ve had 40 years to think of new questions now.
3> Because it’s cool.
It is! So I had to list it here. I know that this reasoning doesn’t effect everyone, but oh well.
4> Because we never stayed the first time.
Forty years ago we only wanted to show the world that we could get there and back, and it was only barely possible. Some say that we should have set up a Moon base back then, but the ability to live for long periods of time in space did not exist. On Apollo 17 two men lived on the Moon for three days, the unchallenged record! We have now operated the ISS for more than 10 years so we know how to STAY on the Moon. Things that had to be fit into a schedule and then left behind can now be looked at from the perspective of routine, long-term effort. It is like the difference between science done on the Space Shuttle verses science done on the ISS. It is time for a Moon station at the very least, if not a colony. Ask yourself, what kinds of exploration and science could we do if we built an ISS on the Moon? Call it the International Moon Station.
4> One word…China.
Yep, we are back in competition, we just don’t know it yet. China has started working up to their own Apollo. All of the reasons for beating the Russians to the Moon are back in play. An International Moon base will be the property of the people of Earth, but a Chinese Moon Base would be the property of China.
By the way, it looks like North Korea is getting ready to try again at launching a satellite. Their attempt in April failed and blew up over the sea. Did you know that their launch path is on a polar orbit? There is a wake up call waiting in there for someone maybe.
It’s not the Moon destination but the road that you travel to get there that provides the real value. We learned much on the way to Apollo, during Apollo, and after. Since then we have stretched the envelope in other ways, but not distance. The journey of a hundred miles starts with a first step, but there are many other steps, and rest stops, food, shoes, terrain. We can do it better now, and faster, and there are new things waiting to be learned when we mix our new abilities with another long trek to our newest neighbor.
The first Moon program changed out world culture. There are more changes waiting to be made.
Now where do we go from here? Will Apollo 17 be the last Moon shot for fifty years before we (humanity) return to the Moon?
Those of you who know me well know that I like Christmas…a lot.
So when I discovered YouTube playlists last year, I started work on one for my Christmas Favorites.
Well today that list hit Fifty videos. That’s right, Fifty vids of Christmas songs playing straight through. Some of the video mixes are professionally mixed music videos, some are simple slide shows made by folks like you and me (with the proverbial mold marks still intact). I love them all.
Also, this year I started a more selective subset playlist of only Christmas tunes that use a picturesque slide show of some kind as a back drop. The purpose in mind was to run it on a computer or computer attached TV as a screensaver during parties, tree decorating, family meals or on Christmas morning. Some of them have box ads but I leave out shows that have a preceding ad video so that the run from song to song will be unbroken and so that we can trust the content. At this writing there are seventeen videos on this list, but it is growing fast. If you hit the random button it might run for hours before the repetition gets boring. I’ll keep growing it too.
I sometimes forget when I’ve already included a song and add it again (and and again and again) so there might be duplicates in these lists, I’ll remove them as I discover them. Now, understand that I am the religious type, so a large proportion of these songs are religiously themed. Also, I like Country and Western music and you’ll see that in a lot of the artists on the list. If any of that is a problem for you, or if there are some songs on here that you get tired of, just use it as a template and start building your own lists.
BTW, the YouTube app for the Droid plays playlists, but might skip some of the videos because they are not licensed for mobile use. Beware of data-use overage charges though. Use WiFi if you can.
Join me in enjoying these tunes and eat up that bandwidth! If all of us run these playlists together, our Internet providers will have to invest in more back-end infrastructure to handle the load and make the rest of the year’s Internet speeds phenomenal! It’ll be the Christmas gift that keeps on giving! ;-)
This may well be one of the most significant Presidential elections in the history of this country, so far as the country’s concerned. A President leads in many things, but the healthcare system that was invoked by President Obama carries a sharp contrast between people who love it and people who hate it.
Romney hates it. Not all of it. Just the parts that he thinks gives the Federal Government too much power over our lives. Many of us conservatives think that some parts of Obamacare take us on a slippery slope toward Socialism that will destroy our nation.
If you agree with him…Vote!
If you love Obamacare and want to see it fully implemented…Vote! Many people think that it is needed to mend the problems in the healthcare industry. If you agree…vote!
If Obama is reelected, Obamacare will go fully into effect and will probably never be repealed. These kinds of Government programs tend to sink their roots into the political system so that they can never be turned back. If you like it, this is your last chance to keep it.
If you hate Obamacare and want to see it go away, go to the polls and elect Romney and I promise you at least some of Obamacare will end…at least the parts of it that you and I consider to be the most dangerous to our freedoms.
If you love Obamacare, and want to see the rest of it fully implemented, go to the polls and elect Obama, or I promise you that Romney will gut it.
Of course, you may have your own favorite topic, whatever you care the most about, make your voice heard!
Even if you don’t live in what the media calls a “swing state” you simply MUST vote! I live in Wyoming, and we have a referendum on the ballot for an amendment to the state constitution that would limit the implementation of Obamacare in Wyoming. Every vote matters to state and local candidates and referendums, especially on the local issues which effect you more directly National Politics. I once voted for a state senator who won the election by only a handful of votes.
State and local governments can be more corrupt than the Federal government and you are the only check on their power! You simply must vote!
Generations yet unborn will read about this day in their history books, and you can be a part of that.
Repressed and enslaved people all over the world yearn for the power you have.
The blood of patriots and martyrs has fed the grass you walk on to put that ballot in your hand.
Please…I beg of you.
Oh, Felix, Felix. What are we going to do with you?
“A lot of guys they are talking about landing on Mars. Because [they say] it is so important to land on Mars because we would learn a lot more about our planet here, our Earth, by going to Mars which actually makes no sense to me because we know a lot about Earth and we still treat our planet, which is very fragile, in a really bad way.
“So I think we should perhaps spend all the money [which is] going to Mars to learn about Earth. I mean, you cannot send people there because it is just too far away. That little knowledge we get from Mars I don’t think it does make sense.
“That is tax money. People should decide ‘are you willing to spend all this money to go to Mars?’ I think the average person on the ground would never spend that amount of money – they have to spend it on something that makes sense and this is definitely saving our planet.” —- Felix Baumgartner
Well, some might say the same thing about that little publicity stunt that you pulled earlier this year. I won’t. I thought it was cool and I and others hail your explorer spirit.
Unfortunately, you fail to give the same credit to your fellow explorers.
Throughout history, short-sighted persons have contorted themselves to fit a foot in their mouth over the unforeseen benefits of exploration.
The government powers of his time called Columbus an “adventurer” and refused him a portion of their tax money for years until a forward-thinking Queen Isabella of Spain funded his expedition. What percentage of the world population spoke Spanish then compared to now? The results of that effort, for Spain and for you and I, are now a matter of history and Columbus and Isabella are seen as visionaries…him for recognizing that there was something important for him to find, and her for taking a chance which expanded the role of Spain as a superpower on the world stage.
Then there was Thomas Jefferson…who made the Louisiana purchase. Some believed that the land he bought was a “wasteland”. You and I know better. That act triggered early the financial successes that made this country a great nation.
I just finished watching the BBC documentary “Space Race“, where three super powers were so focused on developing ways to kill one and other with rockets that they all failed to see the benefits that could be had in having spacecraft that orbit the Earth. Looking back today we see what that handful of rocket scientists who pushed that effort forward meant when they claimed that such an ability would usher in a new age. The achievements of the space age that they started inspired other men…men like you…to do things with space that no one had ever tried. Still…even the dreams of those explorers fell far short of the immense technology revolution that their efforts have brought about.
From these short reminders of history we can learn the following…
1> That exploration always brings things into the world that weren’t there before.
2> That no one, not even the explorers themselves, can ever anticipate the multiple threads of change that those discoveries make in the lives and cultures of those that they touch.
3> That in spite of all of the legacy of wealth, power, and technology that branches out of exploration events, there is always a group of short-sighted meat heads who are willing to risk their reputations on the far-fetched prediction that the difficult and expensive exploration proposals of their generation will finally be the ones that turn out to be fruitless.
Open your eyes, man. You complain about the cost of the Curiosity Rover on Mars…2.5 billion dollars spread out over seven years. That’s chicken feed! Chump change! In 2011 our government paid that much in interest on the national debt every 1.7 days! You won’t impress anyone with your skills as an economist if you continue to demonstrate such a lack of ability to keep track of you decimal places. ;-)
As for your “save the planet” argument, I share it, but what do you propose we spend that 2.5 billion to save the planet from? No, no…don’t answer that. I have a partial list:
2> Illness (like AIDS, heart disease, lung cancer, and type II diabetes).
Oh ya, and of course there are also those climate change and ozone hole things that soooo few scientists are working on these days! Maybe the smart people who helped you with your space jump were neglecting their duty to humanity by working for you instead of studying environmental science like all the other good, responsible scientists of our time!
Have you stopped to consider that some things about our planet can only be learned by comparison with somewhere else?
Have you stopped to consider how many of the variables that govern climate change can be eliminated by looking closely at the climate of another planet that shares the same heat source as ours?
Have you stopped to consider that finding (or not finding) new life on Mars might teach us a little something about life on Earth?
Have you stopped to consider that maybe looking closely at a dead world and how it got that way might help folks better appreciate how rare and precious their own little blue gem is?
Or do you delude yourself into thinking that even though advancements and discoveries in one scientific pursuit always seems to branch out into other ones, that for some unnamed reason that process will somehow stop at Mars?
Just like your jump, Mars exploration brings tears to the eyes of the old and fires the imaginations of the young.
Just like your jump, Mars exploration pushes the envelope of what’s possible for all of humanity.
Just like your jump, Mars exploration will return in kind to whatever organization sponsors it.
Just like your jump, Mars exploration must solve new problems in order to succeed, and in doing so, adds to the wealth of human knowledge from which we all benefit in an ever-growing network of predictable and unpredictable ways.
And…just like your jump…the landing of the Curiosity rover on Mars, along with all of the other new achievements of 2012, will be seen as mere first steps in the years to come. Yet the explorers who achieved them will be listed among the other icons of history and science in the text books of tomorrow. Richard Branson‘s idea that your jump can be repeated from 400,000 feet will be possible because you gave people ideas that will advance technologies and make what you call “completely insane” a reality. Likewise, talk of the Moon, Mars, L2, and the outer planets wake up children who are now asleep and send them on science careers that may or may not lead them to space, but will lead them and our species forward.
The explorers of 2012 don’t know what they’ve started, but your grandchildren will!
I know little about the various versions of the Muslim religion. But the group of extremists that we out here in the West call the Taliban seem to have made a mistake of epic proportions. The shooting of Malala Yousafzai may have stripped from these militant traitors all that remains of what limited religious justification they ever may have had for their barbarism.
Malala, a blogger and vocal proponent of women’s rights since the age of 11, who has been threatened with her life before, was shot in the head and neck at age 15 by a Taliban gunman as she rode the bus to school. Thankfully, her brain was not injured in the attack. She had to flee to Great Britain for safety to recover from her injuries, and has since said that she will return to Swat to finish her education in spite of continued threats by some to keep targeting her until she is dead.
Religious leaders of every stripe, including Islam, have condemned the shooting. Unarmed women, children, and journalists, emboldened by Malala and the crime committed against her, have confronted Taliban in the streets to express their displeasure as if their country already had true Freedom of Speech. So why do the brutal Taliban continue? If they violate the rules of that same Islam that they claim to fight for, then were they ever truly fighting for Islam in the first place? I say they fight less for religion and more for the moldy and obsolete cultural advantages that men enjoy over there to keep women down and make them the equivalent of slaves in their own society. Like any irregular army, the Taliban rely on the good will of the people and a claim to the moral high-ground. They seem to have lost both with this savage attack on an unarmed, fifteen-year old girl.
Because of her past courage, the world already knew of Malala and her cause (click here for her blog), but now the bullets that were intended to quiet her have only exploded her fame and her message of hope, freedom, and peace far beyond anyone’s ability to stop it. Malala is now so much an icon of women’s struggles for freedom in the Middle East that even if they do kill her someday, it will only turn up the volume of her voice forever. Martyrs cannot be silenced.
I predict that history will record these events as a turning point against Muslim extremism. Her name will join the list of brave young heroins like Mary, Joan of Ark, and Sybil Ludington. Books, songs, poetry, movies, and plays will chronicle her life, and her example will serve as a template to upcoming generations of girls and women all over the world.
You go girl!
The 2012 Space Competitiveness Index, released October 3rd, reported that China has beaten the U.S. in total space launches this year. The report says that this is due in part to a five-year long loss of momentum on the part of the U.S.
What does this do? On every launch attempt, somebody learns how to do it a little bit better, and then pays their people to do it again. Each rocket built builds knowledge and infrastructure. Each successful launch excites and invigorates someone’s youth to learn about science and math.
That momentum in aerospace also expands into other scientific disciplines as well. But while we should all feel excitement for the growing global space awareness and space investment in general, U.S. citizens should ask themselves what all this can mean for their future.
1>Improvement of aerospace tech in nuclear-capable countries means the ability to manufacture better ICBMs that can reach the U.S.
2>Space launches are very expensive, that means that each launch provides many high-paying jobs and routine launches provide careers. Every time someone else launches a payload into orbit, someone else gets paid for something that the U.S. has known how to do for four or five decades.
3>Since launches are planned three to five years in advance, and new capabilities are drawn up decades in advance, any “uncertainty” by result in a lack of space activity by the upcoming generation. That means that our children could end up paying someone else a lot of money to do things for themselves that we did for ourselves because our parents and grand parents did for us with Gemini, Apollo, the Space Shuttle, and the ISS what we are too selfish to do for our children.
4>”Uncertainty” translates into a lack of direction caused by poor leadership by those in charge and misaligned priorities by the rest of us.
Yes…we have a rapidly growing commercial space industry that, once it matures, will bury every government-driven space program in the world.
Yes…we are still the only nation in the world to send people to the moon and back (for now).
Yes…we are still the undisputed leaders in planetary science, including Mars launch ability (for now).
However, we have just spent two years cutting into all three of those advantages. Our current leadership in those areas came from us going first, but the first one up the trail breaks the path. It won’t take China as long to go from orbital docking to lunar boots on the ground as it took us.
It won’t take Iran long to go from where they are to ICBMs either. Remember that the early U.S., Russian, and now Chinese space program goals started with military objectives. We launched our early science missions on military derived technical infrastructure and retired ICBM launchers…to some extent we still do. There is no reason to believe that it will be any different with Iran.
The one chance that we seem to have is Commercial Space, which is poised to steal the direction of space priorities away from Congress and give us the hope for the future that the Federal Government has refused to provide. However, those companies still require Federal Funding to keep moving forward at pacing and numbers that allows competition, can keep up with world growth, and sustain itself once it is turned loose.
NASA’s budget, as measured in fractions of a percent of the Federal budget, has shrunk to a point lower in 2012 than at any other time in history, during a period when the rest of the world is looking toward space. For a long time, our country’s citizens spent more on cosmetics than they did on space exploration (I don’t have current numbers on this, but I suspect it is still the case). At .48%, what has grown to a key technology growth direction worldwide amounts to a mere rounding error for the U.S. government spending priorities.
The responsibility for action is ours. In the U.S. (us), public opinion forms public policy. Get involved. Read up on what is happening. Form an opinion and talk about it with others…in places where our government can hear you.
If you live along the East Coast, watch for the glow of the SpaceX Falcon tonight as it rockets the Dragon capsule on a resupply mission to the International Space Station. You’ll have to catch it during its three minute, nine engine, first stage burn because you most likely won’t be able to see the single engine second stage burn. For ISS launches, rockets depart from the Florida coast and fly North East along the coast.
The technology development for these commercial resupply missions was made possible under the COTS (Commercial Orbital Transportation System) program, started under then-President G.W. Bush in conjuction with his cancellation of the Space Shuttle program after the Columbia accident. CCDev (Commercial Crew Development), emphasized by President Obama to develop commercial manned launches to the ISS instead of using NASA rockets, is currently underway. The SpaceX Dragon capsule is part of both programs and has been designed from the ground up for manned flight, though this launch carries only cargo.
We should all support any effort that gets our respective countries closer to the routine human launch capability that is at the core of our species’ future in space.
The rocket is scheduled to launch at 8:35 pm EDT.
Easier for whom?
Easier to raise imported gas prices after the election and blame the oil producers for it?
Easier to cause inflation?
Easier for banks to make money?
Easier to make the rapidly expanding national debt appear to be not so high by lowering the value of the money the government owes?
Easier to artificially inflate stock values so that the economy looks more like it’s recovering just before the election?
Easier for professional stock brokers to make money playing the resulting bubble?
Easier for sitting Presidents to get reelected in a rosy-looking economy?
Easier for a certain Fed director to protect his job after Romney has said he’d fire him?
Hmmm…Somehow it just doesn’t look any easier to me.
Inflation hurts every American, not just the rich.
Higher gas prices hurts every American, not just the rich.
A phony stock market value bubble is not growth, it is an investment trap that makes the stock market more volatile.
Cooking the numbers on the economy just before an election in order to keep your own job is dishonest.
Short-term, phony fixes that do more damage down the road are irresponsible.
Spending our tax money to buy up debt now so that we can pay more at the pump and grocery counter later will not help economic growth, it’ll suffocate it.
Saturday’s Christian Fandom Meeting went well, they are a very nice group of folk. We discussed diversity, and the silliness of the science vs religion debate (two of my favorite topics), among other things.
I stumbled upon a Luke Ski filk concert and had a good laugh. Filk is speculative fiction fandom folk music. The name came from a miss spelling that stuck. I signed a copy of Into the Dark: Escape of the Nomad for a nice lady who likes to steal authors at The Book Scouts. I signed another for a boy who sat with me at breakfast. I signed another for the well-traveled scientist Jonathon Vos Post.
At the late-night parties on Saturday I made a few new freinds and found a friend from Conduit who heard my reading of Where’s the Cat at LTUE and wants to publish it in an anthology of Christian SciFi that he’s putting together.
On Sunday I went to church and then packed to leave.
Sunday was also the Hugo awards ceremony and I streamed it from my hotel room. Technical note: When using your cell phone’s 4G to stream over WiFi to your laptop, start with the cell phone fully charged and plug it into the wall, not the computer. Also, anytime your Droid 4 or Razor battery dies a deep discharge death so that the phone just sits there with a solid blue LED lit instead of charging, hold down the power and the down volume buttons for 20 seconds (to hard reset the phone) and then plug it into the wall..not the computer…to recharge it.
A funny thing happened at the Hugo awards that will feed the history books of fandom for decades, and the folks attending the Hugos maybe didn’t even notice it unless they had their Tweeters on. When announcing the nominees for Best Dramatic Presentation it is standard practice to play clipped excerpts from the videos in question. Well, several new Dr. Who episodes were nominated and they played short clips of them last night before announcing the winner. Now, before I go on, Hugo nominees release copies of any work that is up for an award as part of the voting process.
Anyway, something went wrong with that whole “play the approved clip…it’s ok” process because UStream banned the Hugo Awards Ceremony for Copyright infringement and cut-off the feed shortly after the Dr. Who clips were played. Any folks (like me) who were watching from afar had to use their Tweeters to follow the rest of the awards.
Today at 10:30 am is my book signing, so I’ll be at the signing tables until noon and then I’ll be out the door and off to the post office to mail home any unsold books and then off to the airport. If you want an autographed copy of the book that I’ve been waving in front of everybody’s faces all weekend, then buy one in the Dealer’s Room at Book Universe, Larry Smith’s, or the The Book Scouts and then bring it to the signing table. I’d love to meet you.
The first person who shows me their smartphone at the signing table and calls it a “Tweeter” will get a signed copy of Escape of the Nomad for free.
Unless some new adventure happens today, this will be my final post on my Chicon 7 trip. All in all my second Worldcon has gone well. I will definitely plan early for Lonestarcon in San Antonio next year and get into the con hotel. Using a less costly and more distant hotel turned out to be not that much less expensive because of the rental car and parking fees and was a huge hassle to boot. It was that way in Reno last year too, but not so bad that I learned my lesson. Now it is firmly etched in my brain so that I shall part the funding waves in January and get’er done without fail next time.
The Surviving Chicon panel was fun, but I had to leave it early to meet with a publisher. Most of what they covered were things that I already knew about except for the the charity auctions. There are also fund raisers to send representatives of fandom from one country to another.
They did mention another little item that I have heard of before and wrote about last year. Upon strolling through Con Suite…during one of its more crowded moments…I smelt a need to reiterate this item here again. It is called the 6-2-1 rule of minimum personal maintenance in day to day Worldcon attendence.
Sleep 6 hours.
If you are here with us, PLEASE shower once…at least…per day.
Please please please please please please!
I also participated in a great one and a half hour panel yesterday of New Writers. Those in the audience were also writers. One of our Hugo nominees chaired the discussion where we discussed our work, career paths, successes and failures. Once again I had an opportunity to talk to some folks about my book and about theirs.
Today I have the Christian Fandom meeting. If I have time, I might read my short story “Where’s the Cat?” (Click here to read it yourself free online), but I probably won’t since there are literally tons of very important other things to cover. Either way, if you ask me a question about “Where’s the Cat?” in the meeting I’ll give you a signed copy of Into the Dark: Escape of the Nomad.
See you at the Con!
Two words…Chicago Traffic.
In spite of much research ahead of time I grossly underestimated the time necessary to get from the plane to the con. First, the airport lost my luggage and I spent about an hour in baggage claim. Then the time it takes to get to the rental car company and get a car delayed me some more. Then the freeway was a parking lot.
Summary, no reading.
Kudos go to the organization of the con staff and the great layout of the Hyatt Regency though. I was able to go straight to where I needed to be for the Indie panel. We had an engaging discussion, everyone learned something, and I met some great folk on both sides of the table.
The Adler Planetarium was interesting. I have been to several and this one compares well with the others.
The planetarium has an arrangement with Chicon. It started with the event “First night at the Adler Plantarium” and ran buses back and firth for the first night. Chicon attendees will have free access to the planetarium for the rest of the conference.
“The Searcher” was the movie that they played at one of the domed theaters. The last time I sat in such a venue I fell asleep, but this time things moved along and stayed interesting enough to compete with the sandman, the darkness of the room and the comfort of the chairs. I got in at the last showing and then finally got back to the car and then the hotel after midnight.
What’s going on Friday? I don’t have a panel until this afternoon, but I really need to attend the “Surviving Chicon” panel before then. Yesterday I spent too much money for parking. I’ll pass along some of what I learn there in tomorrow’s piece.
Now what we need is a panel on how to save money at the con next year in Texas.
Update: I almost forgot! If you’re at the con, be sure and come see me and authors Nancy Fulda, M Todd Gallowglas, Sarah Hans, and Jason Heller for the New Writer’s Session #2 at 4:30 in the Aadams room, Silver Level.
(Hint: The first person in the room that says, “I’m a Telesian” will receive a free autographed copy of Into the Dark:Escape of the Nomad so they can read it and learn what a Telesian is.)
Today the less expensive parking (West Tower) closes at 8 so I think I’ll find somewhere away from here to eat dinner and turn in at a reasonable hour.
On a separate note, the new OS for my Droid 4, Icecream Sandwich, can edit photos, allowing me to crop this amazing photo I took of the Chicago shore from the Planetarium bridge way.
Aside from circumstances which caused an hour of delays (planned into my schedule of course), the process of getting on the plane went smoothly. I did forget to bring my box of reader’s guides for Into the Dark:Escape of the Nomad, but the guide can be found here on this blog and I’ll arrange to have some printed locally for the signing on Monday.
From the looks of the hurricane track out just this morning, Issac might make Chicago a bit wet and perhaps even delay my return flight, but my Droid here tells me that the forecast calls for mild weather. We’ll see how this notoriously unpredictable storm plays out over the coming days. I wouldn’t mind hanging out in Chicago a little longer to spend some alone time working on my next book, Into the Dark:Pirate’s Blood.
Pirate’s Blood continues the fight for Earth while following our heros through new adventures in a newly interstellar travel aware system which has evolved a serious, system wide piracy problem. The Crenum and the Zom are also there in the mix, along with a compellingly attractive new hero. ;-)
(Hint: For those who attend the reading, the first person who asks me a question that tells me that they read the above revelations from Pirate’s Blood, will receive a free autographed copy of Escape of the Nomad)
In Escape of the Nomad, another storm, hurricane Vince, swings north up the Atlantic and provides cover for U.S. war planes to escape from Zom fighters. I don’t think I’ll be reading that part at my reading at 5:00 in the DuSable room however. Instead, I’ll read a somewhat humorous piece about the Zom agent, Clell, that also provides a nice summary on earlier events in the book. I’ll follow that up with a military engagement between our heros and a Zom transport, fighter pod, and shuttle full of Zom Marines that try to interdict and board them as they leave Saturn. If there is time, I’ll read about the U.S. military’s first engagement with the Zom invasion fleet.
Of course, if you’re one of my regular readers on this blog, then you probably already know how all of that turns out. Even so, I invite you to stop by anyway and let me meet you in person. For those who haven’t read it yet, it will be available from Book Universe and several other booths in the Dealer Room throughout the con.
Later at 6 pm I’ll be on a panel with several other authors in the Columbus CD for “To Indie or not to Indie” a discussion of the pros and cons of self publishing. The moderator of this discussion will be none other than Mike Shepard Moscoe, author of the Kris Longknife series. The other panelist are:
(Hint: I’ll give an autographed copy of Escape of the Nomad to the first person attending this panel who says to me, “I’m a Telesian”. Common, be brave, being a Telesian is a good thing…trust me. :) Or if you don’t trust me, you could first click the cover art in the sidebar of this blog to read Chapter 1 and learn what a Telesian is.)
Wow! Long flights breed long blog entries. I’ll upload it when the plane lands for my connection in Minneapolis. If this post looks weird, it’s because I wrote it using the WordPress app for Android and I won’t know what it really looks like on the page until I get a chance to view it in a browser later. That might not happen until I get to the Adler Planetarium. I’ll add more links to it then as well.
See you at Chicon!
Neil Armstrong is a bold name, made large by the man who bore it. Whatever chance of circumstance put his boot print and famous quote first on the moon, it was not what made him a hero. He showed us all how a man can bear fame with dignity.
Yes, I will work hard in pursuit of my dreams as his family suggests, and I’ll wink at the moon at my next opportunity. I’m sure his spirit returned there to visit soon after it freed itself from the flesh.
It is my hope that this country and world are building more of him to follow in his footsteps, both on Earth and beyond.
Or is that three words?
No matter, Verizon auto-updated my phone today with the latest and coolest Android OS including a sweet new look and feel to the user interface, some new features, and is it just me or did it get faster?
I now need to get used to the new features and some other things, like I think all my previously downloaded email is no longer on the phone. If so then I’ll need figure out how to get Droid to refetch it.
If this hasn’t yet happened to you and your new Android phone from Verizon, hang in there, it’s on the way.
Curiosity’s first test object, a rock now called “Coronation“, received several blasts of laser fire from the rover today to test its composition.
The laser excites a portion of the rock’s surface to a plasma so that a spectrometer can isolate the atoms that the rock is made of.
Also, the rock has a Twitter presence ( @N165Mars ) where you can read about more events that happen to it. Somebody mentioned in a Tweet that the rock should be glad that they didn’t drill it…
Scientists say that life on Earth began spontaneously–but “spontaneous” is a loaded word. What precisely caused it? What range of conditions need to prevail in order to get life going.
The critters on this planet, including us, seem very well suited to its particular patterns of night and day, heat and cold, and light and dark. Our moon also, with its particular mass and distance, helps generate the dynamo inside the Earth that produces the magnetosphere that protects us from cosmic rays. Does the spark to start a planet like this one, vibrant with self-sufficient life, require such a rare, seemingly random cosmic combination, or are the physical requirements broader?
That is the question that Mars can answer. There are places here on Earth that support microbiological life in hostile conditions similar to those on Mars, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that similar conditions can START life. The Mars Science Laboratory is the latest, most capable attempt to ask Mars that question. It might be the last chance to get a good answer too, because very soon there could be so much human built hardware heading for Mars that any life found could be suspect as to its origins.
One question Curiosity has already answered defines the survivability of the journey. It measured the cosmic radiation on the way to Mars, and continues to measure it on Mars. Those results seem to show that humans can get there and back with currently available space flight technology quickly enough that the radiation wouldn’t kill them. This will eliminate one of the major persuasive barriers to a human mission to Mars and open up new discussion on the capabilities and timeline for such a project.
Curiosity is great, but with its landing last week, and the science that it has already done, I think it has put Mars at the limit of what a probe can do. More appropriately, it has put Mars within the human envelope, making the inconvenience and slow working up period of any more rover missions burdensome. If some people can call a manned mission to the Moon “been there done that” then I think that the same can now be said for robotic missions to Mars. I heard that Curiosity carries at best a 2 megapixel camera, not because NASA scrimped on the imagery budget but because 2 megapixels was pretty good back in 2004 when the MSL project was put together and proposed and the tech for it was etched in stone. Aboard the ISS, astronauts just bring their cell phone cameras with them when they go. Not only that but Mars is more than 7 light minutes away. These are isolated examples of the trouble with robotic probes…the work moves very slowly. We go to a lot of extra trouble and uncertainty to prepare dumb machines to function autonomously, with slow, inflexible and limited tools and computers that become outdated long before we send them far from the real brains involved in the effort. Humans have never built a machine that can replace them by more than a fraction of a percent but we still need to learn how to go it ourselves safely. I think the best way to learn is like my daddy always said, “Roll up your sleeves, put on your hip-boots, and jump in!”
Another thing…just because Earth possessed the “spark of life” once before doesn’t mean it will always have it. It is true that Mars remains a poor substitute for Earth, no matter how bad Earth can get, but the things that some of us can learn while living on Mars might come in handy for humanity some day if conditions on Earth deteriorate. A single species-killing meteor or type 8 caldera eruption could plunge this planet into a ten year long ice age. As a species we might survive such a disaster, but would so many die that our culture becomes lost? Or are we even worthy to survive if all we have learned to do is sit contentedly on the ground and watch the sun pass overhead while we send robots to do the jobs of men?
We all saw how excited everyone was to see a robot land on Mars…imagine how much bigger the cool factor will be when we send a team of humans. That is because real people possess the spark of life and robots don’t. That spark has a purpose…it gives us breath, but then it sets us moving in interesting directions. The target we call Mars abounds with phenomenal accomplishments, but it is also littered with the bones of failure. Now that we have proven repeatedly that we can succeed on Mars, will our final failure be a lack of initiative to follow up on those successes? Will we save our spark of life because we set out and took chances and learned how that spark works, or might we just vanish into the oblivion of the mega-fauna of this planet that weren’t equipped to adapt?
Or is that what the spark of life is all about after all…the willingness and ability to grow?
The Mars Science Laboratory, the largest object ever sent to Mars, has landed successfully on the planet. Weighing in at a ton, and roughly the size of my wife’s car, it had to drop 13,000 mph of speed, through the thin atmosphere of Mars, in just 7 minutes. With the high approach velocity, the size of the rover, and the complexity of the innovative Sky Crane landing system, this has probably been history’s most daring un-manned landing on an alien planet. Putting Mars dirt on the wheels without cratering it will put all the nay-sayers to silence.
Here is a screen shot from NASA coverage of the landing, showing the surface of Mars as seen from Curiosity, along with one of the rover’s wheels, and celebrating mission control technicians…
This has been another historic first for NASA. Congratulations NASA and JPL and all you smart folks that made this great achievement for human kind possible.
Over the Labor Day weekend I am honored to be serving on a couple of panels at the World Science Fiction Convention 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. It’ll be my first time back to the windy city in almost twenty years and my second trip to WorldCon, so I’m pretty happy. Life being the way it is, I wasn’t sure even a week ago if I’d be able to attend WorldCon this year. I’m glad that things came together in my life and career to make it possible.
Here is my unconfirmed schedule…
Thursday, Aug. 23rd, 5:00-5:00 pm—Reading—Into the Dark: Escape of the Nomad (and maybe a short story or new book preview…or two).
Thursday, Aug.23th—6:00-7:30 pm—To Indie or Not to Indie—Mike Shepherd Moscoe (I have one of his books) will moderate a discussion with myself, Hugh Howey, J. Kathleen Cheney, and Michael Coorlim on the pros and cons of self publishing.
Thursday, Aug.23th—7:30-10:30 pm—Hanging out at the Adler Planetarium Event.
Saturday, Aug. 25th—All day—Catch me if you can! I’ll be attending panels and events at the con, meeting with folks, and making a general nuisance of myself.
Update: Saturday, Aug. 25th—Noon—Christian Fandom Meeting.
Monday, Sept. 3rd—10:30 am-12:00 pm—Autograph Session 17—Signing with me will be: Alan Smale, K.A. Bedford, Kameron Hurley, Mary Frances Zambreno, Michael R. Underwood, Robert G Pielke, and Warren Hammond.
To the best of my recollection, I’ve never met any of these fine artists and I look forward to shaking their hands and sitting at the table with them. A complete and detailed program does not seem to be available yet at the time I write this, but here is a link to the general schedule. Change is inevitable, so it is with early con programs…they’ll need to make a few adjustments here and there and some of those adjustments might touch me. Room assignments seem to change more than other things so I haven’t included them here.
If you belong to any of the names in the above “Name-drop List of Unusual Size”, then please click the link and make sure that you are what the page behind the link says you are. With our society being what it is with its oft-used names, even really unique ones like Housley show up in Google searches with links to more than one actual person. Comment below if I got it wrong and I’ll fix it.
If anyone reading this has plans to attend Chicon I’d love to meet you. You can pin a message on the board for me or just chase me down at one of the panels. You can also click on my picture on the sidebar of this blog to send me a message that will go to my Droid 4 phone.
If you’re reading this blog then you are a science fiction (or science) fan and if you live in the Chicago area there stands before you a rare opportunity. If you didn’t plan to attend at least some part of Chicon, then I energetically recommend that you reconsider. They’ve planned lots of informative panels and fun activities…plus you get to see, hear, and rub elbows with people much more famous than me. This is the leading Science Fiction gathering place in the world, organized and ran by YOU the fans of the art. We’ll all miss you if you aren’t there. ;-) Ordinary folks from all over the country spend their tax returns and accumulated time off from work every year to travel to wherever WorldCon is being held, don their Spock ears or Wookie costumes, and celebrate Science Fiction…the entertainment genre that made a sub-culture…as well as speculative fiction in general (note the grumpy author in the pic below).
JPL’s NASA’s Solar System Simulator has added the Mars Science Laboratory to its list of trackable spacecraft. Using this tool you can see Mars and Earth from the rover’s perspective as it speeds toward its date with the red planet on Sunday.
To go there, click here:
Of course, it’s only a simulation. When it lands for real it’ll take 7 minutes and we woun’t know if it landed or crashed for 14 minutes. That’s how long it takes light…and radio transmissions…to get here from Mars.
The show begins on Sunday at 8:30 pm PDT.
“A what?” I asked, trying hard not to sound encouraging.
“No, Harold, I don’t know. What is a ‘rodeo’?”
He tipped back in his chair and slapped his knee, which was Harold’s little way of saying, “Bernie, you sure are stupid!”
He then regaled me with some romantic description of crazy people catching, riding, and otherwise tormenting some half-wild mammals called ‘cows’ and ‘horses’.
“Rodeos were a form of entertainment back on Earth,” he said. “They were a big hit. Lasted for centuries. We’ll be rolling in it.”
“I don’t know Harold this is Chara 4—not Earth. We’ve tried playing with Earth trends before,” I wanted to let him down easy. “Remember what happened last year with that…hula poop thing?”
“Hula hoop…HOOP! You’re always saying poop instead of hoop. You never seem to get it right!”
“Ya ya, ok, fine—hoop, poop, whatever. We fabricated hundreds of the things, and we only sold ten.”
“But that was different. The hula hoop was just a fad on Earth…rodeo was a culture. I’ve been doing some reading…”
Ah-oh, he’s been reading again.
Here we go! Where does he find these things?
He pulled out his data pad and showed me some history article.
I humored him and read it, looking carefully for anything—any excuse to say, “we can’t do this because…”
“But, Harold,” I said, “it says here that rodeo wasn’t a culture at all, but a reenactment contest for people in the meat growing industry.”
“Ya, so? We grow meat.”
I sighed. “Look at this,” I said, pointing to a picture of one of the creatures in the article. “That animal…is huge! It stands…what…something like two, three meters high at the shoulder? Heaven only knows how much it weighs. And besides, we don’t even have any of these animals on Chara 4. Are we going to ship these beasts across twenty-seven light years? It’ll cost a fortune. Do they even still exist on Earth?”
He raised his brows. I never fully understood how logic could escape him so completely.
“What about strelich? We have lots of those!”
“What?” I exclaimed. “You want to start a game where people ride our strelich like folks used to ride…this thing.” I pointed at the creature in the article. The thought of a man sitting astride a half-meter high lizard nearly caused me to burst out laughing, but I bit it back.
“No, of course not, that’d be silly. They wouldn’t ride the strelich—they’d ride Krazzken.”
“Krazzken,” I repeated.
“Krazzken,” he said with a smile.
That was a year ago, and what an adventure it has been. Designing various mounting apparatus to fit a eight meter long, ten legged insect turned out to be the easy part. Teaching—or rather persuading—the Krazzken to chase after strelich was another matter entirely. So finally Harold hired someone to translate that history article into the Krazzkens’ language so they could read about it for themselves. They got right into it, and even had fun with it! It ended up revolutionizing Human-Krazzken relations.
The only problem was then we had to cut them in on the profits.
You just can’t fool a Krazzken.
America the Beautiful
Written by: Katherine Lee Bates
O beautiful for spacious skies,
For amber waves of grain,
For purple mountain majesties
Above the fruited plain!
God shed His grace on thee,
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea!
O beautiful for pilgrim feet
Whose stern impassion’d stress
A thorough fare for freedom beat
Across the wilderness.
God mend thine ev’ry flaw,
Confirm thy soul in self-control,
Thy liberty in law.
O beautiful for heroes prov’d
In liberating strife,
Who more than self their country loved,
And mercy more than life.
May God thy gold refine
Till all success be nobleness,
And ev’ry gain divine.
O beautiful for patriot dream
That sees beyond the years
Thine alabster cities gleam
Undimmed by human tears.
God shed his grace on thee,
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea.
That’s right! The future is now!
In the movie Back to the Future II, the characters of the three part movie series travel forward in time to a futuristic culture where cars fly, folks do bank transactions on the street with a scanned thumbprint, and teenagers wear their pants inside out!
I just found out that that day is June 27th, 2012!
So here it is…the Back to the Future II theme music from the sound track.